Chinese artist Liu Bolin does not use photoshop, just paint. It helps to know that the government shut down his art studio in 2005. More here
Invisible Man
Previous post: Department of Unintended Consequences
Next post: Assorted links
Our Books
Modern Principles of Economics
Launching The Innovation Renaissance
The Great Stagnation: How America Ate All the Low-Hanging Fruit of Modern History, Got Sick, and Will(Eventually) Feel Better
Create Your Own Economy: The Path to Prosperity in a Disordered World
Discover Your Inner Economist
Good and Plenty: The Creative Successes of American Arts Funding
Judge and Jury: American Tort Law on Trial
Markets and Cultural Voices: Liberty vs. Power in the Lives of Mexican Amate Painters (Economics, Cognition, and Society)
The Voluntary City: Choice, Community, and Civil Society (Economics, Cognition, and Society)
Creative Destruction: How Globalization Is Changing the World's Cultures
Changing the Guard: Private Prisons and the Control of Crime
What Price Fame?
In Praise of Commercial Culture
Entrepreneurial Economics: Bright Ideas from the Dismal Science
Contact Us
Quite fantastic. This reminds me of the 3-D pavement graffiti, only this time the artist is the subject.
Those pictures are amazing!
Yes, but only because they were done with paint rather than Photoshop. Which is pretty odd when you think about it–the value of the art, then, is not the images that result (the end product that we actually see), but in the back-story, in that they were produced using a difficult, painstaking (but wholly unnecessary) process.
It’s a signal of purity of intention. It makes for very effective protest, much like a hunger strike.
Paint to Photoshop is as Art to Hackery
@Slocum, @gary
He paints his body. Then he poses for photographs. That is what makes it so cool. You could be walking by and he would look almost invisible. It’s something you couldn’t recreate with Photoshop. So, it’s the end product we value here, not the medium of creation. We’re just viewing it in a form that could easily be counterfeited.
He paints his body. Then he poses for photographs. [...] We’re just viewing it in a form that could easily be counterfeited.
That’s a nice trick, but it still only works on camera. The part of the uniform he painted on himself for example only works from this exact angle.
But what’s the problem that the production method counts? We could easily manipulate images to make the 100m sprint seem faster on screen, or to have your favourite team win every game. Or film mars landings in a studio.
Comments on this entry are closed.