Venezuela fact of the day

by on August 21, 2007 at 4:46 pm in Data Source | Permalink

…despite Chavez’s "revolution for the poor" the Gini coefficient [in Venezuela] has increased from 0.44 in 2000 to 0.48 in 2005.

Here is the post and source.

Christopher Monnier August 21, 2007 at 5:13 pm

You don’t say…

dearieme August 21, 2007 at 6:03 pm

A Gini tonic?

Per Kurowski August 21, 2007 at 8:07 pm

Part of it has to do that after soon nine years of chávez´s “socialist government† gas is sold at less than 12 US cents per gallon, less that its direct cost of distribution and with this about 10% of GDP is transferred from those who have nothing to those who buy gasoline. Annual gasoline subsidies amount to US$ 3.000 per car.

JSK August 21, 2007 at 9:31 pm

Hmm… didn’t Venezuela go through a serious recession during 2003? So, taking this five year interval isn’t really an accurate (not to mention honest) way of measuring?

Stan August 21, 2007 at 9:55 pm

Perhaps this is evidence that Hugo Chavez believes a rising tides raises all boats? Just kidding. It is evidence that not only is the revolution for the poor a poor idea but they might be experiencing a crony-type environment.

J. August 22, 2007 at 8:41 am

I don’t see the relevance of this post for a critique of Chavez. We all know that left-wing leaders are to be judged by their stated intentions and never by their achievements.

John Pertz August 22, 2007 at 9:01 am

A left wing leader who hasnt cured poverty, who would of ever thought that? I am a bit shocked because I always thought that one of the benefits of modern day left wing leaders is their penchant for dolling out dollars downward. At the very least you would of thought that all of this current short-run redistribution by Chavez would have eaten into the gini coefficient a small bit.

Mike Huben August 22, 2007 at 9:16 am

(Gack: my comment was truncated at the URL. I’ll try again.)

http://lanr.blogspot.com/2006/04/venezuelan-presidential-candidate.html

The idea that Chavez is solely responsible for the Gini coefficient (as implied in the quote) is stupid on its face, but typical of propaganda. How does an economist like Tyler (who should know better) excuse this sort of lapse?

Thelonious_Nick August 22, 2007 at 12:22 pm

Alas for those of us who are highly skeptical about Hugo Chavez, but this information seems to be incorrect. I expect that most will find the UN Humand Development Report to be a fairly neutral source.

According to the 2006 UN Human Development Report, Venezuela’s Gini coefficient was 44.1. According to the 2001 UNHDR, it was 48.8. Thus, it seems to be going down.

http://hdr.undp.org/hdr2006/ (see page 336)

http://hdr.undp.org/reports/global/2001/en/ (see human development indicators, page 53)

Foobarista August 22, 2007 at 1:20 pm

The standing question: why are so many people on the net infatuated with the Mugabe of the Andes? By the time he’s done with the place, Venezuelans will be lucky if their GDP is above North Korea’s.

He’s, sadly, only one of several prototypes for my Ten Step Plan to becoming an entrenched dictator.

effell August 24, 2007 at 10:24 am

To happyjuggler: you’re wrong in not caring about inequality.

Unequal societies function much better politically: they’re more stable and the way they’re setup virtually assures good governance. They’re also at a big advantage in a knowledge-based world economy, which is really not about the skill level of the average worker. Finally, on top, they’re comfy.

world of warcraft November 26, 2007 at 11:33 pm
lotro gold January 14, 2008 at 1:15 am

good satie very nice

鑽石 April 2, 2008 at 9:58 pm
Rasmussen January 7, 2010 at 11:15 am

“To happyjuggler: you’re wrong in not caring about inequality.

Unequal societies function much better politically: they’re more stable and the way they’re setup virtually assures good governance. They’re also at a big advantage in a knowledge-based world economy, which is really not about the skill level of the average worker. Finally, on top, they’re comfy.

Denmark has one of the lowest gini in the world. In Denmark we have lots of social capital (trust in each other). Virtually no corruption and stable society and workforce like none other place in the world.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: