Here is more.
Cumulous Brand
Previous post: Assorted links
Next post: What does the public plan equilibrium look like?, part III
Our Books
Modern Principles of Economics
Launching The Innovation Renaissance
The Great Stagnation: How America Ate All the Low-Hanging Fruit of Modern History, Got Sick, and Will(Eventually) Feel Better
Create Your Own Economy: The Path to Prosperity in a Disordered World
Discover Your Inner Economist
Good and Plenty: The Creative Successes of American Arts Funding
Judge and Jury: American Tort Law on Trial
Markets and Cultural Voices: Liberty vs. Power in the Lives of Mexican Amate Painters (Economics, Cognition, and Society)
The Voluntary City: Choice, Community, and Civil Society (Economics, Cognition, and Society)
Creative Destruction: How Globalization Is Changing the World's Cultures
Changing the Guard: Private Prisons and the Control of Crime
What Price Fame?
In Praise of Commercial Culture
Entrepreneurial Economics: Bright Ideas from the Dismal Science
Contact Us
It maybe brilliant art, but logoing his scrotum is toe over the foul line. I think the bill of rights needs expanding to include :”the right to grow up without you parents using yuor scrotum for artisitc expression. Although i’m curiuos is that pampers, or durex maybe…Jokeys!!! Or maybe the family crest, branding the future output with a seal of genetic quality.
OK, I’ve subbed in a different photo. I hadn’t even noticed the part you mentioned!
“His work shows us how a mushroom cloud can resemble a tree house, an anus a vortex, a suicide bomber a vulnerable human being, all in an effort to explore our varied states of contentment and security.”
Why is a baby scrotum “questionable” John? Are you turned on by it?
Is this deep or sublime?
I suppose I’m the only person who thinks this is child abuse.
Why is a baby scrotum “questionable” John? Are you turned on by it?
i don’t think it’s abuse, but it is certainly exploitation.
It looks like child abuse. But if the paint is non-toxic, and the children intelligent, then how so?
If all the NoLogo people understood brands, they’d realize that it is parents with babies who are suckers for brands, not babies. If there was such a thing as “No Leaky” Diapers(TM) I’d buy them by the bushel.
I don’t agree that it’s definitely not PS. I immediately assumed they were photoshopped.
I don’t agree that it’s definitely not PS. I immediately assumed they were photoshopped.
Comments on this entry are closed.