Month: January 2012
Or is it the other way around? From the always-excellent Leonard Monasterio, in turn from Adriano Dutra Teixeira:
Angélica Grill, a all-you-can-eat barbecue buffet (rodízio) in São Paulo, offers a 50% discount for people that went through bariatric surgery. In Portuguese: In English (Google Translation of the page).
It is mostly “food only,” but a few other things too. Feel free to follow, and please do spread the word if you can. My normal tweeting will continue at @tylercowen as well.
Why does Switzerland have a low unemployment rate?
1. The Swiss have few ZMPers, so their natural rate is fairly low to begin with.
2. The Swiss do not have the same kind of welfare state and labor legislation that you find say in France, which also lowers their natural rate, and which makes adjustment to negative shocks easier. Unemployment benefits are not so generous and they pretty much force you to try to find work again.
3. In the past the Swiss have managed their immigration policy in accord with the domestic unemployment rate. For instance if unemployment was rising they would send some Italian guest workers back home. Immigration into Switzerland is now so substantial, however, and integrated into so many sectors, that this procedure has lost its potency.
4. Swiss jobs are relatively permanent, compared to the United States. You will note that #4 interacts with #3; immigration is by no means always or even usually zero-sum with respect to the jobs in a country, but it can be for some well-defined pockets of manufacturing jobs in Switzerland.
5. The Swiss central bank does not hesitate to engage in sophisticated schemes of quantitative easing when an appreciating exchange rate is squeezing their export industries or they otherwise face unpleasant macroeconomic situations.
Here is a JSTOR piece on said question. Here is a good paper on the overall topic (pdf). I have never seen a good paper on why the Swiss unemployment rate rose somewhat in the early 1990s, falling again in 1996 or so I believe, but MR readers can help us out here. I also do not have knowledge of exactly how the Swiss calculate their unemployment rate, though it is unlikely that the difference in rates is a mere statistical artifact.
Class started yesterday, the reading list is here (pdf):
The New English Bible, Oxford Study Edition, Billy Budd and Other Tales, by Hermann Melville. The Metamorphosis, In the Penal Colony, and Other Stories, by Franz Kafka, In the Belly of the Beast, by Jack Henry Abbott, Borges and the Eternal Orangutans, by Fernando Verrissimo, Glaspell’s Trifles, available on-line, Sherlock Holmes, The Complete Novels and Stories, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, volume 1, I, Robot, by Isaac Asimov, Moby Dick, by Hermann Melville, excerpts, chapters 89 and 90, available on-line. Year’s Best SF 9, edited by David G. Hartwell and Kathryn Cramer, G.K. Chesterton, The Man Who Was Thursday, Edgar Allen Poe, The Gold-Bug, available on-line, Joseph Conrad, The Secret Agent, Running the Books, by Avi Steinberg, Sakhalin Island, Anton Chekhov. tr. Brian Reeve, Death and the Maiden, Ariel Dorfman, The Pledge, Friedrich Durrenmatt. tr. Joel Agee, Red Harvest, Dashiell Hammett, Red April, by Santiago Roncagliolo, The Crime of Sheila McGough, Janet Malcolm, Leslie Katz, “John Keats’s Attitudes to Lawyers,” http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1307146.
Some additions to this list will be made as we proceed, mostly a few short articles. We also will view a small number of movies on legal themes. You will be responsible for obtaining these or for viewing them in the theater.
The Church of Kopimism, whose principal tenent is the right to file-share, has been formally recognized as a religious organization in Sweden.
The Swedish government agency Kammarkollegiet registered the Church of Kopimism as a religious organization in late December, just before Christmas, the group said in a Wednesday statement. Members of the church applied three times in their more than year-long quest to have the religion formally recognized in Sweden.
Sweden is now the first and only country to recognize Kopimism as a religion, the group said.
“For the Church of Kopimism, information is holy and copying is a sacrament,” it said in a statement.
Christianity remains the leading contender. In the meantime, file under “The Culture that is Sweden.” I thank Eric H. for the pointer.
Addendum: And here is Matt Yglesias on Europe as Conservative. I agree with the points he makes, but that Europe is not very Christian, and that America tries to do more to raise the status of Christianity and Christians, deserves further discussion.
5. The culture that is Japan, with obscenity.
6. Scott is right on the mark (not a surprise). That’s the place to start the dialogue, not endless rehashing of the errors of others.
That is the new book by Justin Yifu Lin, who is also Chief Economist of the World Bank. It is derived from lectures delivered in China. Much of the book is an OK survey, though I did not find it added much insight to extant accounts.
The discussion of why China had no Industrial Revolution does not consider individualism or liberalism, a’la McCloskey. And what am I to make of sentences like this?:
Building the new socialist countryside, now on the right track, has produced remarkable results.
I suppose it can be held to be true in both the literal and Straussian senses, but when I read it (and some others) frankly I felt my intelligence was being insulted.
There is plenty of talk lately about ethics standards for economists. How about a new proposal? For anything in the social sciences written by a citizen of China, or by someone with relatives living in China, or by someone working in or for China, there should be a disclaimer on the publication: “Produced under conditions of censorship and threat of career penalty.” I don’t favor actually doing that, but the absence of this idea from the debate is itself revealing.
In 2004 I wrote In Praise of Impersonal Medicine arguing:
I have nothing against my physician but I would prefer to be diagnosed by a computer. A typical physician spends most of the day playing twenty questions. Where does it hurt? Do you have a cough? How high is the patient’s blood pressure? But an expert system can play twenty questions better than most people. An expert system can use the best knowledge in the field, it can stay current with the journals, and it never forgets.
and in 2006 I noted:
The practice of modern medicine is surprisingly primitive…My credit card company knows far more about my shopping history than my physician knows about my medical history.
I now believe that we are on the cusp of major changes to medicine. The thousand dollar genome sequence is less than a year away, Ford has just developed a car seat that can monitor your health, many people are already using wrist monitors to measure heart and sleep patterns. All of this data will soon be combined with massive databases to offer predictive and prescriptive health diagnosis.
In Do We Need Doctors or Algorithms the venture capitalist Vinod Khosla expands:
IBM’s Watson computer… is now being applied to medical diagnosis after handling imprecise and vague tasks like winning at Jeopardy, which experts a few years ago would have said could not be done. “Computers cannot match the judgment of humans on these kinds of tasks!” And with enough data, medical diagnosis or 90% of it is an easier task than Jeopardy.
Already Kaiser Permanent already has 10 million real-time medical records with details of 30,000,000 e-visits last year with caregivers and computer modeling of key diseases per individual that data scientists would love to get their hand on. Already, according to IDC 14% of the US population is using their phones for medical help and 200 million health and fitness related mobile applications have been downloaded according to pyramid research. Fun stuff, though early. They are probably two generations away from systems that are actually useful.
…But I doubt very much if within 10-15 years (given continued investment and innovation and keeping the AMA from quashing such efforts politically) I won’t be able to ask Siri’s great great grandchild (Version 9.0?) for an opinion far more accurate than the one I get today from the average physician. Instead of asking Siri 9.0, “I feel like sushi” or “where can I dispose a body” (try it…it’s fairly accurate!) and with your iPhone X or Android Y with all the power of IBM’s current Watson computer in the mobile phone and an even more powerful “Nvidia times 10-100” server which will cost far less than med school with terabytes or petabytes of data on hundreds of millions (billions?) of patients, including their complete genomics and proteomics (each sample costing about the same as a typical blood test).
1. Dave Prager, Delirious Delhi: Inside India’s Incredible Capital. An excellent book on India, an excellent book on a city, and an excellent book on Delhi, all rolled into one. Unlike many travel books, it tells you a lot about the city. Here is a short excerpt. I believe it does not yet have full availability in the United States; order it from the first link above, the author tells me that the current Amazon link is actually a fraud.
2. Katerina Clark, Moscow, The Fourth Rome: Stalinism, Cosmopolitanism, and the Evolution of Soviet Culture, 1931-1941. A detailed and insightful revisionist look at Soviet culture during that period, asking whether it really can all be boiled down to communism or if there was more behind it and it turns out there was.
3. David Roodman, Due Diligence: An Impertinent Inquiry into Microfinance. Puts microfinance into a broader historical perspective, balanced and insightful throughout, informationally dense, recommended. A good model for many other non-fiction books.
4. Michael Erard, Babel No More: The Search for the World’s Most Extraordinary Language Learners. A fun and useful book, you can take the subtitle literally. You need to ignore the very weak material on neurodevelopmental issues.
5. John Cowper Powys, Wolf Solent. Unlike George Steiner’s claim, this is not comparable to Tolstoy. Still, it is an excellent if uneven 1920s novel that ought to be read more widely. The best passages are frequent and striking. The bottom line is that I can imagine someday reading it again. If you are tempted, give it a try.
There is also the self-explanatory Emrys Westacott, The Virtues of Our Vices: A Modest Defense of Gossip, Rudeness, and Other Bad Habits.
…we said the ECB’s decision in September to accept unlisted bank bonds — i.e., bonds that the banks could have issued purely to themselves solely in order to pledge them as collateral for central bank funding — was “potentially very significant”.
I am looking for good writings on whether science has become an overly specialized endeavor, and if so what are the scientific and social consequences of that development? Any leads you might offer would be most appreciated. Of course this could cover many different fields.
2. A pizza parable: when arbitrage becomes more costly.
5. Fukuyama on European identity and whether the French succeeded after all.
There once was a Limerick that fell off the map,
The Irish said Google must take the rap,
They tried further zoom,
Cuz’ there wasn’t the room,
Making everyone happy ain’t always on tap.
Here is some text from the post:
One way to look at the US job market is to break it up into two components: jobs generated by structurally “impaired” and “non-impaired” sectors. Credit Suisse defines structurally impaired sectors to “include real estate related industries, finance, manufacturing, and the state and local government sector.” These are the sectors that at least in part rode the “bubble” economy wave. Many of these jobs were credit dependent, with growth beyond what the economy could sustain naturally.
The chart below shows the job creation and loss of the two components. The structurally impaired sector jobs created during the period of over-capacity growth simply never returned. The sectors were highly credit dependent and with all the deleveraging taking place, the jobs are not likely to come back any time soon…
On the other hand job growth of the non-impaired sectors has almost returned to the pre-crisis levels.
Could it be that 2011 is what macroeconomic recovery looks like, minus the remaining structural problems? Hat tip goes to FT Alphaville for the pointer, and here is my earlier post on the disaggregated aggregate demand.