Sunday assorted links

1. Chilean citizen lasers take down drones.

2. Those new service sector jobs is this a Straussian reference to the Rolling Stones song?

3. “Lotto lout Michael Carroll reveals he is ‘happier now’ working seven days a week as a £10-an-hour coalman after blowing £10m jackpot on drink, drugs and brothels (and claims he slept with 4,000 women).”  Link here.

4. BallerBusters “calls out” the phony rich people who in fact don’t have much money (NYT).

5. They let 70 different teams study the same fMRI results, you can imagine what happened.

Comments

'They let 70 different teams study the same fMRI results, you can imagine what happened.'

They said that deregulating tree cutting in California would help with wildfires?

It's ill written, that abstract, but I think it's saying, in a rather mealy-mouthed way, that interpretation of fMRI results is a bit of a lottery. Or, put another way, don't believe anything you are told based on such results.

That's disappointing: I know that was the state of play a few years ago but I had assumed that fMRI had moved on from the fairy-story stage.

You do understand that the purpose of an MRI is to give you more information than you have without it. What you do with that info isn't the fault of the mri.

You get data but scarcely info: you'd need a near-unanimous agreement among the interpreters of the data before you'd call it info.

That doesn't seem right. Anything that increases the probability that you'll ultimately come up with the right answer is information. Even if the fMRI was 100% guaranteed to lead you in the wrong direction, if you knew that you'd improve your diagnostics (a lot, actually), and so the fMRI would be giving you information, not just data.

"Anything that increases the probability that you'll ultimately come up with the right answer is information."

And... does it?

Respond

Add Comment

“ Even if the fMRI was 100% guaranteed to lead you in the wrong direction, IF YOU KNEW THAT [caps added] you'd improve your diagnostics (a lot, actually)”

But that’s the kicker: you don’t know that.

Respond

Add Comment

Respond

Add Comment

Respond

Add Comment

Respond

Add Comment

Respond

Add Comment

Somebody still has admin rights, it seems. Which puts an entirely different light on what has been going on in this comment section.

Respond

Add Comment

Respond

Add Comment

4. If I was on Instagram, I'd be following BallerBusters - that sounds fascinating. Lorenz has what I consider a companion piece to that from her Atlantic days on "fake sponcon", or people pretending to make sponsored content so it makes it look like they have sponsors, hopefully netting . . . real sponsors.

"Fake it till you make" never dies, just takes on new iterations in new mediums.

And this is why people have a NYT subscription.... they let people know what is being posted to Twitter that day!

Respond

Add Comment

Respond

Add Comment

#1 HOW DARE THEY!

The instinctual response to a drone is that South America must be the 3rd world antidote to American supremacy. Look at Russia--it's never been a question of how drones function there because we are assured of destruction. By antitdote, I mean to imply what American hegemonism looks like in a virtual world.

Respond

Add Comment

Respond

Add Comment

3. Is this a Straussian post in support an estate tax at high rates rather than a wealth tax?

And the Straussian post on tax cuts: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/17/business/how-fedex-cut-its-tax-bill-to-0.html

Respond

Add Comment

Well, he left 4M pounds to friends and family. Are you saying that the tax system should penalize such generosity towards one's family to push people to spend even more on booze, drugs, and prostitutes?

Respond

Add Comment

Respond

Add Comment

#4 Do you think he could look into how certain people came into their money?

Imposter

Was he just an imposter or did he really earn his money through the hedge fund?

Respond

Add Comment

Respond

Add Comment

The only thing I’m sure of is that Ghislaine Maxwell will never darken the door of a jail cell nor courthouse.

Respond

Add Comment

Respond

Add Comment

Even the rich don't have money. They have assets.
http://perkurowski.blogspot.com/2018/10/redistributing-wealth-is-not-as.html

Even this guy ?

Money is mainly the numerator; their assets aren't exactly pressurized.

Respond

Add Comment

Respond

Add Comment

Respond

Add Comment

#4

'Bjg Hat -- No Cattle'

...deceptive signaling of status/wealth is commonplace and often successful in human societies.

(what's Trump's actual personal net worth? $$$?)

Maybe like Becky Sharp and her husband in Vanity Fair they will succeed in fooling other people like themselves.

Respond

Add Comment

Respond

Add Comment

Manhattan Family Seeks Social Media Coordinator (and mother's helper)? You can sit down and start writing the film script right now -- Just decide if it's going to be a witty rom-com or a more traditional three-hanky soap opera

Respond

Add Comment

4. My southern grandmother-in-law managed to create the same effect long after the money mostly ran out with a mantra of "We don't buy things - we have things."

Respond

Add Comment

No. 3: I doubt any male bonking 4000 women would be happy. :-)

Respond

Add Comment

That Rolling Stones song is a reference to quaaludes, which were prescribed to housewives in the 50s and early 60s to stabilize mood, they were commonly known and even marketed as "mother's little helper".

Not quaaludes, but Miltowns and later Valium. Didn't they say "little yellow pill" in the song? Luudes must be red, since one of the street names for them is reds.

Somewhat off topic, will someone on this site explain what Straussian is taken to mean? All I can find on the internets is that it means following Strauss, but when I look him up he seems to be just a middle-rent academic bullshitter with nothing much to say. Is there some sort of secret meaning?

You don't think he had much to say because you don't understand the difference between the exoteric meaning of his writings intended for the clueless public like you and the obscure esoteric meaning, which is usually closer to the opposite of the exoteric meaning.

Respond

Add Comment

You are right, I mixed up my 1960s commercially available and widely prescribed sedatives. Also, I believe quaaludes are usually white.

Respond

Add Comment

Respond

Add Comment

Respond

Add Comment

3: The General Truth is this: give a man an unearned $10 million and he's just going to spend it on his wang. Just like if you give a man undeserved power, he's going to go full Bill Clinton, and abuse women in service of his wang.

How many times do you need to see this play out before you accept it as truth? Maybe five hundred more will do it for you.

While Tyler pretends that driverless cars are right around the corner, just waiting to change out lives... something else actually is. Technology is going to allow a great many men to have sex lives as varied and exciting as Bill Clinton -- but without the rape. It's going to have yuge implications.

Just as you seem to be. Slight correction-- Bill Clinton was serving his wang before he had power, or attempting to serve his wang, same as everyone else. It doesn't necessarily follow that abuse was involved.

The major difference with Bill is the almost 50 year record of him being a known sexual predator.

Respond

Add Comment

Respond

Add Comment

Respond

Add Comment

#3) "...after blowing £10m jackpot on drink, drugs and brothels"

The rest, he wasted.

The real story is here

Respond

Add Comment

Comment of the day!

Many years ago one of my sons asked, "Dad, why do you let Mom waste all your money on clothes and food?"

Question: Are UK Lotto winnings tax free? If not, he likely netted a lot less than 10 million.

Respond

Add Comment

Respond

Add Comment

#3) Wow, look how bad globalization and multinational corporations have made things for blue collar laborers. Even when one of them wins a lottery, if their life of despair doesn't drive them to opioid addiction, then the despair causes them to spend all their money on booze, other drugs, and women. Or, at least, that's the conclusion that one must draw if one has adopted currently fashionable anti-neoliberal sentiments on privilege, unequal outcomes, and wealth and income inequality.

Respond

Add Comment

#5: The authors include Colin Camerer and what appears to be at least one other economist. I wonder how Camerer would compare the range of conclusions that 70 research teams would draw from a set of fMRI scans to the range of conclusions that 70 economists would draw from a big set of economic data?

From the abstract it's not clear to me how far apart the 70 teams were in their conclusions. There was clearly a good deal of distance, but seemingly they could be reconciled with meta-analysis.

Economists still don't agree on the causes of the Great Depression -- OTOH I'd guess there's a pretty good consensus with 50-60 out of 70 being broadly in agreement and 10-20 having contrarian views.

Respond

Add Comment

#2 - answer is no.

Respond

Add Comment

#2 - in upper middle class homes throughout the land, a woman or teenage girl employed to help the mother is known as a mother's helper. (Maybe a different word is used in Northern Virginia.) In a bit of irony, the song simply transfers that term to a pill (tranquilizer, not soporific).

The new twist is social media coordinator, which turns a perfectly ordinary job opportunity into a really weird one.

Respond

Add Comment

What the heck happened here, a discussion on election choice was deleted because it veered to moral dilemma?

I hope Tyler isn't trying to police his blog so that 2020 is only about things like wealth taxes, and stuff like war crimes cannot be considered.

That itself would show a serious moral vacancy.

Respond

Add Comment

And if anyone tries "war crimes are not economics .."

Jesus Christ, war crime bans are Game Theory!

Respond

Add Comment

Respond

Add Comment