Department of Unintended Consequences, installment #539

by on August 5, 2009 at 12:54 pm in Political Science | Permalink

We show that these types of international action on child labor tend to
lower domestic political support within developing countries for
banning child labor.

Here is much more.

bedmondson August 5, 2009 at 1:46 pm

Dear god! Blog posts linking me to information that I must shell out money to read? What is this world coming to. Oh well, ignorance is bliss.

Habermas August 5, 2009 at 2:22 pm

“Nice article. I’d think any international action that portends a lower GDP for a developing country while claiming to improve living conditions would not easily succeed.”

I’m glad you at least recognize that it will not fail ipso facto.

John B. Chilton August 5, 2009 at 3:23 pm
Andrew August 5, 2009 at 11:50 pm

You should have mentioned that this is a theory paper. I wouldn’t have wasted my time…

Doc Merlin August 6, 2009 at 12:51 pm

From history, generally, child labor being banned in first world countries was more due to union practices and tried to eliminate competition in the labor market rather than any concern for the child. So, in that way its a lot like immigration restrictions.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: