…the decline in hours worked in Europe is almost entirely accounted for
by the fact that Europe develops a much smaller service sector than the
US.
Here is the paper.
by Tyler Cowen on February 13, 2007 at 7:43 am in Economics | Permalink
…the decline in hours worked in Europe is almost entirely accounted for
by the fact that Europe develops a much smaller service sector than the
US.
Here is the paper.
Previous post: Are the British genetically capitalist?
Next post: Assorted links













Get smart with the Thesis WordPress Theme from DIYthemes.
So more work is done in the home, outside the market, thus foregoing the benefits of division of labour and specialization? Or is it that higher marginal tax rates drive more services into the underground economy?
I’m not sure I understand the sentence. Did they mean to say “developed” and not “develops?” It doesn’t seem like there is agreement between “hours worked” and “develops.”
Any help would be appreciated.
Dan Karreman: because it’s compared to the US, which underwent the same shift. If the timings were different, then it would be a terrible comparison, but I think they were comparable.
Comments on this entry are closed.