The John Edwards health insurance plan

by on February 7, 2007 at 6:58 am in Economics | Permalink

Kevin Drum writes:

John Edwards’ new healthcare proposal is, basically, an individual mandate (everyone is required to get health insurance coverage somehow) combined with community rating (private insurers have to take all comers, regardless of medical condition) and government subsidies (the feds will pay for insurance if you’re too poor to afford it).  Private insurance would be available through a mechanism Edwards calls "Health Markets."

Edwards is honest enough to tell us this will raise our taxes.  Kevin Drum is honest and he tells us that the best hope for this plan is evolution toward a single-payer system.  Here is Matt Yglesias, here is Ezra, here is more

Loyal MR readers will know that I do not favor a single payer system but I can appreciate its logic.  If we are going to regulate insurance companies very heavily, they become a superfluous middleman and a source of manipulation, while yielding few offsetting benefits. 

In the United States doctors (check out those wages) and insurance companies are far more politically powerful than elsewhere.  You might think that makes our health care system worse, if so it will make our health care reforms worse too.  If anything happens, those groups will have a veto, more or less, on the distribution of the resulting rents.

I believe that the best and most intelligent Democratic bloggers are already rooting for an evolutionary path whereby the first-step reforms — whether at the state or federal level — eventually succeed only by making matters intolerable and unprofitable for doctors, insurance companies, and perhaps hospitals as well.  After profits have suffered enough, perhaps everyone will see the light at the end of the tunnel and simply abolish those nasty private health insurance companies.

Given how politics actually works, I do not consider this a promising sign for the future of American health care reform.

Addendum: I did very much enjoy reading the first comment left on this post…

Person February 7, 2007 at 9:37 am

Private insurance would be available through a mechanism Edwards calls “Health Markets.”

Did anyone else crack up at reading this? Let me guess:

“Patients and insurers will reward health care providers with what Edwards calls ‘Money.’ Americans will monitor their health through what Edwards calls ‘Doctor Visits.’ They will secure access to this money through a mechanism Edwards calls ‘Having a Job.’ Decision to provide or purchase various medical service will be determined by what Edwards calls ‘Supply and Demand.’ People will arrive at health care providers in what Edwards calls ‘Vehicles.’”

Chris February 7, 2007 at 12:31 pm

Alkali – current health care regulation mandates minimum amounts of coverage so that everyone is buying “cadillac” coverage. Additionally, there are severe barriers to entry.

The de-regulation would have to allow new entrants and allow companies to provide a wider array of services.

SamChevre February 7, 2007 at 1:05 pm

What benefits do they yield if we don’t regulate them very heavily?

If left to do their job, they eliminate (or reduce) UNPREDICTABLE risks. Since most people are risk-averse, this is a considerable benefit.

(It’s a benefit to me to have car insurance; I pay the expected cost of my damage, and get the actual cost–the expected cost is predictable, so it is mcuh less risky.)

Shmuel February 7, 2007 at 2:15 pm

As my friend John says, “If anyone thinks there’s a health insurance crisis they can sit next to me as I call 100 leads and talk to 95 people with absolutely zero interest in either saving money or getting health insurance.”

Chris Prottas February 7, 2007 at 8:01 pm

Health Care plans also could serve a purpose by using their expertise to come up with plans that deliver the best value for money. In a healthy market, health care plans would deliver considerable value as the patients’ advocate to find a package of care that matches their needs with the best available care from all over the United States for the best price. Unfortunately, the incentives of the current health care system are not aligned in this manner, so health care plans join suppliers and providers in a game of hot-potato cost-shifting.

Floccina February 8, 2007 at 12:03 pm

BTW A single payer cannot negotiate price properly. It has too much power and can almost dictate price. This creates shortages and surpluses and disincentive to innovation or too much incentive to innovation.

So competing insurance companies serve us by negotiating price.

Mitch February 9, 2007 at 4:55 am

An over powerful single payer can have serious unintended consequence on the system. Doctors are free agents and will respond to a heavy-handed monolith in ways that may not be best for patients (e.g. retire early, change what services they offer, stop taking one or another kind of insurance, change specialties or towns, etc). Medicare has had their fair share of access problems because of this.

Also, as long as Americans can sue for huge amounts for any bad outcome and so long as they expect the cadolac of care, it is going to be impossible to affort care for everyone. We need a baseline of care with liability protection to affort universal care, even if it means a two tiered system.

kurt jarcik March 30, 2007 at 10:29 am

Easystm.com will give Coverage of short term health insurance as early as the next day… just a few simple medical questions to answer. Best of all, you can choose to receive your policy electronically!

http://www.easystm.com

Jon September 4, 2007 at 3:27 pm

Federal law doesn’t require any insurer to offer any particular amount of coverage,

Maybe not, but certain state laws do. Particularly in my state…Oregon. “Basic” or “limited” plans are not allowed.

32rrfrtg October 7, 2007 at 11:03 pm
batteries October 16, 2007 at 11:25 am
hoojk December 2, 2007 at 9:09 pm

吴尊
阿穆隆
林志玲
尚雯婕
大人物
王睿
Mac DVD Ripper
火狐浏览器
Firefox浏览器
吴尊
阿穆隆
林志玲
尚雯婕
大人物
王睿
Mac DVD Ripper
火狐浏览器
Firefox浏览器
吴尊
阿穆隆
林志玲
尚雯婕
大人物
王睿
Mac DVD Ripper
火狐浏览器
Firefox浏览器
吴尊
阿穆隆
林志玲
尚雯婕
大人物
王睿
Mac DVD Ripper
火狐浏览器
Firefox浏览器
吴尊
阿穆隆
林志玲
尚雯婕
大人物
王睿
Mac DVD Ripper
火狐浏览器
Firefox浏览器
吴尊
阿穆隆
林志玲
尚雯婕
大人物
王睿
Mac DVD Ripper
火狐浏览器
Firefox浏览器
吴尊
阿穆隆
林志玲
尚雯婕
大人物
王睿
Mac DVD Ripper
火狐浏览器
Firefox浏览器
吴尊
阿穆隆
林志玲
尚雯婕
大人物
王睿
Mac DVD Ripper
火狐浏览器
Firefox浏览器
吴尊
阿穆隆
林志玲
尚雯婕
大人物
王睿
Mac DVD Ripper
火狐浏览器
Firefox浏览器
吴尊
阿穆隆
林志玲
尚雯婕
大人物
王睿
Mac DVD Ripper
火狐浏览器
Firefox浏览器
吴尊
阿穆隆
林志玲
尚雯婕
大人物
王睿
Mac DVD Ripper
火狐浏览器
Firefox浏览器
吴尊
阿穆隆
林志玲
尚雯婕
大人物
王睿
Mac DVD Ripper
火狐浏览器
Firefox浏览器
吴尊
阿穆隆
林志玲
尚雯婕
大人物
王睿
Mac DVD Ripper
火狐浏览器
Firefox浏览器
吴尊
阿穆隆
林志玲
尚雯婕
大人物
王睿
Mac DVD Ripper
火狐浏览器
Firefox浏览器
吴尊
阿穆隆
林志玲
尚雯婕
大人物
王睿
Mac DVD Ripper
火狐浏览器
Firefox浏览器
吴尊
阿穆隆
林志玲
尚雯婕
大人物
王睿
Mac DVD Ripper
火狐浏览器
Firefox浏览器
吴尊
阿穆隆
林志玲
尚雯婕
大人物
王睿
Mac DVD Ripper
火狐浏览器
Firefox浏览器
吴尊
阿穆隆
林志玲
尚雯婕
大人物
王睿
Mac DVD Ripper
火狐浏览器
Firefox浏览器
吴尊
阿穆隆
林志玲
尚雯婕
大人物
王睿
Mac DVD Ripper
火狐浏览器
Firefox浏览器
吴尊
阿穆隆
林志玲
尚雯婕
大人物
王睿
Mac DVD Ripper
火狐浏览器
Firefox浏览器
吴尊
阿穆隆
林志玲
尚雯婕
大人物
王睿
Mac DVD Ripper
火狐浏览器
Firefox浏览器
吴尊
阿穆隆
林志玲
尚雯婕
大人物
王睿
Mac DVD Ripper
火狐浏览器
Firefox浏览器
吴尊
阿穆隆
林志玲
尚雯婕
大人物
王睿
Mac DVD Ripper
火狐浏览器
Firefox浏览器
吴尊
阿穆隆
林志玲
尚雯婕
大人物
王睿
Mac DVD Ripper
火狐浏览器
Firefox浏览器
吴尊
阿穆隆
林志玲
尚雯婕
大人物
王睿
Mac DVD Ripper
火狐浏览器
Firefox浏览器
吴尊
阿穆隆
林志玲
尚雯婕
大人物
王睿
Mac DVD Ripper
火狐浏览器
Firefox浏览器
吴尊
阿穆隆
林志玲
尚雯婕
大人物
王睿
Mac DVD Ripper
火狐浏览器
Firefox浏览器
吴尊
阿穆隆
林志玲
尚雯婕
大人物
王睿
Mac DVD Ripper
火狐浏览器
Firefox浏览器
吴尊
阿穆隆
林志玲
尚雯婕
大人物
王睿
Mac DVD Ripper
火狐浏览器
Firefox浏览器
吴尊
阿穆隆
林志玲
尚雯婕
大人物
王睿
Mac DVD Ripper
火狐浏览器
Firefox浏览器
吴尊
阿穆隆
林志玲
尚雯婕
大人物
王睿
Mac DVD Ripper
火狐浏览器
Firefox浏览器
吴尊
阿穆隆
林志玲
尚雯婕
大人物
王睿
Mac DVD Ripper
火狐浏览器
Firefox浏览器
v

不動産投資 July 15, 2008 at 2:50 am

資金を増やそうとするのに不動産投資をするのが手っ取り早い。日本で不動産で東京 賃貸をさがすのはきわめて難しくシステム開発は日本の会社が良い。

likaida March 16, 2009 at 10:56 pm
likaida March 16, 2009 at 10:59 pm
likaida March 16, 2009 at 11:03 pm
jad games February 9, 2010 at 1:42 pm

thank you very much

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: