Most of it concerns the economics of sports. Here is Skip’s blog. Here is Matt Yglesias on why the Mavericks are better without Steve Nash.
by Tyler Cowen on June 10, 2006 at 8:16 am in Sports | Permalink
Most of it concerns the economics of sports. Here is Skip’s blog. Here is Matt Yglesias on why the Mavericks are better without Steve Nash.
Previous post: The Work Vacation
Next post: Net neutrality, part II













Get smart with the Thesis WordPress Theme from DIYthemes.
Yglesias’ analysis, while interesting, is inconclusive at best. Dirk is famous for working hard on different facets of his game in the offseason (oftentimes with a former coach in Germany), so it is tough to say that he wouldn’t have developed a post-up game had Nash stayed.
Further, coach Johnson played on a team with two excellent post players (David Robinson and Tim Duncan), a team that had a philosophy of slowing the game down and using post play. It is difficult to say he wouldn’t have used this method even if Nash had remained a Maverick. I think the Mavericks would much rather have Steve Nash then Erick Dampier right now.
Hello all really cool blog
alprazolam online fioricet online hydrocodone online vicodin online tramadol online xanax online valium online ultram online soma online carisoprodol online ambien online ativan online lorazepam online propecia online adipex online didrex online cialis online levitra online paxil online meridia online viagra online wellbutrin online clonazepam online xenical online prozac online butalbital online phentermine online
ativan online adipex online didrex online levitra online cialis online phentermine online soma online tramadol online diazepam online carisoprodol online meridia online paxil online valium online xanax online ultram online fioricet online tooth whitening online cheap online pharmacy cheap alprazolam online cheap car insurance cheap payday loan new web directory new business directory buy carisoprodol cheap hydrocodone online vicodin online
Comments on this entry are closed.