The ten most irritating phrases?

by on November 11, 2008 at 11:21 am in Data Source | Permalink

Here is one list:

The top ten most irritating phrases:

1 – At the end of the day

2 – Fairly unique

3 – I personally

4 – At this moment in time

5 – With all due respect

6 – Absolutely

7 – It’s a nightmare

8 – Shouldn’t of

9 – 24/7

10 – It’s not rocket science

I thank Yang He for the pointer.  At the end of the day, what would you add to this fairly unique list?  With all due respect, I personally, at this moment in time, absolutely shouldn’t of suggested that it’s not rocket science because 24/7 people are saying this and it is literally a nightmare.

Jim Gannon November 11, 2008 at 11:25 am

11 – literally

as you aptly demonstrated in the last sentence.

lt.milo November 11, 2008 at 11:28 am

irregardless

Kate November 11, 2008 at 11:31 am

aaacccckkk! “Shouldn’t of” is NOT a correct phrase! If correctly
spelled, it should say “shouldn’t have.”

a student of economics November 11, 2008 at 11:34 am

Like, literally every article I, like, read misuses the word “literally”.

DavidAK November 11, 2008 at 11:37 am

whatnot

tojo November 11, 2008 at 11:38 am

110% is also really annoying. “I give 110% 24/7!”

The Drunken Priest November 11, 2008 at 11:41 am

“Needless to say”

If it’s needless to say then there’s no reason to say it.

angus November 11, 2008 at 11:41 am

“I’m from the government and I’m here to help you”

gumbo November 11, 2008 at 11:45 am

“Think outside the box” does it for me.

And “synergy”. Whenever someone uses the word synergy, there’s at least a 90% chance everything they’re saying is nonsense.

Andrew November 11, 2008 at 11:47 am

I would add “To be honest with you,” except that if people stop saying it, I wouldn’t know if their subsequent statements were lies.

MTheads November 11, 2008 at 11:49 am

How about “top ten list?” Or is that more of a warning than a phrase?

Matt C. November 11, 2008 at 11:50 am

Sammy-
If you things are going down as badly as you say. The only thing we have left is humor. After that, you are just left bored and depressed.

SkitzoLeezra November 11, 2008 at 11:52 am

“In my opinion”.
OF COURSE it is YOUR opinion, douchebag!

Walter Underwood November 11, 2008 at 11:55 am

“perfect storm”, especially when used to mean “unfortunate coincidence”.

Anonymous November 11, 2008 at 12:01 pm

“moving forward” – what, we’re going to move backwards?

Rupert November 11, 2008 at 12:06 pm

Going forward. It never, ever means anything – it’s always used in a context where you can’t go backwards.

derek November 11, 2008 at 12:09 pm

I’m less concerned about overuse than I am misuse or simply poor phrasing.

For example, it is fine to say “literally”, but hopefully you are using it to mean that something is truly happening (as opposed to you exaggerating or speaking figuaratively) rather than using it as a synonym for “very”.

“Irregardless” isn’t a word.

“I personally” is stupidly redundant.

“At this moment in time” is very clumsy and awkward; I am thankfully not sure that people actually say this.

Scott November 11, 2008 at 12:13 pm

“The proof is straightforward.”

Thomas November 11, 2008 at 12:15 pm

Actually, Kate (at 11:31), I personally think that’s basically the point (shouldn’t of rather than should not have…). Come on, and with all due respect this ain’t rocket science.

Kiwini November 11, 2008 at 12:15 pm

“As such”

Don the libertarian Democrat November 11, 2008 at 12:17 pm

Thanks for the list. I’ll use them all.Absolutely. It’s a no brainer. Cheers. Oh, is that irritating? Let me know. You’re saving me a bundle on market research.

robby November 11, 2008 at 12:19 pm

“My friends, my maverick running mate and I are going to shake up Warshington and grow the economy!”

Kent Guida November 11, 2008 at 12:28 pm

Sustainable, sustainability, sustainable development.
These are used as codewords for redistribution, shakedown by third-world tyrants, or socialism. Or else they are used as synonyms for The Good, without all that messy business of enquiring into what the good is.
When I hear the word, I’m sure what follows will be either grossly inflated blather, or a complete con.

Christopher B. November 11, 2008 at 12:35 pm

“Going Green”

Walter November 11, 2008 at 12:39 pm

1. “Going forward…”
2. “In all honesty…”
3. “Frankly speaking…”

Rich Berger November 11, 2008 at 12:44 pm

Hope and change.

Anonymous November 11, 2008 at 12:54 pm

“pink is the new black”, “geeky is the new cool” etc.

Ned Baker November 11, 2008 at 12:57 pm

I second “any construction involving Wall Street / Main Street.”

Here are a few of mine:

  • having said that
  • “space” as used in “We are very competitive in that space.”
  • “resource” when referring to an employee
  • per annum
  • akin
  • vis-a-vis (used instead of “with respect to” to sound more pretentious
  • special interests (we’re all opposed to them by definition, right?)
  • liberal (what does this word mean anymore?)

wongba November 11, 2008 at 1:01 pm

“And where did the one below come from, and how does something so revolting become popular among otherwise respectable people?”

dodgeball the movie

Constant November 11, 2008 at 1:08 pm

I don’t think I’m familiar with the misuse of 24/7. It is an compact description of a business or service that is always available. There is one convenience store in my area that is open 24/7.

Gwen November 11, 2008 at 1:12 pm

also:
when people misuse the word cynical to mean ‘negative’.
Ex: ‘Sorry to be so cynical, but I don’t think xyz will win’

Silas Barta (formerly Person) November 11, 2008 at 1:14 pm

English_Professor: I actually made a whole vlog on this topic, most of which criticizes constructions involving the metaphorical “table”. Go to my YT page and click on “First vlog: idiots on the internet”.

I also hate “cents on the dollar” (we have the % symbol, folks).

@Kent_Guida: agreed. As best I can determine, those mean, “it doesn’t preserve something I want to preserve”.

How come no one’s said anything about people who put underscores in spaces?

Yancey Ward November 11, 2008 at 1:22 pm

Yes, we can.

thecheuksmainman November 11, 2008 at 1:31 pm

-ed to perfection”
“no question about it”
“monetarily” v. financially or economically
-wise” as in “having to do with

thecheuksmainman November 11, 2008 at 1:34 pm

escaped my bracket characters..

“VERB-ed to perfection”
“NOUN-wise” as in “having to do with NOUN

Andrew November 11, 2008 at 1:36 pm

I want to stand up for 24/7 — so long as it’s used literally. To say that something is open 24/7 is the fastest way to convey the point that it never closes. To say “I’m thinking about you 24/7″ is idiotic.

Ashish November 11, 2008 at 1:47 pm

It seems to me that everybody has forgotten to mention the phrase “it seems to me…”.

name withheld by flying saucer November 11, 2008 at 1:50 pm

that oft-recurring phrase “limpsquidgenous bilge-wash” is really starting to rankle my hackles

John Thacker November 11, 2008 at 1:56 pm

No one’s mentioned the Internet meme annoying phrases, although I see that James Lileks has discussed those today. Your basic “FAIL,” “made of fail,” “I loves me some X,” “X, not so much,” etc.

Carrie November 11, 2008 at 2:07 pm

The phrase “I might could” drives me insane, “you know?”

MW November 11, 2008 at 2:13 pm

Introducing a TV news story with, “In these hard economic times, …”

As opposed to when, the malaise of the 70s, the Depression, frontier days? For most viewing the story, these are the best times ever.

Daniel Klein November 11, 2008 at 2:19 pm

positive/normative

rational

equilibrium [without reference to a model]

objective/subjective

MTheads November 11, 2008 at 2:21 pm

“Sucks” sucks. Though I admit to using it.

Let them eat Thomas Paine November 11, 2008 at 2:23 pm

Any vague, empty rhetoric (e.g. “Yes we can”)

Anonymous November 11, 2008 at 2:36 pm

“comes at a time when”

54,100 hits for this phrase when googling – “comes at a time when” “new york times”

Daniel Klein November 11, 2008 at 2:38 pm

Deirdre McCloskey ECONOMICAL WRITING 2000 pp. 76-77:

In Ersatz Economics, prices start by “skyrocketing.” When “sellers outnumber buyers” prices fall from “exorbitant” or “gouging” levels, down through “fair” and “just.” If this “vicious cycle” goes on too long, though, they fall to “unfair” and “cutthroat,” the result of “dumping.” Likewise, the woman in the street believes she knows that unions and corporations have more “bargaining power” than do their victims, and therefore can “exploit” them. A consumer can “afford” medical care, maybe only “barely afford” it, “needs” housing, and views food as a “basic necessity.” Business people maintain their “profit margins,” probably “obscene” or “unwarranted,” by “passing along” a higher wage, which causes workers to demand still higher wages, in a “spiral.” The protection of the American worker’s “living wage” from “unfair competition” by “cheap foreign labor” should be high on the nation’s list of “priorities,” as should be the “rebuilding” of our “collapsing” industrial “base.”

Gomer November 11, 2008 at 2:44 pm

If you want to know the truth ….
Perfect strom ….
ping me ….

thatguy November 11, 2008 at 2:53 pm

The use of the word “myself” as used by pro athletes….. shiver

rkillings November 11, 2008 at 3:01 pm

‘shouldn’t of’ may be *dismaying* but should not be irritating. If you are irritated by others’ ignorance, it’s your own fault.

For ye have the poor spellers always with you …

Dan November 11, 2008 at 3:11 pm

‘Reach Out’ ~ As in “I’ll reach out to operations on that topic.”

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: