This is stupid but it makes me laugh the more I think about it. The original idea is due to Claude Shannon. Hat tip to Boing Boing.
by Alex Tabarrok on April 24, 2008 at 2:10 pm in The Arts | Permalink
This is stupid but it makes me laugh the more I think about it. The original idea is due to Claude Shannon. Hat tip to Boing Boing.
Previous post: Is Richard Posner right about air travel and its problems?
Next post: Rating RateMyProfessors.com













Get smart with the Thesis WordPress Theme from DIYthemes.
No reference to Claude Shannon would be complete withough a reference to his juggling machine.
http://www2.bc.edu/~lewbel/shortsha.mov
When I laugh (I did) about that video I’m intellectual? Cool..
I don’t get it.
That was great. Of course software does this all the time, though the mechanical analogue would be a machine that punches you in the face before turning itself off.
The original is so much cooler:
http://www.kugelbahn.ch/sesam_e.htm
I am secure enough to admit that I don’t get it, either.
Hilarious!
Somewhat amusing, but only after someone explained it to me.
Now Monty Python … that’s FUNNY.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0071853/quotes
Last chaos Gold
Buy Last Chaos Gold
Cheap Last Chaos Gold
Is it realistic?
thank you for this information.sis jarMy local telecom is a monopoly, and it is out-of-control as far as wiretapping, eavesdropping, hacking, controling e-mail programs, phishing, spoof websites, etc.
No company should be immune from law suits and especially companies that control our communications.To give telecoms immunity will make “big brother”free nokia 6600 games“In this paper, we compare the incidence and extent of formal coauthorship observed in economics against that observed in biology and discuss the causes and consequences of formal coauthorship in both disciplines. We then investigate the economic value (to authors) of informal comments offered by colleagues. This investigation leads us naturally into a discussion of the degree to which formal collaboration through coauthorship serves as a substitute for informal collaboration through collegial commentary. Data on manuscript submissions to the Journal of PolzticalEconomy permit us to shed additional empirical light on this subject. Finally, we demonstrate that while the incidence and extent of formal intellectual collaboration through coauthorship are greater in biology than in economics, the incidence and extent of informal intellectual collaboration are greater in economics than in biology. This leads us to search for evidence (which we find) of quids pro quo offered by authors to suppliers of free nokia n70 games
Comments on this entry are closed.