Reducing foreclosures

by on April 11, 2009 at 12:48 pm in Economics | Permalink

Here is an excellent blog post and Fed study.  There is too much content for my summary to dominate clicking on the link but the bottom line is this:

This analysis suggests mortgage modifications – without principal reduction – will have limited success.

It is one of the best economics blog posts this week.

franko April 11, 2009 at 1:00 pm

none of that is helpful for obama to have a second term as potus

:-(

BoscoH April 11, 2009 at 2:29 pm

I thought this sentence the blogger quoted most interesting:

If the initial DTI is also the threshold for ex post DTI, then, with income risk, about 70 percent of the loans will become unaffordable even without the reset.

The long term assumption used to be that personal income growth during a career and a manageable inflation would result in the payments being less and less of an issue as the term of the mortgage moved on. And you’d buy a life insurance policy so your wife and kids could stay in the home if you died unexpectedly. Prices lately have trended toward the maximum payments that buyers could afford. They have a very long way to back down to get back to how things used to be. They have a long way to back down to get to something more sustainable. That means a lot of lost equity, and it means buyers becoming more sensible and risk averse and thinking about what if in the long term. But I suspect it means an extended cycle of fairly high prices, high default rates, and unpredictable default — banks seem to be more loss averse than risk averse.

Andrew April 11, 2009 at 3:47 pm

Which parable was it about the debtor who was forgiven and then went out and did a shakedown on someone a small amount owed them?

Maybe we tell the big four that the three with the lowest default rates by a certain date get favorable stress tests.

Dan Weber April 12, 2009 at 2:55 am

This runs against the experience of Clayton Homes that Buffett put in his latest shareholder letter (PDF)

Clayton’s 198,888 borrowers, however, have continued to pay normally throughout the housing crash, handing us no unexpected losses. This is not because these borrowers are unusually creditworthy, a point proved by FICO scores (a standard measure of credit risk). Their median FICO score is 644, compared to a national
median of 723, and about 35% are below 620, the segment usually designated “sub-prime.† Many disastrous pools of mortgages on conventional homes are populated by borrowers with far better credit, as measured by FICO scores.

Why are our borrowers – characteristically people with modest incomes and far-from-great credit scores – performing so well? The answer is elementary, going right back to Lending 101. Our borrowers simply looked at how full-bore mortgage payments would compare with their actual – not hoped-for – income and then decided whether they could live with that commitment. Simply put, they took out a mortgage with the intention of paying it off, whatever the course of home prices.

Commentary about the current housing crisis often ignores the crucial fact that most foreclosures do not occur because a house is worth less than its mortgage (so-called “upside-down† loans). Rather, foreclosures take place because borrowers can’t pay the monthly payment that they agreed to pay. Homeowners who have made a meaningful down-payment – derived from savings and not from other borrowing – seldom walk away from a primary residence simply because its value today is less than the mortgage. Instead, they walk when they can’t make the monthly payments.

Now, Buffett obviously is not a neutral party here, being an investor in Clayton Homes. But I don’t think he’s out-and-out lying.

I’m looking at the Fed paper and I can’t see mortgage problems broken out by various levels of DTI, only one aggregate statistical correlation. Histograms would be very nice here.

David April 12, 2009 at 9:58 am

People go “underwater” on their cars as soon as they drive them off the lot. They usually pay the loans though. Being underwater PLUS bank unwillingness to take a short sale increases risk of foreclosure.

uu April 13, 2009 at 4:29 am

discount tiffany’s jewellery
Tiffany Bracelets
Tiffany Necklaces
Tiffany Rings
Tiffany Earrings
Tiffany Cufflinks
tiffany jewellery
tiffany and co
tiffany co

DavidS April 13, 2009 at 12:42 pm

It isn’t just that homeowners getting underwater is the problem, it is also that the financial institutions that are so highly leveraged that all it takes is a few foreclosures and the financial institutions become “underwater”, too.

When you are levered 20 to 1, 30 to 1, or 40 to 1, how much downside can you handle before the financial institution gets into trouble?

All the comments about homeowner behavior seems to apply to corporate behavior.

The only way to get rid of debt is to pay it down or default. Everything else is smoke and mirrors.

holmegm April 14, 2009 at 2:03 pm

So, does everybody keep trying to convince themselves of this – the uselessness of mortgage modification – because they still think there’s some risk that TARP money will be used for, well, TARP? Relief of troubled mortgage assets?

I’m current on my mortgage (by amazing feats of mathematical and working gymnastics), but man is the payment it a huge slice of my income.

I’m underwater and all it would take is one good crisis … so the idea that giving me more breathing room is *useless*, because I’ll still default anyway, seems kind of counterintuitive.

A rate modification would greatly improve the stability of [i]this[/i] little slice of the economy over at my house.

tiffany jewellry June 19, 2009 at 2:00 am

I apppraciate your comment ,your idea is wonderful.
wish you everything goes smoothly !

anonymous June 25, 2009 at 11:16 pm

no need to discuss!(no need for discussion.).links of londonWhat nerve! How dare you talk back to your mother! What nerve.links of londonYou can tell. You gained weight didn’t you? You can tell.You be the judge.Tiffany JewelleryI’m not that hungry.Can you spot me?Wouldn’t I know!I’m telling the truth. I’m not lying.What do you mean by that!Take a closer look.You have to be on time. Don’t be late.What kind of hero is that!

dresser October 31, 2009 at 5:47 pm

i support your idea.hope you everying goes well.

cupboard November 7, 2009 at 12:01 pm

I’m not lying.What do you mean by that!Take a closer look.You have to be on time. Don’t be late.What kind of hero is that!

cupboard cabinet November 8, 2009 at 3:13 am

cupboard cabinet

cupboard desk November 8, 2009 at 9:12 am

desk

cupboard chest November 8, 2009 at 10:03 am

I’m not lying.What do you mean by that!Take a closer look.You have to be on time. Don’t be late.What kind of hero is that!

bedroom furniture November 9, 2009 at 5:59 am

bedroom furniture

Mortgage advice December 4, 2009 at 5:49 am

I found your blog in the search engines while I was researching for something about Reducing foreclosures, I like what you have written, your style is easy to read and follow. Have bookmarked your blog for future reffernce, Hoping to read more in the future.

bob su January 29, 2010 at 5:55 pm

useful information here. Thanks get my ex back

lynn August 3, 2010 at 10:16 pm

I mean I just read through theNFL Jerseys
entire article of yours and it was quite good but since I’m more of a visual learner,I found that to be more helpful well let me know how it turns out!

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: