It may look like we are eating Chilean grapes, he [Pollan] argues, but in fact, once we
consider transportation costs, we are guzzling petroleum. Economics offers a
clearer view of what is going on. We do need to save energy, but it is difficult
for a central planner (or for that matter a food commentator) to identify what
is waste, relative to the costs of eliminating it….If fuel becomes more expensive, we’ll likely adopt peak-load
energy pricing, and drivers may scrap their SUVs for hybrids. But we probably
won’t plant grapes in our backyards. While we must conserve energy, we cut back
where it makes the most sense; grape-shipping is not the place to start. Global
trade does involve transportation costs, but it also puts food production where
it is cheapest, again saving energy by economizing on costs of labor,
irrigation, and fertilization, relative to the alternatives.
That’s the ever-wise Tyler reviewing the Omnivore’s Dilemma in Slate.
After energy, transportation and chemicals food is about the next most
energy intensive sector of the economy. My info on this is from the 1970s,
so I might have left out something.
I think you may have missed the point, don.
I agree with what Tyler Cowen states about this topic. Fuel prices do seem to be getting expensive but we still ship
grapes and other food products all over the globe. People may start trying to eat more healthy and try to save energy
but in the long run it is probably going to cost just as much to ship the healthier foods as it is other foods. When it
comes to organic farming which is probably a good thing, as more farms become big in organic farming, this is going to
cause the small and first organic farmers to go out of the business. However I do agree that as fuel prices are getting
more expensive, we do need to start looking for other alternatives. But when it comes to food, it seems as if the
cheapest food is the food that is going to get brought into the U.S.
An interesting aspect of all this is that freight has been becoming less expensive – and therefore a lower percentage of product cost – since containerization.
For many good, it is now almost negligible as part of the cost.
Grapes, which come in reefer (chilled) containers are more expensive to ship, but not outrageously so.
The idea of “food miles” (the distance food has come) is becoming popular in the UK but is a vast oversimplification.As someone pointed out (I can’t find the source) it probably uses more energy for someone to drive to the farmers’market that it did to ship food from overseas to the supermarket.
I think the lesson is: be careful of obvious targets.
One point that is often overlooked when talking about industrial agriculture is that the concept of localized agriculture as envisioned by it’s proponents lacks the historical precident they often assume it has. The spice trade, for example, predates recorded history. Many spices unambiguously taste better when fresh, yet people were willing of transportation methodto transport those spices immense distances using the most primitives in order to escape the limitations of the local growing conditions. Grain trading on the Mediterranean was significant as well under the Roman Empire due to some regions (such as the areas flooded by the Nile River) being much more efficient. Throughout history, foods have been acquired from as far away as transportation and preservation technologies have made it practical. Refridgeration and modern shipping techniques make it possible for us to get Chilean grapes, but in their absence, we’d still probably be consuming grapes from Chile, only they’d be made into raisins or wine so that they’d keep on the longer voyage.
Food that is cheap and abundant because people don’t pay for the externalities at the cash register is a scourge that we need to eliminate. I would like to be comparing the full costs of imported food (including environmental damage and health costs to food laborers and dissociation from the natural world) to the costs of local foods raised conscientiously. Then I would like people to choose based on flavor and nutrition.
Where do the local food proponents live?? I go to the farmer’s markets here in Chicago, they have some good stuff, but still, this is the upper midwest. To really go to a local growth only would consign most of us to the just eat bread era of right before the industrial revolution. We’d have to radically depopulate cities and spread out population. I prefer California wine to the swill they cook up in Michigan, thank you.
I agree that grapes grown on a vine in the backyard will taste better than Chilean grapes, but without the Industrial Ag system most would have little choices at all. It was bad enough growing up in a very rural town where the choices really were less than available in the city. I can only imagine what it would be like without the system that got us atleast fresh lettuce. No, wait, I can imagine because people were still ‘canning’ things from their gardens in jars, it sucks.
What happens if there’s a drought for this locally-
grown food – or ethanol?
If the sustainability crowd ever told the truth,
there’d be about 4 billion less on this planet and
we and the Jews would be the 1st voted off.
I despised working in the garden. I like being able
to eat food from around the world. I like my hybrid
flowers that can be grown in the upper midwest.
Socialism kills, free markets feed. This country
was built on trade. And I thought organic farming
used more water and land than industrial?
What is this fascination/romanced view w/living 2-300 years ago?
This argument about grapes reminds me of the old argument about email: one could argue that a piece of email costs the world gazillions – or it may cost essentially nothing. Does a grape cost vast sums because a trading infrastructure exists that allows it to be moved around, or does it cost very little because that infrastructure would be there anyway?
After all, the argument that it costs lots is based on the idea that that infrastructure should go away, meaning that world trade should be halted. Making the infrastructure more energy-efficient, or using better fuels for transport – sail-powered container-ships, etc – seems to not be the issue.
I also like that Tyler talked about “farms” versus “gardens”. Farming is a business, and a nasty, hard one at that. Gardens for anything other than the elite are a product of the Industrial Revolution, which allowed sufficient free resources for people to go “back to nature”. Gardens devoted to growing edible crops are still gardens – they aren’t done for trade or sustenance, but for some form of psychic gain.
One does not grow population-sustaining amounts of food in gardens – one needs farms. And farming is still nasty enough that most people get out of it at the first opportunity – just ask any Chinese peasant whether he would rather stay on his plot or go work in a sweatshop making stuff for Walmart. They’ve already voted for the sweatshop option by the tens of millions…
It seems to me that if you want to save energy growing your own grapes that is your own decision to make. However if you can not see the benefit from someone that is good a growing grapes spending their time doing that and you who I assume is not good a growing grapes doing something that you are good at the will be a greater benefit on both sides of the fence. This seems to be eluded to in the post and I agree. Countries should do what they are good at and create some kind of economy of scale for themselves and allow the others to do the same that way everyone can benefit as much as possible from trade and the energy cost will be negligable thanks to these economies.
The question of raising our own grapes ignores two points.
One is the seasonal nature of production. Use to be you
could only get fresh fruit and vegetables in season. Now
we import fresh fruit and vegetables from the southern
hemsiphere so we have fresh ones all year — one of the small
increases in living standards not captured by the cpi.
So much of the increased imports of foodstuffs is not displacing
or replacing domestic products, it is supplementing it.
Second is the alternative use of the land. One reaons grapefruit
production in moving from Florida to Brazil is that the Florida
land is more valuable for housing.
“If you eliminate non-local produce, you are saying that the 400,000 people in Minneapolis should eat only canned or frozen produce for five months of the year.”
No local food activists that I’m aware of are absolutist in that sense. In fact, I think many are very flexible as to how to define ‘local.’ But obviously this isn’t an all-or-nothing proposition here. I grew up in Central California – a place that grows much of the fresh fruit in the US. Yet, walk into a grocery store and you will be hard pressed to find what is so abundant outside. Instead: grapes from Chile, Oranges from Argentina, and lettuce from mexico. Something’s wrong here. These rational actors at the supermarket are not taking into account the full cost of their purchases.
I actually just read Omnivore’s Dilemma and appreciated it a great deal. Tyler accuses Pollan of “fuzzy nostalgia for the preindustrial past” which is probably true – and the book also has too much gratuitous leftism for me. But it is a shame that Tyler didn’t address the central criticisms in the book.
I found the part about Joel Salatin’s farm to be most convincing. Can America practice sustainability and be more productive than industrial agriculture? Absolutely. Read the book.
I didn’t mean that all farms could produce high quality grass pastures, and in turn high production of beef, chicken, etc. I meant that given almost any agricultural environment (Any that I am familiar with anyway) farming practices could be modified for sustainability with no drop in production. (Whether the farmer is willing to put in the hard work required is another question.)
The only point I am trying to make is that sustainability and production are not at odds – in fact, there is good reason to suspect a positive correlation.
My friend Susan was a lady with a tender and soft heart. She had a troubled childhood and due to her past experiences she used to suffer from anxiety disorder. Being doctor, I decided to help her in her anxiety attacks, I asked her to buy xanax. This is the most useful drug for treating panic and anxiety disorder, so order xanax or alprazolam. The information for medication is available online; you can type xanax online on the Google bar and search. I asked her to buy xanax online so that she could avail the best deal and get cheap xanax. Thereafter, she has come back to her normal loving self; she is now a mother of one baby boy and a happy wife! Susan is thinking of starting a boutique. Thanks to xanax!!
It is a straight fact that women are adequately capable of measuring the sexual attractiveness of a male and as such it is urgently necessary for you to get rid of the shackles of erectile dysfunction with the help of cheap levitra so that you no longer confront your girl with diminished sexuality. You can buy levitra online as well as order levitra from the nearest drug store and secure yourself against the threat of erectile dysfunction. Moreover, if you buy levitra through levitra online, cheap levitra would be delivered at your doorstep. So, what’s stopping you? Buy levitra and get rid of erectile dysfunction!
debt consolidation Today student loan debt consolidation is a big debt free issue in the United States. consolidating debt Most students in the US pursue debt consolidation loan further studies through external finance. bad credit debtThe government debt free too pumps in millions of dollars into the economy to finance these studies and provide a congenial environment for proper and high class study to the students. cheap debt consolidationEvery student has a different set of financial requirement. There are several mortgage refinance organizations and student loan best debt consolidation consolidation companies, which provide student debt consolidation. debt consolidation help There are several programs for credit card debt individual needs debt help of the student. The result of all the programs is similar. All the programs work debt consolidation help towards designing debt consolidation online a payment plan suiting your individual needs in which the program will merge all your student loan existing loans into a single consolidate debt sum and reduce your existing interest rate in an effort to bring the repayment debt consolidation help monthly installment to a sum debt consolidation solution which you can pay easily with your existing income.debt plan
credit card debt
Hi, my friends and I really amused by your work Bred Simpson
This is a very good site. It assists me find lots of information on one site. Usually when I am surfing I can find nothing of the kind I want, but this site, gives me lots of ideas on whatever I need to know about him. pharmacy drug store ed treatment Levirta
Order Levitra online. Thanks.
A very informative and helpful blog. Enjoyed reading it and the tips were great and truely helpful. Keep it up.
Blog bookmarked and emailed to some friends. online roulette
wholesale jewelry
jewelry wholesale
Weight loss is easier than you think!
Adipex
Phentermine
Hello!
very nice post… enjoyed it very much.
Thank you
http://www.best-tutor.com
good site
tutor
tutor
Comments on this entry are closed.