Results for “foot-binding” 2 found
The Economic Motives for Foot-Binding
From Lingwei Wu and Xinyu Fan at AEA:
What are the origins of gender-biased social norms? As a painful custom that persisted in historical China, foot-binding targeted girls whose feet were reshaped during early childhood. This paper presents a unified theory to explain the stylized facts of foot-binding, and investigates its historical dynamics driven by a gender-asymmetric mobility system in historical China (the Civil Examination System). The exam system marked the transition from hereditary aristocracy to meritocracy, generated a more heterogeneous composition of men compared to that of women, and triggered intensive competition among women in the marriage market. As a competition package carrying both aesthetic and moral values, foot-binding was gradually adopted by women as their social ladder, first in the upper class and later by the lower class. Since foot-binding impedes non-sedentary labor, but not sedentary labor, however, its adoption in the lower class exhibited distinctive regional variation: it was highly prevalent in regions where women specialized in household handicraft, and was less popular in regions where women specialized in intensive farming, e.g. rice cultivation. Empirically, we conduct analysis using county-level Republican archives on foot-binding to test the cross-sectional predictions of our theory, and major findings that are robust and consistent with key theoretical predictions.
There are other interesting papers at the link, relating to culture and women’s issues.
Sunday assorted links
1. “If I wanted to, I could be offended all the time. But I’m not.”
3. A rent-seeking theory of foot-binding.
4. Are consultants the new competition for think tanks?
5. Ana Marie Cox interview with Ben Sasse (NYT).
6. Thwarted markets in everything: Charles Dickens stopped PT Barnum from buying Shakespeare’s house and shipping it to the U.S.