Kathleen Day’s article in the Washington Post on Wal-Mart’s plan to offer a $4 price for many generic pharmaceuticals is a classic example, practically a caricature, of anti-market, anti-big-business bias. Here with emphases added are some choice quotes from the front page article:
Retailing giant Wal-Mart Stores Inc., known for forcing prices down to
dominate nearly every market it enters, said yesterday that it would
sell nearly 300 generic drugs for $4 per prescription…Using its might as the nation’s largest retailer and its legendary
ability to force suppliers to cut prices to the bone, the company will
begin the $4 price program in its 65 stores in the Tampa area today……the program has the potential to transform the $230 billion
prescription-drug business the way Wal-Mart has transformed other
industries, including groceries and toys, where its aggressive pricing
has forced some competitors out of business and allowed it to dominate
entire categories of merchandise.
In the entire article there is not a single positive mention from the reporter of consumer benefits or Wal-Mart productivity. It’s not until inside the fold that you even get a hint of consumer benefits and then it’s in the context of an absurdly biased attack on Wal-Mart.
Wal-Mart executives, criticized by labor unions and consumer groups
that say the company shortchanges its employees on pay and health care,
said they started the program to help families and retirees, especially
those on Medicare.
The only thing missing is how Wal-Mart executives achieve their legendary efficiencies by eating small children for breakfast.
For comparison the AP story, written by Mitch Stacy, covers the same angles but without bias or rancor and it’s better written. Here’s the first sentence:
Wal-Mart,
the world’s largest retailer, plans to slash the prices of almost 300
generic prescription drugs, offering a big lure for bargain-seeking
customers and presenting a challenge to competing pharmacy chains and
makers of generic drugs.
This is news that should really be celebrated, not criticized, by the press. We’re not infequently bombarded by news about the high cost of health care, both in absolute terms and in regard to our health spending relative to that of other countries. This will decrease inflationary pressures in this industry. It should also create a virtuous economic cycle by having a slight decreasing effect on overall inflation (lower interest rates, lower COLA adjustments for Social Security, etc.), and slight improvement in the current account deficit(Fewer people buying their medicine from Canada). We should be dancing in the streets. In fact, I’m taking the rest of the day off!
Nice post. Ms. Day is a disgrace.
I explained to my EC101 class that the benefit from reduced prices by Walmart dwarfs any benefits from the government: earned income tax credit, food stamps. You name it.
I wonder why that slipped this journalists mind.
Thanks
Matt
The AP article isn’t exactly true neutral either, I can see someone picking it apart for being relentlessly competition-assuming and price-focused (as in, “this costs less, so it must be better, no matter how it was achieved”).
I recall listening to a series of stories several years ago somewhat like this. The AMA was concerned that too many people were going into medicine and there was going to be a glut of doctors. I recall NPR giving this very favorable coverage.
I keep wanting to see more people do the trick of changing the situation around to people you’re more/less sympathetic to, and seeing if the story still rings true. Like
“The federal government today declared that it would use its enormous bargaining power to get $4 generic drugs for all US citizens.”
or
“GM, Ford, and Daimer-Chrysler are very concerned that there may soon be a glut of cars on the market. ‘Something must be done to limit the number of new cars on the market,’ said Ford CEO Fred Moneybags….”
I think this isn’t done because fair or honest aren’t nearly as important as interesting and readable for journalists.
is wal-mart offering the $4 figure to customers or just to their employees? I believe that it is part of their health insurance–solely for employees.
STR- The price reductions mentioned are very large but they are not a quantum leap. The three medications mentioned in the article can already be gotten online for $8, $13 and $13 respectively. Generic drugs in the US are already the lowest prices in the world and the reductions WalMart is offering are probably the result of volume,logistics knowledge, and smaller margins.
if generics are cheaper, there’s less money in counterfeiting them, right? so why would this increase fraud? it’s the other way round — there’s incentive to counterfeit very expensive prescription drugs. or am i misunderstanding what you’re saying?
DJ: I suppose you’re right, straight up.
Here’s what I’m saying: WalMart lowers its prices quite a bit by selling low-cost goods made by foreign labor. The temptation to begin shipping in Chinese-made generics, for example, will be high. I know, for example, they’re winning the vitamin market on price.
I don’t know about the US, but I’m pretty sure that there’s not a large counterfeiting problem in terms of pharmaceuticals. [Smiling Bob notwithstanding.] I believe in China, counterfeiting drugs is a real problem. What’s to stop them from sending them to the US in their WalMart shipments?
I don’t think there’s anything that should be done to stop foreign generics; I’m just saying that the temptation to tablet flour and sell it as penicillin would be there and higher than it is now.
So … It’s unfair to say that Wal-Mart plays hardball?
There are a few things interesting about the Wal-Mart $4 generic announcement.
A look at the list of generics finds that netting out the different dosages (such as 12 dosages of amoxicillin), there are really only about 120 distinct drugs. And for the most part, those drugs are either low-volume, old, or OTC (for instance, generic forms of OTC drugs like advil and pepcid–not sure why you’d get a prescription for those). It appears the company effectively cherry-picked the cheapest or least used prescription generics to use for the program. While they might account for a fifth of generic scripts filled, they by no means account for a fifth of generic profits. So can they eventually extend this to all other generics? Probably not, the lack of profits would be way too inhibitive, particularly with potential profits from a massive wave of generics coming through the end of 2011. Management’s assertion that this is not a loss leader may be true, but I’m willing to bet they will be pretty close to a loss. They already source most generics directly from manufacturers in countries like India, not through their distributor McKesson, so there’s no change there. They will be able to maintain profits through better “logistics” and “technology” (words of management).
It seems to me they just want the good PR around election time.
It isn’t biased to say that Wal-Mart plays hardball with suppliers and forces them to cut their prices to the bone. It’s well-documented. And, depending on your point of view, that’s either a good or bad thing.
This is another case of the biased accusing others of having bias. There’s nothing perjorative about the word “forcing.” That’s what Wal-Mart does; it’s known for being a touch negotiator, and nobody would deny it has the upper hand in dealing with suppliers.
There ought to be a moratorium on cries of bias in the media. It’s tiresome, and it’s almost always in the eyes of the beholder.
“Why can’t we have a better press corps?”
Isn’t it because indignation sells?
“There’s nothing perjorative about the word “forcing.” That’s what Wal-Mart does…”
It is most certainly not. Wal-mart offers terms and its supplies are free to accept or decline. There is violence or threat thereof involved.
Forcing people to do things is the business of government.
Nobody seems to have noticed that the $4 price for these generics is actually less than the copayments demanded (“forced on members?”) by the big health insurers. So those without health insurance can now get drugs cheaper than those with health insurance, unless I’m missing something. I wonder how much of the massive health insurance premiums that are bankrupting employers are devoted to generic drugs? Or have health insurers – God forbid! – been overcharging for generics all along?
I really don’t understand why people insist on bashing Wal-Mart all the time. I guess because of its size Wal-Mart is an attractive target. But let’s not forget that it is a great American success story. Sam Walton began his business just as every other small business does through hard work and a vision. He expanded it through innovations in technology and organization.
Sure Wal-Mart does not pay its employees a lot, and has terrible benefits but what other business offers semi-skilled employees above average wages and great benefits? Most of the people that work at Wal-Mart are part time, unskilled laborers. (How many times have you had the cashier who just can’t figure out how the machine works?) If Wal-Mart were not in their area, they might not be employed at all. When Wal-Mart moves into an area it brings in hundreds of jobs that might not otherwise be there. Not all of the jobs are through the retail giant. Wal-Mart rarely opens a stand-alone store; most often it is an anchor to a shopping area, complete with restaurants and other supporting businesses. Many times these businesses are chains, but just as often they are locally owned and are guaranteed to have a steady supply of customers due to the traffic created by Wal-Mart. Lets not forget the hundreds of local skilled laborers and craftsmen that it took to build the shopping complex.
Another point that anti-Wal-Marters like to rail about is the amount of foreign produced goods they import and offer. Most of the items that Wal-Mart offers are cheap items that most people don’t even think about until they need it, and when you do, you don’t want to spend any more than you have to. Americans are not willing to work for the low wages that it takes to produce low price goods, but they enjoy the benefits of being able to purchase those low priced goods. Higher production costs mean higher cost of the product. Let’s face it: if you could buy Chinese produced paper plates for $.97 or US produced plates of the same quality for $2.50 which are you going to buy?
Most of the people that I hear talk down about Wal-Mart would have a heart attack if they were suddenly forced to pay a lot more on their grocery bill because cheaply produced foreign goods were no longer driving down the prices of goods produced here in the US.
Don’t get me wrong, I’m not saying Wal-Mart does not have any bad business practices but I am saying that the benefit that it serves to the vast majority of the American public overwhelmingly outweighs the evils. It has been my experience that people who decry the evils of Wal-Mart are doing so without thinking the whole issue through. I think they would be the same people who would scream the loudest if forced to suddenly live in a Wal-Mart-less world.
xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2 xoomer.xxxvideos2
MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE MEGSPASE
idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG idisk.VIDEOSBLOG
$uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies $uperEVAvideos-movies
tiffany rings
tiffany earrings
tiffany necklaces
tiffany pendants
Tiffany Engagement Rings
thank you. Beatifull Archile !
sohbet – chat – sohpet – çet – muhabbet – sesli sohbet – sohbet – sohbet chat – sohbet kanallari – sohbet – sohbet – sohbet odalari – mirc – mirc indir – turkce mirc – yonja sohbet – sohbet – chat kanallari – bedava chat – sohpet – burc – burclar – gunluk burclar – dizi izle – sohbet sitesi sohbet odaları sohbet kanalları sohbet – sohbet sitesi seviyeli sohbet – Dizi izle – Müzik Dinle – mp3 Dinle – turk chat – seditio eklenti
Comments on this entry are closed.