Can a mosque be sexy? Yes.

by on August 1, 2007 at 7:07 am in Travels | Permalink

Bluemosque1_edited
The Sultanahmet Camii or "Blue Mosque" in Istanbul.

Chris Smith August 1, 2007 at 7:30 am

Dude, that started out as a church, aka The Hagia Sophia.

Anonymous August 1, 2007 at 8:50 am

I keep saying it… Alex’s posts are more and more Tyler’esque!

jb August 1, 2007 at 9:07 am

I prefer the Yeni Cami myself.

Anonymous August 1, 2007 at 9:34 am

Unfortunately Hagia Sofia that was build as an Christian Temple has been left to disintegrate and is not allowed to be restored by Turkish Authorities…

fustercluck August 1, 2007 at 10:03 am

The most unique feature of the blue mosque, unviewable in that photo, is its 6 minarets. Most have 2, though 4 isn’t uncommon.

When in Istanbul, I was told that the number of minarets signals the importance of the mosque in the Islamic world community. I’m not entirely convinced that’s true though…any Islamic scholars?

Mary August 1, 2007 at 10:52 am

Am I the only one appalled by the disrespectful title of this post?

The photograph is indeed beautiful, but surely there is a less offensive way to describe it.

rick August 1, 2007 at 11:49 am

Wow. You have guts. “Mosque” and “sexy” in the same sentence could be grounds for muslims blowing themselves up.

Bahira Elkilany August 1, 2007 at 12:30 pm

I’d like to clarify that The Blue Mosque is seperate completely than Aya
Sophia. They are two seperate buildings. Moreover, I don’t think sexy is
a proper description for a mosque or for any religious building.

Bahira Elkilany August 1, 2007 at 12:32 pm

I’d like to clarify that The Blue Mosque is seperate completely than Aya
Sophia. They are two seperate buildings. Moreover, I don’t think sexy is
a proper description for a mosque or for any religious building.

Anderson August 1, 2007 at 12:39 pm

Moreover, I don’t think sexy is a proper description for a mosque or for any religious building.

We cross-commented, Bahira; but *any* religious building? There are surely a few temples in India that would challenge your generalization.

Melvin August 1, 2007 at 1:06 pm

There must be something that Alex is doing and Tyler is not that allows Tyler to post exponentially more than Alex – what is it?

Save the English Language August 1, 2007 at 3:44 pm

Although I am unsure of Alex’s intentions, I do not see that “sexy” is necessarily inappropriate. An alternate meaning is “glamorous”. With this meaning, the title of the post has a certain amount of irony; consider the juxtaposition of a glamorous place of worship with a religion that, for instance, covers its women in burkas.

The use of “sexy” in non-sexual statements is, in my expereience, much more common in the UK than it is here.

fustercluck August 1, 2007 at 3:59 pm

More recently, it became a museum.

TT August 2, 2007 at 8:13 am

Mary,

you are absolutely right and not alone.

djg August 2, 2007 at 3:56 pm

This is not the Blue Mosque! This is the Hagia Sophia. The Blue Mosque is across the street (and has 6 minarets).

TJIC August 3, 2007 at 9:22 am

Bulent writes:

Um, isn’t gluttony just as sinful as lust? Would people be making noises had Alex called the building ‘appetizing’?

I’m not upset at “sexy”, nor would I bet upset at “appetizing”…however, I think that both terms are too sensuous / carnal for a relatively “cool” medium like architecture.

I can easily support the interchangeable use of the words “sexy” and “appetizing” to describe either a good looking woman and a good looking desert.

So: my objection to the wordchoice is not prudery, but one of categories.

More on the topic here.

djg August 4, 2007 at 8:56 am

My bad, Alex, I just remember the mosque looking very different live than it does in this picture. What are your views on the Suleimanye?

无缝钢管 November 13, 2007 at 8:48 pm

Hi Best wishes。Allow me to offer my heartiest wishes.xicao loves-流水线娱乐博客常年提供高、中、低压锅炉钢管、流体钢管、结构钢管、化肥专用钢管、石油裂化钢管、地质钢管、液压支柱钢管及合金钢管-无缝管-无缝钢管等论文发表资讯/刊物信息,协助客户制定论文发表方案

翻译公司 February 13, 2008 at 10:29 am

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: