The House has now passed a school voucher plan for the District. A similar plan was approved by the Senate Appropriations Committee but still must be brought to a full vote. Notable Democractic Senators Dianne Feinstein and Robert Byrd crossed party lines to vote for the proposal. Louisana Senator Mary Landrieu abstained but still faced the wrath of the Black Alliance for Educational Options who took out a full page ad in a New Orleans newspaper pointedly noting that she sends her kids to a Georgetown private school and accusing her of turning her back on African Americans. Other DC voucher groups have taken on Ted Kennedy for his opposition to vouchers likening him to Bull Connor. Strong material coming from anyone, let alone a traditional Democrat base.
I can't let this opportunity pass to reply to some of Tyler's further comments but I'll put those in the extension.
The debate so far Tyler 1, Alex 1, Tyler 2.
Let me take Tyler’s weakest point first. He writes, “Imagine politicians upping the voucher amount and coverage to win votes each election cycle…” What like education spending is not a political issue today? In fact, over the past several decades we have doubled real per-capita spending on schooling with zero increase in productivity. It’s possible that government would set an education voucher at too high an amount (but let’s get it above zero before we worry about this!) but at least we will get something for our money.
Defining an acceptable school is a legitimate issue but one that we already face today with private schools, charter schools, and home schooling. I see no reason why private schools under a voucher system could not be regulated as private schools are today. Private schools do face some minimal regulations including hours and some content requirements but I don’t think these have been a significant constraint. Some private schools will undoubtedly teach nonsense but Tyler seems to forget that Ebonics, to give just one example, was a creature of the public schools not the private schools.
I will agree, however, that current voucher plans are typically terrible. Existing vouchers are often limited to poor students and sometimes just to poor students in “failing” schools, the voucher amounts are typically low and to add insult to injury it is often illegal to add-on to the voucher amount (a type of price control). Finally, nowhere near enough students are suported. The DC plan, for example, is aimed at some 2,000 students in a school system of 66,000.
I recommend John Merrifield’s School Choices: True and False as an antidote to this kind of limited thinking. Merrifield’s bottom line is that we need a system under which the government in no way discriminate against parents who send their children to private schools.
Comments on this entry are closed.