Extreme carcinogenic doses for rats

by on December 13, 2005 at 4:52 am in Science | Permalink

Here is a defense of using those rat tests to judge what will cause cancer in humans:

The "junk science" they are referring to is the long-standing and
well-confirmed practice of identifying chemicals likely to cause cancer
in humans by testing them in animals. The animals (rodents) are a
standard model for biological processes of relevance to humans (which
is why drug companies and medical researchers have been using them for
a century). They are well understood and are the only sentinels for
detecting carcinogenicity of any use to public health. Since chemically
induced cancer has a latency period of decades (typically 20 years or
more), waiting for it to appear in human populations would meant that
once detected, even if exposure would cease instantly (which can never
happen), it would take another 20 or more years to eliminate the
cancers from exposure (all the cancers induced in the 20 years exposure
prior to detection). But even then, the chances of detecting any but
the most powerful carcinogens in human populations (via epidemiology)
is small. Epidemiology is a very insensitive tool. I say this with some
authority, as I am a cancer epidemiologist specializing in chemical
exposures and have authored numerous peer reviewed studies in that area
over many years.

The main rhetorical lever ACSH employs is the
use of high doses in the animal studies, doses that are much higher
than usually faced by humans. But as ACSH knows well (but didn’t
divulge) there is a technical requirement for using these doses. If one
were to use doses in animals predicted to cause cancer at a rate we
would consider a public health hazard, we would need tens of thousands
of animals to test a single dose, mode of exposure and rodent species
or strain. This makes using those doses infeasible. Thus a Maximum
Tolerated Dose is used, one that causes no other pathology except
possibly cancer and doesn’t result in more than a 10% weight loss. The
assumption here is that something that causes cancer at high doses in
these animals will also do so at low doses. This is biologically
reasonable. It is a (surprising) fact, that most chemicals, given in no
matter how high a dose, won’t cause the very unusual and specific
biological effect of turning an animal cell cancerous. Cancer cells are
not "damaged" cells in the individual sense but "super cells," capable
of out competing normal cells. It is only in the context of the whole
organism that there is a problem. It is not surprising, then, that very
few chemicals would have be ability to turn a normal cell into a
biological super cell of this type. Estimates are that is far less than
10%, perhaps only 1% of all chemicals that have this ability. Thus
western industrial civilization doesn’t have to come to a screeching
halt if we eliminate industrial chemical carcinogens from our
environment.

We know of no false negatives with this process.
Every chemical we know that causes cancer in humans also does so in
rodents (with the possible exception of inorganic trivalent arsenic,
which is equivocal).

Here is the full post.  I’m not close to having the expertise to evaluate these claims, but two points.  First, the author is highly qualified; as a blogger he is anonymous but I can vouch for his credentials.  Second, it should be the self-appointed task of bloggers to pass along arguments which either struck them or which might shake up their readers.

dsquared December 13, 2005 at 6:47 am

Seems like a sensible defence of science against the claque of “junk science” hacks. Since economics is ontopic for this blog, though, I’m not so sure about this bit:

["Estimates are that is far less than 10%, perhaps only 1% of all chemicals that have this ability. Thus western industrial civilization doesn't have to come to a screeching halt if we eliminate industrial chemical carcinogens from our environment."]

Not all chemicals are equal, surely? I would be much less confident in a blanket pronouncement that there was no set of chemicals equal to 1% of all chemicals which could not be withdrawn without bringing Western industrial socity to a halt.

DrQ December 13, 2005 at 9:00 am

The real question, however, is “What is the safe dose of any chemical for humans?”. These are the facts that allow us to determine risk of exposure, identify at-risk populations and apply meaningful regulations. The “high-dose in rats” experiments only identify the potential for human carcinogenic activity. It is a profound logical and biological error to assume that a compound which is harmful at high doses will exert the same effect at low doses; an assumption which is clearly made by this anonymous blogger.
“The assumption here is that something that causes cancer at high doses in these animals will also do so at low doses. This is biologically reasonable.”

There are many things which at high doses are harmful, even lethal, for humans: water, salt, even excessive food consumption. Yet all of these things are safe and even necessary at low doses.

sprice December 13, 2005 at 9:36 am

This is another area, like nuclear power, where scientists and engineers have frustrated the public good due to poor communication. The scientists assume everyone is clear regarding the meaning of the results, their scope and potiential uses so no abuse of the data will occur. Consumer advocates have proven this idea false.

This type of study has its merits to determine possible carcinogens but has little use with regards to risk to humans. Maximizing banifit to potential risk is the true end goal but the work seems to end at the identification of the offending substance. Instead of having clear advice for public health we have litigation against teh offenders and advertisements promoting(defending) chemistry on TV.

John Kelsey December 13, 2005 at 10:05 am

Dr Q: I’m no expert in any of this, but I think you responded to a different argument than the anonymous blogger made. He said that using high doses of chemicals on rats gave good information about whether they were carcinogenic–not whether they were generically harmful. He’s trying to detect a specific effect of the chemical (causing mutations to the DNA in some cells that helps them along toward becoming cancerous), and because the effect is small at the low doses we usually see in the environment, he’s trying to amplify the effect by using much higher doses. Now, how well this tracks to P(cancer|exposure at dose X) in humans is an empirical question, but it’s not obviously unreasonable to use this technique to determine that probability / dose relationship.

Sebastian Holsclaw December 13, 2005 at 11:41 am

The problem with using these tests in court is that they are well off point. Water is dangerous when consumed in large enough amounts. The question is whether or not a particular drug poses an unreasonable risk. These kinds of tests offer no insight into that question.

Adam December 13, 2005 at 5:06 pm

Regarding the “anything can be toxic” argument: these tests distinguish between general toxicity and carcinogenesis.

The reason that we need these special tests for carcinogenesis is that it is such a delayed effect, so it’s often hard to identify the cause of cancer.

The basic argument is that what happens in the lab is not the same as what happens in reality: guess what–that’s true of ANYTHING done in a lab.

It’s pretty obvious that the “American Council on Health and Science” is a corporate front-group that with no concern for “health and science”–and only views them as obstacles to making a buck.

Their problem is not with the science, per se, but with how that knowledge is applied in our social/legal system. However, for PR, it is much easier to attack “junk science” than it is to push the idea that they should be able to dump anything that they want into our environment until it has absolutely, positively, been shown to cause immense damage to humans.

dearieme December 13, 2005 at 7:59 pm

“We know of no false negatives with this process. Every chemical we know that causes cancer in humans also does so in rodents” answers the wrong question. Is it the case that everything that causes cancer in rodents causes it in humans?

jadagul December 14, 2005 at 5:51 am

Had this discussion at Reason earlier today. Besides the Ames interview in Reason that Mr Schwarz linked, which is very good (Ames invented the Ames test, which is an important test for mutagens and often confused with a test for carcinogens), this article ( http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=00019A70-0C1C-1F41-B0B980A841890000&sc=I100322 ) from Scientific American is very good. Simple summary: many chemicals and other effects that are harmful in large doses are actually beneficial in small doses; the body overcompensates for the damage and actually becomes less likely to suffer from cancer or toxicity. So the testing in rats may well give good information on whether a chemical can be a carcinogenI’m not qualified to judge, although it seems totally plausiblebut it doesn’t tell you anything about which doses are helpful and which harmful. I suspect that we consistently tend to set thresholds far lower than we ought.

Add to this Dr Ames’s point that you get exposed to more known carcinogens from a cup of coffee than you will from a years’ worth of pesticides on produce, and I’m pretty skeptical.

Jim Hu December 14, 2005 at 10:52 am

After following jadaqul’s link to the Sci Am article, MR readers may have made ALL the points in my long post!

David December 12, 2006 at 12:03 am

Biotech Combany in India Supplying Jatrobha Curcas Feeds and Tissue culture Saplings of Orchids and Other Cut Flower Varietiess.

gill July 10, 2007 at 11:11 pm

wanyamin 07年7月11日

wow gold
wow gold
powerleveling
powerleveling
wow power leveling
wow power leveling
wow powerleveling
wow powerleveling
world of warcraft powerleveling
world of warcraft powerleveling
world of warcraft power leveling
world of warcraft power leveling
cheap wow powerleveling
cheap wow powerleveling
cheap wow power leveling
cheap wow power leveling
hongkong hotel
hongkong hotel
beijing tour
beijing tour

门禁
集团电话
集团电话
光盘制作
光盘印刷
光盘印刷
红外测温仪
红外测温仪
超声波测厚仪
超声波测厚仪
超声波探伤仪
超声波探伤仪
频闪仪
频闪仪
涂层测厚仪
涂层测厚仪
电火花检测仪
电火花检测仪
搬家公司
搬家公司
北京搬家公司
网站设计
网站设计
多媒体

google排名
wow gold
翻译公司
翻译公司
上海翻译公司
上海翻译公司
北京翻译公司
北京翻译公司
è´§æž¶
è´§æž¶
è´§æž¶
猎头
猎头
软件测试工程师
软件测试工程师
软件测试
软件测试
软件测试培训
软件测试培训
仓库
仓库
仓库出租
仓库出租
物流园区
物流园区

摆闸
痤疮
痤疮
色斑
色斑
黄褐斑
黄褐斑
青春痘
青春痘
口腔医生
口腔医生
口腔
口腔
口腔医院
口腔医院
口腔科
口腔科
三星集团电话机
呼叫中心
电话交换机
交换机
呼叫中心
测厚仪
测温仪
停车场
道闸

cheap Silkroad gold
cheap Silkroad gold
Silkroad gold
Silkroad gold
Silkroad Online gold
Silkroad Online gold
sro gold
sro gold
Archlord gold
Archlord gold
cheap Archlord gold
cheap Archlord gold
Archlord Online gold
Archlord Online gold
buy cheap Archlord gold
buy cheap Archlord gold
Dofus kamas
Dofus kamas
cheap Dofus kamas
cheap Dofus kamas
Dofus gold
Dofus gold
Dofus money
Dofus money
Rappelz Rupees
Rappelz Rupees
Rappelz gold
Rappelz gold
cheap Rappelz Rupees
cheap Rappelz Rupees

xdrs July 12, 2007 at 3:21 am

liying 07年7月12日

google排名
google排名
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
powerleveling
powerleveling
wow power leveling
wow power leveling
wow powerleveling
wow powerleveling
world of warcraft powerleveling
world of warcraft powerleveling
world of warcraft power leveling
world of warcraft power leveling
hongkong hotel
hongkong hotel
beijing tour
beijing tour
翻译公司
翻译公司
上海翻译公司
上海翻译公司
门禁
北京翻译公司
北京翻译公司
google排名

集团电话
集团电话
仓库
仓库
仓库出租
仓库出租
物流园区
物流园区
搬家公司
搬家公司
北京搬家公司
搬家
搬家公司
搬家公司
北京搬家公司
北京搬家公司
china tour
china tour
多媒体
è´§æž¶
è´§æž¶
è´§æž¶
光盘刻录
光盘刻录
光盘制作
光盘制作
光盘印刷
光盘印刷

摆闸
痤疮
痤疮
色斑
色斑
黄褐斑
黄褐斑
青春痘
青春痘
口腔医生
口腔医生
口腔
口腔
口腔医院
口腔医院
口腔科
口腔科
三星集团电话机
呼叫中心
电话交换机
交换机
呼叫中心
测厚仪
测温仪
停车场
道闸

xdrs July 17, 2007 at 11:01 pm

liying 07年7月18日

google排名
google排名
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
powerleveling
powerleveling
wow power leveling
wow power leveling
wow powerleveling
wow powerleveling
world of warcraft powerleveling
world of warcraft powerleveling
world of warcraft power leveling
world of warcraft power leveling
hongkong hotel
hongkong hotel
beijing tour
beijing tour
翻译公司
翻译公司
上海翻译公司
上海翻译公司
门禁
北京翻译公司
北京翻译公司
google排名

超声波探伤仪
超声波探伤仪
物流园区
物流园区
搬家公司
搬家公司
北京搬家公司
搬家
搬家公司
搬家公司
北京搬家公司
北京搬家公司
beijing
beijing
china tour
china tour
great wall
beijing travel
beijing travel
china tour
china tour
网站设计
多媒体
è´§æž¶
è´§æž¶
è´§æž¶
光盘刻录
光盘刻录
光盘制作
光盘制作
光盘印刷
光盘印刷

摆闸
痤疮
痤疮
色斑
色斑
黄褐斑
黄褐斑
青春痘
青春痘
口腔医生
口腔医生
口腔
口腔
口腔医院
口腔医院
口腔科
口腔科
三星集团电话机
呼叫中心
电话交换机
交换机
呼叫中心
测厚仪
测温仪
停车场
道闸

gill July 26, 2007 at 2:49 am

wanyamin 07年7月26日

wow gold
wow gold
powerleveling
powerleveling
wow power leveling
wow power leveling
wow powerleveling
wow powerleveling
world of warcraft powerleveling
world of warcraft powerleveling
world of warcraft power leveling
world of warcraft power leveling
cheap wow powerleveling
cheap wow powerleveling
cheap wow power leveling
cheap wow power leveling
beijing tour
beijing tour
beijing
beijing
china tour
china tour
great wall
beijing travel
beijing travel
网站设计
网站设计
多媒体
光盘制作
超声波探伤仪
超声波探伤仪
搬家公司
搬家公司
北京搬家公司
google排名
wow gold
翻译公司
翻译公司
上海翻译公司
上海翻译公司
北京翻译公司
北京翻译公司
è´§æž¶
è´§æž¶
è´§æž¶
仓库

仓库
仓库出租
仓库出租
物流园区
物流园区
痤疮
痤疮
色斑
色斑
黄褐斑
黄褐斑
青春痘
青春痘
电话交换机
交换机
呼叫中心
cheap Silkroad gold
cheap Silkroad gold
Silkroad gold
Silkroad gold
Silkroad Online gold
Silkroad Online gold
sro gold
sro gold
Archlord gold
Archlord gold
cheap Archlord gold
cheap Archlord gold
Archlord Online gold
Archlord Online gold
buy cheap Archlord gold
buy cheap Archlord gold
Dofus kamas
Dofus kamas
cheap Dofus kamas
cheap Dofus kamas
Dofus gold
Dofus gold
Dofus money
Dofus money
Rappelz Rupees
Rappelz Rupees
Rappelz gold
Rappelz gold
cheap Rappelz Rupees
cheap Rappelz Rupees

Missliang August 14, 2007 at 9:59 pm

houyuping 07年8月15日

wow gold
wow gold
wow power leveling
wow power leveling
wow powerleveling
wow powerleveling
world of warcraft powerleveling
world of warcraft powerleveling
world of warcraft power leveling
world of warcraft power leveling
powerleveling
powerleveling
wow powerleveling
wow powerleveling
wow power leveling
wow power leveling
power leveling
power leveling
wow power level
wow power level
china tour
china tour

翻译公司
翻译公司
上海翻译公司
上海翻译公司
北京翻译公司
北京翻译公司
监控
è´§æž¶
鼓风机
风机
风机
涂层测厚仪
涂层测厚仪
红外测温仪
红外测温仪
超声波测厚仪
超声波测厚仪
超声波探伤仪
超声波探伤仪
频闪仪
频闪仪
涂层测厚仪
涂层测厚仪
电火花检测仪
电火花检测仪

google排名
门禁
门禁
门禁系统
门禁系统
搬家
搬家公司
北京搬家公司
光盘制作
光盘印刷
光盘印刷
搬家公司
激光打标机
搬家公司
北京搬家公司
hongkong hotel
hongkong hotel
beijing tour
beijing tour
集团电话
集团电话
china tour
china tour
青春痘
青春痘

Missliang August 16, 2007 at 2:04 am

houyuping 07年8月16日

wow gold
wow gold
wow power leveling
wow power leveling
wow powerleveling
wow powerleveling
world of warcraft powerleveling
world of warcraft powerleveling
world of warcraft power leveling
world of warcraft power leveling
powerleveling
powerleveling
wow powerleveling
wow powerleveling
wow power leveling
wow power leveling
power leveling
power leveling
wow power level
wow power level
china tour
china tour

翻译公司
翻译公司
上海翻译公司
上海翻译公司
北京翻译公司
北京翻译公司
监控
è´§æž¶
鼓风机
风机
风机
涂层测厚仪
涂层测厚仪
红外测温仪
红外测温仪
超声波测厚仪
超声波测厚仪
超声波探伤仪
超声波探伤仪
频闪仪
频闪仪
涂层测厚仪
涂层测厚仪
电火花检测仪
电火花检测仪

google排名
门禁
门禁
门禁系统
门禁系统
搬家
搬家公司
北京搬家公司
光盘制作
光盘印刷
光盘印刷
搬家公司
激光打标机
搬家公司
北京搬家公司
hongkong hotel
hongkong hotel
beijing tour
beijing tour
集团电话
集团电话
china tour
china tour
青春痘
青春痘

yuyan December 2, 2007 at 9:51 pm

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: