Small steps toward a much better world, a continuing series

by on May 21, 2009 at 9:11 am in Sports | Permalink

Remember that guy Hayek?  Or is it Walras?

The San Francisco Giants are experimenting with a possible solution – software that weighs ticket sales data, weather forecasts, upcoming pitching matchups and other variables to help decide whether the team should raise or lower prices right up until game day.

The story is here and I thank the excellent Michael Makowsky for the pointer.

Diversity May 21, 2009 at 9:49 am

Sounds good. But for the next two years better put Northern California job losses into the equation.

A Non Ymus May 21, 2009 at 10:05 am

Why not just set up an auction site?

Current May 21, 2009 at 11:26 am

To get the mention read the paper “The Uses of Knowledge” by Hayek.

In a contract for electrical transformers a relative of mine once dealt with there was a clause that could be described as “Hayekian”.

There is a list of wholesale prices for steel, oil and copper. These are the materials that make up grid electrical transformers.

The contract stated a price with a caveat. If the price of steel, oil and copper moved outside of a particular range mentioned in the contract then the transformer vendor had the right to increase the price correspondingly.

Hence a “fixed contract” was made capable of variability.

This clause was actually employed about two years ago.

Ed May 21, 2009 at 12:40 pm

“Moneyball” was about a general manager who understood statistics. Maybe we will see a similar book someday about a team president who understands economics.

Jonathan Falk May 21, 2009 at 1:18 pm

I hope they’re consulting Philip Leslie at Stanford who has been looking at these issues for some time, see, http://www.stanford.edu/~pleslie/resale.pdf amd Rand Journal, 2004, pp. 520-41.

secretivek May 21, 2009 at 4:04 pm

Why not just allow scalpers?

chrismealy May 21, 2009 at 4:56 pm

Walras is the guy who imported equilibrium style models from physics into economics. A Walrasian auction is the idealized perfect economic exchange (no transaction costs, perfect information, instantaneous) that economists can’t live without, but that doesn’t exist in reality. Economists love it when reality occasionally conforms to their models.

Kevin May 21, 2009 at 7:57 pm

I’m pretty sure they use Qcue, who won the moot corp competition at UT-Austin a few years ago.

Don K May 22, 2009 at 12:32 am

IIRC, the Phillies in the 60′s did something similar by not designating seats in perpetuity as reserved vs general admission. When the Dodgers or Giants were in town, a large part of the upper deck would be reserved, while for a game with the Cubs the entire upper deck would be Gen Ad. Suffice to say my Dad and I went to games against the Cubs and had seats in the front row of the upper deck for a Gen Ad price.

raivo pommer-eesti May 23, 2009 at 7:04 am

Gordon Brown’s authority is openly challenged today, as a senior minister tells him to leave Hazel Blears in her Cabinet post.

Caroline Flint, the Minister for Europe, says in The Times that Ms Blears, a fellow Blairite, should stay in her job amid growing fears among her friends that she may be the top-level sacrifice for the expenses fiasco.

Ms Flint risks angering Downing Street by saying that Ms Blears had technically done nothing wrong, despite Mr Brown’s branding her behaviour “completely unacceptable† after she failed to pay capital gains tax on the sale of a flat.

Friends of Ms Blears are annoyed that Mr Brown appears to have been far tougher on her than other ministers. He swiftly cleared Geoff Hoon and James Purnell of wrongdoing over allegations that they had not paid capital gains tax on their London homes.

Ms Flint also sides with Ms Blears, the Communities Secretary, in her recent criticism of the Government’s communication effort — seen widely at the time as an attack on Mr Brown.

Ms Flint says that Ms Blears is “one of the last people who would ever come into politics to gain some kind of financial benefit†.

Ministers rarely risk trespassing on the Prime Minister’s autonomy over reshuffles, particularly so close to the event. The show of ministerial indisciple is a further sign of how far the expenses controversy is altering the normal rules of political behaviour.

In a further sign of the febrile atmosphere at the top of government, some ministers are now speculating that Mr Brown could be persuaded to call an autumn election. They say that, with Labour apparently heading for certain defeat next year, the only way Mr Brown could rescue his party would be to be bold and go to the country on his plans to take Britain out of the recession and clean up politics.

One minister said that David Cameron’s hopes of a smooth ride towards the election had also been upset by the expenses revelations, which have reminded voters of an old-style Tory party “moats and all†.

“Of course it’s hitting us badly, but all the signs are that UKIP will hit them just as much as they hit us in the European elections,† the minister said.

Ms Flint, who is in charge of Labour’s campaign for the European elections, said that the party was “going to take a hit† at the June 4 polls. A government reshuffle is expected widely soon after.

The Times has been told by informed sources that Lord Mandelson will not be moved to the Foreign Office, and that David Miliband, the Foreign Secretary, has been assured that this is the case.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: