Might one reason be recurring famine?:
Despite its name, Cape Verde is an arid landmass with minimal agricultural potential. The excess mortality associated with its major famines in unparalleled in relative terms. A famine in 1773-76 is said to have removed 44 percent of the population; a second in 1830-33 is claimed to have killed 42 percent of the population of seventy thousand or so; and a third in 1854-56 to have killed 25 percent. In 1860 the population was ninety thousand; 40 percent of Cape Verdeans were reported to have died of famine in 1863-67. Despite a population loss of thirty thousand, the population was put at eighty thousand in 1870. Twentieth-century famines in Cape Verde were less deadly, but still extreme relative to most contemporaneous ones elsewhere: 15 percent of the population (or twenty thousand) in 1900-1903; 16 percent (twenty-five thousand) in 1920-22; 15 percent (twenty thousand) in 1940-43; and 18 percent (thirty thousand) in 1946-48…
…such death tolls imply extraordinary noncrisis population growth. For instance, if the population estimates for 1830 and 1860 are credited, making good the damage inflicted by the famine of 1830-33 would have required an annual population growth rate of about 4 percent between 1833 and 1860 — despite the loss of a quarter or so of the population in 1854-56.
That is all from the new and noteworthy Famine: A Short History, by Cormac O Grada. Here is the book's home page.
Here are the author's working papers on famine.















Hmmm, can’t they fish? What am I missing here?
The numbers are believable if the driver of population growth during the not-so-bad times is the return of emigrants who left during the bad times.
Does the music from the Sahel, another famine belt, sound so sad?
Hi. The right title should be: Why does SOME music from Cape Verde sound so sad?
There is a branch of capeverdean music that talks about “Sodadi”, been far away, on someone else’s country and missing the family, loved ones…
The numbers are believable if the driver of population growth during the not-so-bad times is the return of emigrants who left during the bad times.
I agree with being skeptical as famines could also be a reason to sing cheerful songs in an attempt of self-delusion.
en i think so too
Comments on this entry are closed.