Nobel Prize

by on October 4, 2006 at 7:41 am in Current Affairs, Science | Permalink

The Nobel Prize in genetics chemistry was won today by Roger Kornberg for his work on DNA transcription.  His father, Arthur Kornberg, also won a Nobel prize for his work in genetics.

happyjuggler0 October 4, 2006 at 1:06 pm

His father, Arthur Kornberg, also won a Nobel prize for his work in genetics.

I guess good genetics runs in the family.

Joey October 4, 2006 at 3:08 pm

Funny, but the Nobel committee was pretty clear in saying that the crystallographic work by Kornberg, which is far more chemical, was instrumental in the prize.

anonymous October 4, 2006 at 10:34 pm

Has anyone read a good description of what it is about RNA transcription that he discovered? I read some things, and the press release, and it is unclear how this work is new. There’s a minor comment on how his pictures show “atoms”, but what does this mean?

If it’s the crystallographic technique that’s new, what about it, specifically? Because X ray crystallography certainly wouldn’t show atoms, but I can’t find a better description.

anonymous October 5, 2006 at 12:28 pm

could I have a source for those claims? a paper? something? And why is this X ray crystallography impressive, precisely?
again, a source?

Derek Lowe October 5, 2006 at 1:44 pm

Here’s a source on the uses of X-ray crystallography to determine the positions of atoms within large protein molecules:

http://www.cryst.bbk.ac.uk/BBS/whatis/cryst_an.html

A more detailed discussion is here:

http://www-structmed.cimr.cam.ac.uk/Course/Overview/Overview.html

As for Kornberg’s prize, remember, he’s not getting it just for managing to acquire a high-resolution X-ray structure. Many other proteins have been solved at the same level of detail. He’s being recognized for doing it to RNA polymerase, and using that data to work out how RNAPol does what it does. Here’s a discussion of the enzyme and of the Kornberg lab’s role in studying it:

http://www-ssrl.slac.stanford.edu/research/highlights_archive/rna_polymerase.html

Again, don’t confuse the tool with the discovery. Think about this year’s Physics prize as an analogy: satellites have been launched before, and radio astronomy has been done before. But the use of satellite-based radio astronomy to provide the strongest-ever confirmation of the Big Bang and set off new areas of work in cosmology – that’s worth a Nobel.

DK October 11, 2006 at 7:31 pm

I don’t believe in either the genetics or the genius of Nobel prize winners. In the age of capital-intensive, collaborative science, it’s the family connections that matter.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: