The Golden Compass

by on December 8, 2007 at 9:30 am in The Arts | Permalink

It lacks direction.

Dima December 8, 2007 at 10:17 am

It has some pretty scenes, and the actors did what they do, but the storyline was so fluid that it resembled a dream. Too condensed.

tom s. December 8, 2007 at 11:01 am

That’s too bad. I love the books (and not only as “children’s” books – I just think they are a fine read) and was really looking forward to the film. I’ll probably still go and see it, but the fault is sadly predictable. You can’t fit a 400 page book into a movie-length treatment without lopping out big bits of storyline, which is probably why the most successful adaptations have always either been done from short books or have taken liberties with plot.

*Minor spoiler alert for those who have read the book*

I understand they stopped the story short of the end of the book. I don’t understand how they can do that without changing the presentation of many of the characters and the meaning of many events. Guess I’ll have to go and see it and find out.

shirley December 8, 2007 at 12:00 pm

Being a Christian grade school teacher, I read it to understand what all the hoopla was about. I’m disappointed; there is actually not much in the Compass to challenge anyone’s faith, but it does tease those Christians addicted to the power of the Church. It’s not anti-Christian at all, it’s anti-Church, anti-injustice. I think anyone who’s scared of the Compass should read it immediately. The key storyline, that of separating innocents from their souls, reminded me of what many Catholic church leaders did to native Canadian children, as recently as 40 years ago.

enrique December 8, 2007 at 1:11 pm

I haven’t seen it yet (in puerto rico, US films are distributed one or two weeks after their US release), but my test of any film, book, or work of art is: is the work so bad that it should not have been made in the first place (since those resources used in making it could have been to some other use). Admittedly, my test is a quite liberal and forgoving one, but I should disclose that I don’t have a TV – that’s why I love going to the movies, art museums, bookstores, etc.

Urstoff December 8, 2007 at 2:46 pm
Ellen December 8, 2007 at 3:04 pm

the book was amazing, the rest of the trilogy even more so. problem is that the best part is the depth of the story and charaters and the creation of a whole new world w/ its own history and culture. to present this in a hollywood film would be almost impossible. honestly it would have to be bigger scale than Peter Jackson’s LotR. and that kind of budget and time will never exist for any book lesser known than Tolkien.

Chewxy December 9, 2007 at 2:37 am

Ellen: So God and his angels are made of Dust. Big effing deal. Seriously, I don’t see why that is balsphemous. Afterall, scientists do speculate on anything, so why not speculate on the subject of God (whether He/She/It exists is another matter) as well?

It becomes blind faith if you don’t question. And people with blind faith? Lemme name some: Osama, and all the suicide bombers.

ellen December 10, 2007 at 12:20 pm

chewxy:
1: i didn’t say blasphemy was bad or blind faith was good, i said that if shirly wants to be more shocked she should finish the trilogy
2: (spoiler alert) i don’t think its the Dust thats the issue, its god being a puppet/ cover of a malevolent angel…

无缝钢管 December 13, 2007 at 2:02 am

Hi Allow me to offer my heartiest wishes. I would like to know more about this I’m an chinese writer who love to read international literature.feel free to contact by sdggc and bjseek-无缝管|无缝钢管|数据恢复|RAID数据恢复

rc March 17, 2009 at 5:34 am
花蓮租車 August 12, 2009 at 3:56 am

花蓮租車公司,花蓮旅遊租車,花蓮,租車,花蓮租車公司,花蓮旅遊,花蓮租車公司,行易花蓮租車,租車網,花蓮旅遊租車,花蓮租車,花蓮,花蓮,租車,花蓮 租車,泛舟,花蓮租車,泛舟,花蓮溯溪,花蓮泛舟行程,花蓮溯溪旅遊,租車,花蓮一日遊,租車,花蓮旅遊,花蓮租車網,花蓮租車旅遊網,花蓮一日遊,花蓮租車公司,花蓮 旅遊 租車,花蓮 租車,花蓮,花蓮租車網,租車,花蓮 租車,花蓮租車,花蓮美食,花蓮租車,花蓮租車,花蓮租車,花蓮旅遊,花蓮租車,花蓮租車,租車,花蓮租車,花蓮租車,花蓮租車,花蓮旅遊,花蓮租車,花蓮租車,花蓮 租車,旅遊,花蓮,租車,花蓮旅遊,花蓮,租車,旅遊,地圖,花東,租車

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: