Razib writes:
The
researchers’ hypothesis was that in religious kibbutzim men would be
better collaborators (and thus would take less) than women, while in
secular kibbutzim men and women would take about the same. And that was exactly what happened.
Here is more, interesting throughout.
Source article from the Economist.
yes
Yes, but as the article in the Economist notes, the men were expected to pray thrice daily in groups of at least ten. The women had no similar expectation for repeated collaborative group prayer.
But is it men controlling other men, or indirectly, women controlling men, or even, men failing to control women, or through control failing to actually control them?
Do you mean that Scott Adams was right in The Dilbert Future?
Comments on this entry are closed.