…despite Chavez’s "revolution for the poor" the Gini coefficient [in Venezuela] has increased from 0.44 in 2000 to 0.48 in 2005.
Here is the post and source.
by Tyler Cowen on August 21, 2007 at 4:46 pm in Data Source | Permalink
…despite Chavez’s "revolution for the poor" the Gini coefficient [in Venezuela] has increased from 0.44 in 2000 to 0.48 in 2005.
Here is the post and source.
Previous post: A Farewell to Alms, pp.1-112
Next post: BookForum













Get smart with the Thesis WordPress Theme from DIYthemes.
You don’t say…
A Gini tonic?
Part of it has to do that after soon nine years of chávez´s “socialist government† gas is sold at less than 12 US cents per gallon, less that its direct cost of distribution and with this about 10% of GDP is transferred from those who have nothing to those who buy gasoline. Annual gasoline subsidies amount to US$ 3.000 per car.
Hmm… didn’t Venezuela go through a serious recession during 2003? So, taking this five year interval isn’t really an accurate (not to mention honest) way of measuring?
Perhaps this is evidence that Hugo Chavez believes a rising tides raises all boats? Just kidding. It is evidence that not only is the revolution for the poor a poor idea but they might be experiencing a crony-type environment.
I don’t see the relevance of this post for a critique of Chavez. We all know that left-wing leaders are to be judged by their stated intentions and never by their achievements.
A left wing leader who hasnt cured poverty, who would of ever thought that? I am a bit shocked because I always thought that one of the benefits of modern day left wing leaders is their penchant for dolling out dollars downward. At the very least you would of thought that all of this current short-run redistribution by Chavez would have eaten into the gini coefficient a small bit.
(Gack: my comment was truncated at the URL. I’ll try again.)
http://lanr.blogspot.com/2006/04/venezuelan-presidential-candidate.html
The idea that Chavez is solely responsible for the Gini coefficient (as implied in the quote) is stupid on its face, but typical of propaganda. How does an economist like Tyler (who should know better) excuse this sort of lapse?
Alas for those of us who are highly skeptical about Hugo Chavez, but this information seems to be incorrect. I expect that most will find the UN Humand Development Report to be a fairly neutral source.
According to the 2006 UN Human Development Report, Venezuela’s Gini coefficient was 44.1. According to the 2001 UNHDR, it was 48.8. Thus, it seems to be going down.
http://hdr.undp.org/hdr2006/ (see page 336)
http://hdr.undp.org/reports/global/2001/en/ (see human development indicators, page 53)
The standing question: why are so many people on the net infatuated with the Mugabe of the Andes? By the time he’s done with the place, Venezuelans will be lucky if their GDP is above North Korea’s.
He’s, sadly, only one of several prototypes for my Ten Step Plan to becoming an entrenched dictator.
To happyjuggler: you’re wrong in not caring about inequality.
Unequal societies function much better politically: they’re more stable and the way they’re setup virtually assures good governance. They’re also at a big advantage in a knowledge-based world economy, which is really not about the skill level of the average worker. Finally, on top, they’re comfy.
power leveling
powerleveling
world of warcraft power leveling
ffxi power leveling
ffxi powerleveling
lotro powerleveling
lotro power leveling
power leveling
powerleveling
world of warcraft power leveling
ffxi power leveling
ffxi powerleveling
ffxi
ffxi gil
lotro powerleveling
lotro power leveling
lotro gold
power leveling
powerleveling
world of warcraft power leveling
powerleveln
power leveln
world of warcraft power leveln
world of warcraft powerleveln
ffxi powerleveling
coh powerleveling
cov power leveling
good satie very nice
徵信社
徵信
徵信社
“To happyjuggler: you’re wrong in not caring about inequality.
Unequal societies function much better politically: they’re more stable and the way they’re setup virtually assures good governance. They’re also at a big advantage in a knowledge-based world economy, which is really not about the skill level of the average worker. Finally, on top, they’re comfy.
”
Denmark has one of the lowest gini in the world. In Denmark we have lots of social capital (trust in each other). Virtually no corruption and stable society and workforce like none other place in the world.
Comments on this entry are closed.