How to Read The Bible, by James Kugel.
I’m not even going to give you a pithy excerpt or try to find the right adjectives. It is simply so, so, so good. If you wish to learn more, here is a NYT review.
As long as we are on the topic of very good books, there is a new and very nice hardcover edition of Adam Smith’s The Wealth of Nations.
















Have you ever read God, A Biography? It treats God as a literary character as the basis for analysis of the Old Testament. I’m curious as to how Kugel’s book compares. (I lost interest in Miles’ book after 200 pages or so…there’s surprisingly little of God in the Bible and all the guessing as to His purposes got a little tiresome.)
I’m extraordinarily disappointed that Amazon’s “expedited” international shipping could still take almost a month. And I’m moving on Saturday to a new town and have no idea what if any bookstores will indulge me to order it.
I seem to remember watching this talk on YouTube just the other day about how a good alternative to traditional charity is often just to send a gift to some needy soul halfway around the world. I can’t remember the speaker’s name, but he seemed a decent kind of fellow, the type that might be willing to send a poor young ex-pat living in Germany a random act of kindness–especially given that the fellow could be sure the ex-pat would value the gift at least at 100% of the cost to give it.
Even, say, a signed copy of a recently written book would be valued highly by the ex-pat.
Not that he’s begging for it or anything–he’d never want to be rewarded for that.
I’m sure many people will be impressed with the “scholarship” that Kugel crams into his book, but does Kugel ever mention that several schools of Biblical scholarship exist that contradict each other’s findings as much as the differing schools of economics, especially Austrian and Keynesian, contradict each other? For every scholar who defends the documentary hypothesis of Genesis, another scholar equally qualified attacks it.
So Kugel has decided to side with the “scholars” who attack the historicity of the Bible? What is so new or amazing about that? “Scholars” have done that for the past 200 years. Other scholars, using the same tools that Kugel’s scholars use, have proven the OT to be amazingly accurate historically. Does one scholar see contradictions and impossibilities? Another finds the same passages contain amazing paradoxes and deep insights.
Just out of curiosity, I would like to know if Tyler has ever read any scholarship that defends the accuracy and historicity of the Bible? If not, why not? Would you consider yourself educated in economics if you didn’t know at least some aspects of Keynesian, neo-classical and Austrian econ?
I encourage everyone to read Kugel’s book. Then read the Wikipedia entries on “The Bible and History” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Bible_and_history and “The Documentary Hypothesis” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Documentary_hypothesis. Both articles seem to give a balanced view of the opposing sides in the argument with bibliographies for further reading.
For every scholar who defends the documentary hypothesis of Genesis, another scholar equally qualified attacks it.
So Kugel has decided to side with the “scholars” who attack the historicity of the Bible?
What’s with the scare quotes around scholars? You just said the documentary folks are as qualified as the non-documentary folks.
The bible can in fact be 100% historically accurate and written by multiple authors without any divine inspiration.
Instead, Kugel tries to separate scholarship and belief. At bottom, Kugel seems to conclude that, scholarship be damned, there is some seed of divine inspiration in the Bible, even if he can’t say exactly where it is
Meh.
Not to detract from the considerable and important work done by James Kugel, but a lot of this territory was covered in “Asimov’s Guide to the Bible” by Isaac Asimov, written in two parts in 1967 and 1969. Check it out.
Why not just ask the Pope? He’s infallible, you know.
I come from asia, injoy 室內è¨è¨ˆ,work in a æ¬å®¶å…¬å¸,other enjoy isecosway和科士å¨,good see U。
Thanks.
这家翻译公å¸|f深圳翻译good深圳翻译公å¸|优秀åŒå£°ä¼ 译
èŠ±è“®æ—…éŠæ™¯é»ž,花蓮,花æ±,租車,花蓮 租車,èŠ±æ±æ—…éŠ,花蓮租車公å¸,花蓮旅行社,花蓮租車網,花蓮行程,花蓮地圖,花蓮租車公å¸,租車,花蓮租車旅éŠç¶²,花蓮 租車,花蓮旅éŠç§Ÿè»Š,花蓮租車資訊網,æ—…éŠæ™¯é»ž,租車旅éŠ,租車公å¸,租車網,花蓮包車,花蓮旅éŠ,租車 花蓮,花蓮旅éŠç¶²,賞鯨,花蓮旅éŠç§Ÿè»Š,租車,花蓮租車旅éŠ,花蓮租車公å¸,花蓮租車旅éŠè³‡è¨Šç¶²,花蓮租車旅éŠ,æ—…éŠ,èŠ±è“®æ—…éŠæ™¯é»ž,èŠ±æ±æ—…éŠ,花蓮泛舟,租車旅éŠ,花蓮租車,賞鯨,花蓮泛舟,花蓮溯溪,花蓮旅éŠ,租車,花蓮租車,花蓮租車,花蓮租車,花蓮租車,花蓮一日éŠ,花蓮租車公å¸,花蓮租車,花蓮租車,花蓮一日éŠ,花蓮租車,花蓮旅éŠåœ°åœ–,花蓮租車,花蓮行程,花蓮租車
花蓮å‰å®‰æ…¶ä¿®é™¢,花蓮景點,花蓮旅éŠ,花蓮,é¯‰éšæ½,花蓮太é¯é–£,ç ‚å¡ç¤‘,åˆæ¡å±±,乿›²æ´ž,七星柴éšåšç‰©é¤¨,花蓮碼é ,ç‘žç©—ç‰§å ´,å°æ±æ™¯é»ž,安通溫泉,èŠ±è“®æ—…éŠæ™¯é»ž,ç«‹å·æ¼å ´,太é¯é–£,太é¯é–£è±ç„¶äº,å°æ±æ—…éŠæ™¯é»ž,七星æ½
Comments on this entry are closed.