Is Sarah Palin the female Ross Perot?

by on August 30, 2008 at 1:37 pm in Political Science | Permalink

Palin is being compared to Dan Quayle and Clarence Thomas but I think Ross Perot may be the more apt citation (the rest goes under the fold)... 

Palin has an outside, straight talker, pro-reform, true blooded
American, take no prisoners image much as Perot did.  (A second point of comparison is Arnold Schwarznegger, with some obvious differences.)  And she has only begun to cultivate that image.  Do
you recall how much impact Perot had on the American people? 

Of
course if Perot actually had had the chance to be President, the
results probably would not have been pretty.  He would have been forced
to act like "just another politician," as has been the case with Arnold because in fact the job revolves around knowing how to govern. 

There is one biographical fact about Palin’s life that the critics
(Drum, DeLong, Yglesias, Klein, Sullivan and Kleiman are among the ones I read)
are hardly touching upon.  I mean her decision to have a Downs child
instead of an abortion.  This is the fact about her life and it will be viewed as such from now through November and perhaps beyond. 

If only for this reason, she will be seen as a candidate who stands on principle.  I don’t think the critics are sufficiently appreciating how tired the American people are of candidates who say one thing and do another and who abandon their principles at the first provocation.  This is a deep and very strong current and it runs through virtually every group of American political voters.  Because of her decision to have a Downs child, many voters will not view Sarah Palin in a cynical light, no matter what the critics say.  No story about firing a state trooper will break that seal.

In my jaded view, "politicians who break their word, violate their ideals, and do not follow through on their promises" is not one of the major problems in American politics.  In fact it’s often good that political promises are forgotten in the light of the realities.  So the American obsession with political promise-keeping does not resonate with me.  But the American people have been hungry for a "promise keeper, ideals believer" for decades and when was the last time they actually got one?

By the way, my mom’s first reaction to the nomination (hi mom!) was
that other mothers of "different" children (what exactly is the right word here?) would very much identify
with Palin and view her life as validating theirs and thus support her.

Go away and watch a Frank Capra movie and think about Palin again.  Larry Ribstein gets it.

I do recognize and indeed emphasize that this analysis requires that she is good on TV.  I give that p = 0.63.  I’ll also give p = 0.13 that she ends up off the ticket, but most of that chance comes from her deciding she needs to spend the time with her kids.

Addendum: The best argument against the pick is this, although it does not much revise my priors.

JBJB August 31, 2008 at 11:12 pm

I think you are all missing the point. Palin is the only one of either ticket that actually understands the energy issue. Obama does not (150 billion for solar and wind, yeah that will do it). Biden, give me a break. McCain is starting to come around.

All she has to do is go out and talk about family, work/life balance (her quote about dropping the blackberry and picking up a breast pump is classic), and energy as both a domestic economic issue and a national security issue. She is so articulate on the latter that I almost cried when I first heard her discuss it.

She is the only person of the four who gets it, and she has the dirt under her fingernails to prove it. Her discussion on how government should manage the relationship between oil companies and citizens is brilliant. As well as the concept of using revenue from non renewables to fund development of viable alternatives.

The fact that our oil and gas industry in the Gulf is about to get clobbered by a hurricane will only emphasis her perspective.

crack August 31, 2008 at 11:35 pm

I’m pretty offended that people think her keeping a down syndrome child is some great moral stance. Plenty of pro-choice families have children with down syndrome. This is such a straw man argument it makes me wretch.

EJR August 31, 2008 at 11:46 pm

Suppose that Tyler is correct that Palin’s decision to keep her baby would bolster her credibility in the eyes of American voters. Suppose further that the rumor that the baby is actually the son of Palin’s daughter, Bristol, is true. Would this most likely neutralize the credibility boost, more than offset it, or result in a withdrawal of Palin as VP?

Apex September 1, 2008 at 12:00 am

Palin’s son is going to serve in Iraq. I have researched, discussed and formed many opinions about how the war was: started, prosecuted, funded, treated it’s prisoner’s, supported the returning veterans, ETC., ETC,.. And I don’t personally no any serviceman or woman stationed there. I don’t identify with her lack of curiosity.

BobN September 1, 2008 at 1:01 am

If this really boils down to Palin’s decision to carry her son to term for many people, I look forward to the discussion of how having a well-paying job with full health care (probably from BOTH parents’ jobs) makes that decision a heck of a lot easier. Not to mention life-long retirement benefits (an assumption on my part). Oh, and let’s not forget that annual state stipend from oil taxes for Alaska citizens.

It’s easier being a “fiscal conservative” when you live in a socialist state…

Mike September 1, 2008 at 2:51 am

We have some friends who are raising a Down’s syndrome daughter. I know it’s not easy, and I admire the heck out of both of them. But I would never in a million years think that either of them is qualified to be the president of the United States.

Joko September 1, 2008 at 8:57 am

Because I haven’t institutionalized my autistic son does that make me morally superior? Perhaps John McCain should have selected me as VP.

This point is a joke. Keep pushing it at your peril.

jgamble September 1, 2008 at 1:14 pm

Tyler’s blog is right on the mark!

The lefties will have a very tough time dealing with a person who is so firmly grounded in her convictions – religious and political. They couldn’t beat Reagan and they probably won’t beat Palin and McCain unless they can dislodge them from their principles. The North Vietnamese couldn’t do it with torture to John McCain and the corrupt Republican political machine in Alaska couldn’t do it to Sarah Palin. Conversely, take a look at Obama’s stands on his religion and pastor, or his friend, William Ayres, and his obfuscations during the Saddleback debates. Whether we agree or disagree with Palin and McCain, the American public have shown over and over again that they love cabdidates who stick to their principles. In any event, it will be interesting to see how the Dems will attempt to overcome this very American characteristic so easily identified in McCain and Palin.

Charles September 1, 2008 at 2:39 pm

hey, listen to Sarah Palin in her own words in this NewsWeek Video that was done back in March 2008! Its very telling!
http://www.newsweek.com/id/156190

jorod September 1, 2008 at 11:06 pm

I think DOwn’s syndrome children die young. However, some have lived to over 50. Didn’t the Kennedy’s have a Downs child? (NO, I don’t mean Ted…)

meter September 2, 2008 at 2:38 pm

Either Russell Nelson is kidding or he has a profound lack of understanding of the word “evidence.”

Anyway, thanks for the laugh.’

By the way, if you show me YOUR evidence, I’ll show you mine. (I believe that the world was pooped out by a giant pink rhinceros).

Aren’t fairy tales fun!

Aware September 3, 2008 at 4:50 pm

On Palin’s speech tonight –

Watching the right-wing Christians applaud an unmarried 17-year old and her baby daddy is worth cable at any price!

Good stuff. Go minions go! We all know that facts have a liberal bias.

fred October 23, 2008 at 11:53 am

Hi! i found a lot of films here, of course if you are using rapidshare premium account http:// megauploadfiles.com

接髮 December 10, 2008 at 2:16 am
anna May 15, 2009 at 9:13 pm

Is it realistic?

tom May 15, 2009 at 9:18 pm

Nobody knows when the politician man is talking truth, when is talking nonsence

gucci sneakers May 29, 2010 at 7:28 am

Gattaca is also one of my favourite movies,

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: