Elinor Ostrom may arguable be considered the mother of field work in development economics. She has worked closely investigating water associations in Los Angeles, police departments in Indiana, and irrigation systems in Nepal. In each of these cases her work has explored how between the atomized individual and the heavy-hand of government there is a range of voluntary, collective associations that over time can evolve efficient and equitable rules for the use of common resources.
With her husband, political scientist Vincent Ostrom, she established the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis in 1973 at Indiana University, an extraordinarily productive and evolving association of students and professors which has produced a wealth of theory, empirical studies and experiments in political science and especially collective action. The Ostrom's work bridges political science and economics. Both are well known at GMU since both have been past presidents of the Public Choice society and both have been influenced by the Buchanan-Tullock program. You can also see elements of Hayekian thought about the importance of local knowledge in the work of both Ostroms (here is a good interview). My colleague, Peter Boettke has just published a book on the Ostrom's and the Bloomington School.
Elinor Ostrom's work culminated in Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action which uses case studies to argue that around the world private associations have often, but not always, managed to avoid the tragedy of the commons and develop efficient uses of resources. (Ostrom summarizes some of her findings from this research here). Using game theory she provided theoretical underpinnings for these findings and using experimental methods she put these theories to the test in the lab.
For Ostrom it's not the tragedy of the commons but the opportunity of the commons. Not only can a commons be well-governed but the rules which help to provide efficiency in resource use are also those that foster community and engagement. A formally government protected forest, for example, will fail to protect if the local users do not regard the rules as legitimate. In Hayekian terms legislation is not the same as law. Ostrom's work is about understanding how the laws of common resource governance evolve and how we may better conserve resources by making legislation that does not conflict with law.
← Previous Comments
Nicely presented information in this post, I prefer to read this kind of stuff. The quality of content is fine and the conclusion is good. Thanks for the post.
She has an excellent history. I would say thanks to you for sharing all that great stuff.
We must proud of such woman. Thanks for article.
Thank you for such a fantastic blog. Where else could anyone get that kind of info written in such a perfect way? I have a presentation that I am presently working on, and I have been on the look out for such information.
I revelled reading it. I require to read more on this topic…I am admiring the time and effort you put in your blog, because it is obviously one great place where I can find lot of functional info..Thank you,
Hi This one is great and is really a good post . I think it will help me a lot in the related stuff and is very much useful for me.Very well written I appreciate & must say good job..
took me time to read all the comments, but I really enjoyed the article. It proved to be Very helpful to me and I am sure to all the commentators here! It’s always nice when you can not only be informed, but also entertained .
I am working on a thesis, my findings are about strategy in territorial economy and the Institutions are self governed by local communauty named Fokonolona.
I am working on a thesis, my findings are about strategy in territorial economy and the Institutions are self governed by local communauty named Fokonolona.
Elinor Ostrom efforts are tremendous, even i appreciate her husband Vincet who supported her through out development stage.
I think you have made some very interesting points here. Not too many people would actually think about this the way you just did. I am really impressed that there is so much about this topic thats been uncovered and you did it so well, with so much class. Thanks for taking the precious time to discuss this topic with us.
Good work†¦unique site and interesting too†¦ keep it up†¦looking forward for more updates.
First of all let me tell you, you have got a great blog .I am interested in looking for more of such topics and would like to have further information. Hope to see the next blog soon.
The blog was absolutely fantastic! Lot of great information which can be helpful in some or the other way. Keep updating the blog,looking forward for more contents…Great job, keep it up..
Thank you ,i like that?
I think that Simon really is the most fascinating poly scientist that I have read in awhile.
NY Criminal Lawyers
Hi This one is great and is really a good post . I think it will help me a lot in the related stuff and is very much useful for me.Very well written I appreciate & must say good job..
I enjoyed every little bit part of it and I will be waiting for the new updates. You are a brilliant writer. This is a good post the blog was absolutely fantastic! Lot of great information which can be helpful in some or the other way. Looking forward for more updates..
that’s just brilliant! there is nothing less difficult and I believe that is the key to its success. I really adore what you had to say. Keep going because you definitely bring a new voice to this subject. It has information I have been searching for a long time.
The improvement in the unemployment rate, however, appears to be due to engineers who have taken jobs in other fields or given up their job searches, IEEE-USA how to lose belly fat
Interestingly, both Williamson and Ostrom won their prizes in part based on work in areas (the firm, property rights …) probed by Coase in the articles based on which he received the Prize.
that’s just brilliant! there is nothing less difficult and I believe that is the key to its success. I really adore what you had to say. Keep going because you definitely bring a new voice to this subject. It has information I have been searching for a long time.
Thank you for the sensible critique. Me and my neighbor were just preparing to do some research about this. We got a grab a book from our local library but I think I learned more from this post. I am very glad to see such great information being shared freely out there.
Not only can a commons be well-governed but the rules which help to provide efficiency in resource use are also those that foster community and engagement. A formally government protected forest, for example, will fail to protect if the local users do not regard the rules as legitimate. In Hayekian terms legislation is not the same as law.
This can be the best to get on the stuff that will be much better to focus. Worth knowing this.
← Previous Comments
Comments on this entry are closed.