Steve Randy Waldman on the new Fed plan

Here (hat tip to Mark Thoma):

I am caught between a million things.  But when I woke up the the Federal Reserve’s press release about the TAF, my jaw dropped.  It was one of those moments when the world shook, everything was the same, but everything had changed…this plan is brilliant.

I’m a bit more blase than that, but I did think it worth a blog post.  The core innovation is that the Fed announces a quantity of funds to be auctioned, and the market sets the price.  That is in contrast to the Fed targeting the Federal Funds rate; price-quantity equivalence results do not hold when credit rationing is present.  It’s like forcing a certain amount of discount window borrowing.  This means that new funds will get to banks, and to banks with credit problems, it will be interesting to see at what price.

The skeptical Jim Lowe, over at Mark Thoma’s, says:

The primary problem facing credit markets is not lack of liquidity but rather a combination of capital inadequacy and fears of credit/counterparty risk. I don’t see how another liquidity injection addresses these problems.

In response, the Fed seems to be promising to "hold the bag" on the collateral offered by the soon-to-be borrowing banks.  Could this be a collateral pledge disguised as a liquidity injection?  Or is the main goal simply to reroute liquidity injections away from the main banks and toward the troubled cases?

Here is Greg Ip as well.

Addendum: Comment #1 gives what is apparently the Fed’s schedule for evaluating collateral, mortgages appear to receive very favorable treatment.

Comments

His name is "Steve Waldman" (with one n) rather than "Randy Waldmann".

Grep Ip also has a FAQ at Everything You Want to Know About Today’s Fed Move But Didn’t Know Who to Ask.

If this new TAF unfreezes bank lending, then presumably the Libor spread will diminish. This matters since things like student loans and especially ARM mortgages are often tied to Libor rather than the Fed funds target rate. Cuts in the Fed rate have been ineffective because Libor remained stubbornly high. It's not clear that this will be truly effective in forestalling the wave of foreclosures from ARM resets over the next year (goodbye subprime mortgage crisis, hello even-scarier prime mortgage crisis), but it can't hurt.

The Fed will be taking junk as collateral on very generous terms. A huge bailout.

I found the above comment by Joe to be interesting, and would like to understand it a little better for a project i'm working on. Joe, if you're checking back on the comments, would you be so kind as to email me? the email address attached to your post does not function

Tyler, regarding the supposed favorable treatment provided mortgages in that schedule, it all depends on the quality of the Fed's collateral valuations. The haircuts on mortgages in that schedule are applied to market value, not outstanding principal balance. If the Fed gets the market value right -- not an easy thing, admittedly -- the haircuts aren't obviously favorable.

I have put to Martin Wolf at FT for comment the view that the effect and probably the function of the process being established is to re-start the pricing of assets (auction method) in much the same way as done by the RTC during the Savings & Loan debacle.

This will be a "synthetic market" in that the buyers have no true "demand" for the assets to be purchased (collateral); nor do they have a "need" to deploy idle capital. But, it can initiate the pricing mechanisms.

Full credit here goes to Brad Hintz. This is just a few paragraphs from a piece he put out the day before the TAF was announced.

The reason that funding tightens at calendar year-end is that as December 31 approaches, commercial banks begin to reduce their discretionary lending activities in order to "window dress" their balance sheets for year end. And as this large funding source disappears, the cost of funding over that short period near December 31 rises rapidly. For the fixed income divisions of the institutional brokerage firms, because their year end is November 301, this presents an earnings opportunity. The US brokerage firms increase their balance sheets and purchase assets that have been shed as part of this year-end window dressing by the commercial banks and provide funding at highly attractive rates2 through financing trades.

This bit of Wall Street trivia is important because the 2007 year end is going be much, MUCH more 'exciting' than normal because major commercial banks around the world, which have suffered losses in Q3 2007, are now in challenging capital positions. To shore up their Tier 1 capital ratios and to appear both liquid and financially strong when they print their 2007 year-end balance sheets, the only available solution is to reduce discretionary loans and shed assets prior to year end.

However, for brokerage firms, the funding and liquidity challenges of August have not been forgotten. Commercial paper issuers have reduced the tenure of their maturities and a significant portion of the brokers' balance sheets have become less liquid as conditions have worsened in the structured product and MBS marketplace. As such, it appears that the Street is attempting to remain very liquid at year end in the face of much more attentive rating agencies and very concerned counterparties. Morgan Stanley has publicly stated that it "is husbanding" liquidity. So this year, the major capital markets brokers appear to be passing on the opportunity to peak their balance sheet.

Free weight loss resources is to help you make healthy food and lifestyle choices for you and your family. You'll find topics that will help improve your overall health and sense of well-being related to weight loss, relationships, diet, exercises, nutrition, vitamins, prevention, and more. The first goal of dieting is to stop further weight gain. The next goal is to establish realistic weight loss goals. While the ideal weight is a BMI of 20-25, this is difficult to achieve for many people. Thus success is higher when a goal is set to lose 10% to 15% of baseline weight as opposed to 20% to 30% or higher. It is also important to remember that any weight reduction in an obese person would result in health benefits.

Hoodia is currently the most publicized and talked about natural weight loss product in America . It has been featured on CBS 60 Minutes, ABC, NBC Today, BBC, CNN and in other major electronic and print media.

Comments for this post are closed