On the plane I was reading Stanislaw Lem’s famous essay on personoretics. It occurred to me that if we are living in a simulation we can make Bayesian inferences about the intentions of the designer. Let’s say many designers are creating many simulations. Will the good or the evil designers be more productive in terms of numbers of simulations created? If we define "good" as subject to some ethical constraints, I believe the good designers work under a competitive disadvantage. It’s harder to produce cheap apples, for instance, if you pledge to do so only in a "green" way. And so on. Oddly the evil designers may be under a competitive disadvantage as well. Intention has a cost and so in competitive settings it tends to fall out. In our current world most things are made by indifferent machines. I believe the rational inference about the simulation is that at least the demi-urge — and possibly the Master Creator as well — is indifferent to our plight.