How to choose a charity

by on December 1, 2005 at 7:46 am in Education | Permalink

MR reader Jeffrey Drucker writes:

I’ll be graduating college in just a few weeks and entering the real world.  That is I’ll be a salaried employee making all budgetary decisions for myself.  Aside from the necessary components of spending, saving, and repaying my college loans I’d like to set a portion of my earnings aside for charitable donation.  I’ve always thought that charity was a crucial element of any caring libertarian’s mindset.  Now that I will be able to spend my own money, I wondered if you could provide any insight into the economic considerations of charity.

Obviously, the decision to donate is based on personal considerations and evaluations of the relative merit of different organizations.  But economically is it more sensible to donate to a wide number of worthy causes or champion just one.  Should I focus on issues closer to home or those who are in the most need the world over?  How large a percentage of my income is it reasonable to donate, what issues should I consider (value of investment opportunities, lifetime consumption)?

Putting political and intellectual non-profits aside, here are some principles for purely charitable giving: 

1. Published information on budget ratios devoted to programs and fundraising expenses is not reliable.  Many charities manipulate the data.

2. Consider neglected but long-simmering problems; read my earlier analysis of whether you should focus on the crisis of the day.

3. Hardly anyone gives enough to charity and you won’t either.  Pick a cause or causes you will become addicted to.  Tell others you won’t back down from your cause, so that you will lose face if you do.

4. My preferred approach is pure cash transfers to rural Mexicans, vis-a-vis Western Union.  You don’t get the tax break but administrative expenses are very low.  Think of Western Union as a for-profit charity.

5. In-kind aid sounds inefficient to the economist, but the commitment may make you happier.  You are wasting most of your time anyway.

6. Don’t give money to beggars, the explanation is here.

The comments are open for other suggestions.  Analytical principles are especially welcome.

Eric H December 1, 2005 at 8:02 am

0) Pick a target percentage of your income. Typical values range from 3-5%, with 5% levels typically coming from people in the lower quintiles (who are probably seniors, see the Statistical Abstract). The goal drives your giving (a Schelling point?), and knowing that you have a plan makes it easier to say no to unwanted solicitations.

1) Choose charities that reinforce rather than undermine property rights, e.g. Habitat for Humanity and The Nature Conservancy

Dave U December 1, 2005 at 8:44 am

I believe it is a moot point attempting to assess efficiency in the non-profit market. One of the fundamental principles of that market is that donors neither require nor receive:
a) accountability in the classic sense (shareholders get no say in operational decision making, and often will have no idea where the money goes specifically at all.)
b) greater returns to investment between 2 different charities

Given that, I recommend an alternative set of criteria.
1) Give to organizations whose missions generate the greatest personal utility for you. Give to an organization that utilizes a model you like, champions a cause you are passionate about, or targets a population you have a special interest in.
2) Avoid earmarking your funds – earmarking hinders the ability of organizations to fund important causes over urgent or glamorous ones. If you trust an organization with your money, trust them the whole way.
3) I like to fund organizations that don’t spam me with incredible amounts of literature. Junk mail and spam lower my personal utility from giving to charities.

Michael H. December 1, 2005 at 9:20 am

Don’t give to beggars – good advice.

Earlier this week some blog with ads plastered all over it had the nerve
to beg for money. I didn’t give any.

theCoach December 1, 2005 at 9:36 am

Sorry to take advantage of a comment thread, but there are people who would love some followup to your debate with Max. A response to Kevin Drum would be a good start. Thanks.

DK December 1, 2005 at 9:39 am

A third property-rights charity to consider is the Heifer Project, http://www.heifer.org , which gives livestock to poor farming families around the world — i.e. a direct infusion of the most important form of capital among the rural poor.

I love Habitat, but they have been criticized for their cost effectiveness and for mortgages which allegedly undermine the property rights/resale opportunities for homeowners, by giving Habitat rights to rebuy the houses cheaply if the homeowner wants to sell. I am not familiar with the details, but so far I continue to support Habitat.

The Nature Conservancy has been _heavily_ criticized for tax deals with their board members/major contributors. Check out the Washington Post series on them.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/nation/specials/natureconservancy/
Form your own opinion from the stories, but the general allegation is that they acquire large undeveloped land parcels, allow rich people to build houses on them, and then put in deed covenants preventing other development (which give the rich people tax breaks.)

Personally, I prefer to give to the international church charities — Episcopal Relief& Development for me, but Catholic Charities, Lutheran World Relief, and other groups for every religion and denomination are available. I like these b/c the churches already have an organization on the ground which (1) keeps additional overhead costs down — instead of sending expensive American consultants to Kenya, you use local Kenyan priests to run things; (2) provides good information on small, local needs, such as the individual poor people Tyler gives to; (3) provides a supervision system with strong moral norms. Obviously, your mileage may vary here depending on your religious belief and/or trust.

Hei Lun Chan December 1, 2005 at 10:18 am

Given that for many people part of charity is to make one feel better about oneself, I’d recommend giving to one charity each year instead of ten. Otherwise it’s likely that at least one of these charities will share your information with other organizations and you’ll be annoyed every day from the dozens of solicitations you’ll be getting each month.

I also second the recommendation for the Heifer Project. One of the best things about them is that when you give money to them you know how your money’s going to be spent.

David Zaring December 1, 2005 at 11:19 am

There’s a case out there – and two minutes of google research failed to reveal it to me – that one should give to one charity only. Something about economies of scale? I dunno, but single charity giving does limit the expressive, self-regarding upside of donating smaller sums to a variety of causes one likes.

Michael H. December 1, 2005 at 11:36 am

DK
I do know about Habitat and their issues with the “restrictive covenants”
Basically, Habitat homes are rent-to-own. They are a great deal, but the
“lease” puts a lot of conditions on the homes that make them much less valuable to homeowners. For example, you cannot rent rooms out.

This last point brings up the very most objectionable thing about Habitat: they beg local goverments to waive property tax. The reason they claim this need is because their homeowners are responsible for the increases in tax due to the increases in appraised value (something very relavent around the country recently). They claim that their homeowners are unable to pay the extra tax because they are not able to rent rent rooms or get a home equity loan or otherwise profit from the increase in their home value (until the end of their 20 year covenant). But this condition was created entirely by Habitat! It is ridiculous for Habitat to beg for charity for their homeowners when they created the problem in the first place.

Btw, the previous comment was intended as a joke, but may not have come off that way.

michael vassar December 1, 2005 at 12:05 pm

Expected utility dictates a single charity until you believe that your chosen charity is adequately funded. Economically we should use each dollar to buy the good which provides the greatest marginal utility. In general in life we buy a varied basket of goods because the marginal utility of a given good diminishes as consumption of that good increases. With our first dollar we buy good A (food prehaps, or possibly a drug), as the utility of the first unit of A is greatest, then, after consuming 3 or 4 units of A, its marginal utility has fallen beneath that of the first unit of B (some clothing? fuel?) you spend your next dollar to buy a unit of B. For charitable giving, given typical donors and much larger typical charities the marginal utility of a donation is strictly linear with size (increasing slightly at first due to the initial disutility of getting on a mailing list unless you like being on mailing lists more than you like your preferred charity saving the money it costs them to send mail out, a feature of your potential character that you would loose utility by recognizing if it is true of you now that I have pointed it out ). The charity will do as much good with your second $1000 as with your first. It follows that a rational donor will always a) donate exclusively to charities that he/she can fund to an extent sufficient to reduce their marginal utility for a dollar or b) donate to only a single charity. It also follows that a rational donor will, before tax and social considerations, and ignoring response to disasters, never donate anything until their other net consumption (consumption on goods which do not raise their economic productivity) exceeds a threshold, and subsequently donate all of their surplus earnings. However, their gross consumption (typically simple called consumption) may continue to rise. For instance, they may invest an increasing amount in capital goods which increase their earnings potential by raising their status, self-esteem, productivity, or time efficiency even after passing the donation threshold, because as their income increases the utility of such goods may rise above that of money donated to a charity due to the goods being complements of income. Also, a rational entity with only partial control of their utility function will invest in retaining their current utility function, so if they sense that donating another dollar to charity X will cause them resentment which will undermine their desire to donate to charity X in the future they may refrain.

Joel December 1, 2005 at 12:31 pm

The Motley Fool generally has a good list of capitalist-friendly charities each year with “Foolanthropy”.

http://www.fool.com/foolanthropy/2005/foolanthropy2005.htm

Another Heifer mention! And on a personal note, I volunteed for them once and milked a goat :)

DK December 1, 2005 at 1:46 pm

We should distinguish between _charity_ and (also voluntary) _tipping_. IMHO, giving to your college or your favorite blog should not be in the same category as giving to starving 3rd world children. Instead, it is a tip you give (a) to signify your gratitude/received utility for service and (b) to show you are a good member of a community and not a free-rider. Thus, I do not see giving to your college as fulfilling your moral obligation to help the poor, only as fulfilling a different obligation.

I had some friends at my (richly endowed ivy) undergrad college who declared that they would never donate to the school, b/c their endowment was already sufficient for all reasonable needs, while starving children in the 3rd world have real needs. Their reasoning was wrong b/c it ignored the tipping/free-rider aspects of the problem. But I still have sympathy for their viewpoint, b/c the school in question really does have enough money to make tuition free forever if they so chose.

p.s. this is largely a response to Michael H’s joke and the college-giving comment above, but yes, I realize it is a joke, and I laughed.

michael vassar December 1, 2005 at 2:52 pm

By the way, a few charities combine small size and high expected utility to such a degree that they break down any issues of altruism. Donations to the Singularity Institute http://www.singinst.org , and the Methusaleh Prize http://www.mprize.org/ constitute rational investments based on expected payoff and lack of correlation to other investment payoffs. If you care about the well-being of other people, that’s simply a multiplier effect that makes the expected utility of giving to them even higher. The only reason not to donate is the variance of expected returns and the possibility that their actual expected value is lower than it appears because of time discounting or subjective time discounting. Do you discount the utility of your 100 year distant future self by 1,000,100 years if he has been living at a 2000-fold accelerated rate for 50 of those years?

DK December 1, 2005 at 3:55 pm

Michael Vassar, in your last post, I’m not I follow you. do you mean that what I call “tipping” is “This new good”, that not tipping is effectively stealing, and that therefore not tipping is equivalent to consumption (of some form of social capital?) I think I agree with you, but I am not entirely sure.

My point really is just that to me, charity and “tipping” your alma mater are not substitutable goods. If I send Princeton a check, I might gain a good feeling, but I will never feel that it gets me off the hook for sending a check to feed starving children. This may just be my own personal preference, though, and not applicable to many others.

Michael H. December 1, 2005 at 4:32 pm

I like Noumenon’s idea of a charity “index fund”. Basically there are economies of scale in researching really good charities from bad ones and specialists could find good charitiable investments just like a mutual fund manager picks good stocks. Except there might be more value-added from the labor of a charity fund picker because market there is no real reason to think that the return on all charitable investments is nearly the same.

Who would start such a fund. Maybe Fidelity and Vanguard and the others could. I think that is an excellent idea.

Btw, wasn’t that kind of the idea behind United Way?

WMCW December 1, 2005 at 5:16 pm

I think it might be necessary to specify if the question is about only one person or any, and eventually every person.
If the recommendation is for everyone I would suggest not to give for charity. Tipping makes salary fall and makes noise in labour market. Charitable society makes similar problems.
Political advise: I live in a Third World poor rural area. We would prefer no subsidies in USA and EU and real free-trade (labour too) more than free cows and charity aid.

Thomas Mayer December 1, 2005 at 6:49 pm

A wesbsite, CharityNavigator provides useful financial information on charities. But there is a desparate need for information about the relative efficiencies of charities. Objective informnation on this would be hard to obtain, but a survey of professionals in the field might yield some useful, albeit biased, information.

Tom Mayer

davod December 1, 2005 at 8:17 pm

Check out how much the CEOs are paid:
Red Cross $600,000 per year
United Way $300,000
Salvation Army $13,000 plus board
The Kennedy that runs a non-profit for discounted heating oil $400,000 per year.

pb December 2, 2005 at 12:18 am

The awful truth is that you could give $5 more right now. Why aren’t you? There is a job you could take instead of watching TV, there is an opportunity to make more money instead of spending time with your family.. But you don’t.

If capitalism is the best way for society to flourish, why is charity necessary? At what point does you giving $5 more for 3rd world medications become equivalent to government Medicaid outlays? When you and a friend make it $10, or when you and 280 million not-friends make it 5 billion?

Michael H. December 2, 2005 at 7:53 am

Getting back to Noumenon’s idea of a charity “index fund”, there is the National Philantropic Trust:

http://www.nptrust.org/

Noumenon December 2, 2005 at 11:08 am

10% of my income isn’t a lot; it doesn’t look like the NPT would be interested in setting up a donor fund just for my biannual $6000. (I do the alternating standard/itemized donation thing too. You can’t deduct more than 33-50% of your income for that year, though.)

Ross Parker December 2, 2005 at 12:56 pm

The Danish International Development Agency (DANIDA) sat lots of clever bods down one day to decide who they should give money to. They ranked aid projects on the basis of bang-per-buck. The result was the Copenhagen Consensus (http://www.copenhagenconsensus.com/). Also, there was a post on the PSD blog about a ‘market’ for charities a while back, but I’ve lot it, I’m afraid.

Cathy December 2, 2005 at 11:15 pm

One more reason to give to one charity than many: it will reduce the number of charitable appeals you receive in the mail (see http://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm/bay/content.view/catid/68/cpid/254.htm).

Terry December 4, 2005 at 2:54 am

The Salvation Army is a very good choice. Absolute rock-bottom wastage of resources on overhead, and very cost effective delivery of services to the bottom rung of our society. Their performance during Katrina was very impressive. If your criterion is to maximize bang-for-the-buck then they are hard to beat (at least when you confine your attention to domestic charities. … Internationally, you can do an awful lot with a very small amount of money.)

md.fazlel mahbub lemon June 13, 2006 at 11:19 am

Hi every one!
My name is lemon, and somebody of this group is known person, and they are in my friendlist, And i have known about this group from one of them, At first i wanna thanks her! Actually i feeling shame to write here such kind of letter but i am ready to write anywhere yet it looks silly!
At first i beg ur purdon to waste ur important time, actually from last month i have changed my mind, and now i have no sense about right or wrong! true or false! because i am standing on that point where human can’t do anything, can’t think anything, can’t take decission instantly , and may be from this point a great maxim has created by someone “Man Cannot Live Alone!”
So i also need help of someone, i need support , i need strength to fight with my present condition, because at present i need help for my father’s treatment,he is heart patient, i need help for my baby,she needs food or cloths which is her basic rights, i need help for my whole family to assure their sleep in own room in bed, someone already heard about myself, and i am writing breif to those peoples who dont know my probolem yet!
Bank is gonna capture our home with our all properties even if a chair! because two years ago my father was taken bank loan for business purpose, and he was swiftly controlling his business and paying bank installment as well, but our country political condition is not healthy, and for our forthcoming election everywhere is spreading political movement and chaos! and ultimately the business condition was going decrease, and my father was also lost his business for strike, chaos, slogan etc. I know may be u will think that there was a lots of victims in those days, ya i agree with u, there was a lots of middle class business man has lost their business and there are a lots of family in our country is suffering such conditions, but someone is sacrificing their family and going to be finished silently, and they are cursing destiny for all happening, and someone is still trying to save their family and they are ready to sell their blood, i also was tried to get instant help from our country local charity organizations, if u ever read news about our country may be u know that our country is 5 times champion in corruption! so no need to say that the charity organizations will help poor undone family from that fund; which they got free!Huh!

I don’t wanna write long my story , may be someone is already has stopped reading! Only one request to u all that if anybody of this world can give me just one chance to turn back from present situation, then i can save my family, i don’t need help continue, i am not expecting money continuously, i could arrange those money but i need instantly because will not wait for me , already they gave us chance for human being! how long i will press them for awaiting?
Thanks all for give me the time. Just bless for me and my child, and bless to God so that he keep my father alive! because only for his family he was suffering. God give me the chance to pay back a little to him.
Bye. and thanks for create such kind of group.

Md. Fazlel Mahbub Lemon
Bangladesh.
lemon_880172837556@yahoo.com

xanax November 3, 2006 at 12:02 am

My friend Susan was a lady with a tender and soft heart. She had a troubled childhood and due to her past experiences she used to suffer from anxiety disorder. Being doctor, I decided to help her in her anxiety attacks, I asked her to buy xanax. This is the most useful drug for treating panic and anxiety disorder, so order xanax or alprazolam. The information for medication is available online; you can type xanax online on the Google bar and search. I asked her to buy xanax online so that she could avail the best deal and get cheap xanax. Thereafter, she has come back to her normal loving self; she is now a mother of one baby boy and a happy wife! Susan is thinking of starting a boutique. Thanks to xanax!!

pills April 18, 2007 at 2:33 am

Skin care prescription medicine with synalar tretinoin retin a and eurax
synalar synalar
tretinoin tretinoin
retin a retin a
eurax eurax

xdrs July 10, 2007 at 11:17 pm

liying 07年7月11日

google排名
google排名
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
powerleveling
powerleveling
wow power leveling
wow power leveling
wow powerleveling
wow powerleveling
world of warcraft powerleveling
world of warcraft powerleveling
world of warcraft power leveling
world of warcraft power leveling
hongkong hotel
hongkong hotel
beijing tour
beijing tour
翻译公司
翻译公司
上海翻译公司
上海翻译公司
门禁
北京翻译公司
北京翻译公司
google排名

集团电话
集团电话
仓库
仓库
仓库出租
仓库出租
物流园区
物流园区
搬家公司
搬家公司
北京搬家公司
搬家
搬家公司
搬家公司
北京搬家公司
北京搬家公司
china tour
china tour
多媒体
è´§æž¶
è´§æž¶
è´§æž¶
光盘刻录
光盘刻录
光盘制作
光盘制作
光盘印刷
光盘印刷

摆闸
痤疮
痤疮
色斑
色斑
黄褐斑
黄褐斑
青春痘
青春痘
口腔医生
口腔医生
口腔
口腔
口腔医院
口腔医院
口腔科
口腔科
三星集团电话机
呼叫中心
电话交换机
交换机
呼叫中心
测厚仪
测温仪
停车场
道闸

hyangel July 11, 2007 at 2:17 am

houyuping 07年7月11日

google排名
google排名
wow gold
wow gold
powerleveling
powerleveling
wow powerleveling
wow powerleveling
wow power leveling
wow power leveling
power leveling
power leveling
wow power level
wow power level
Ddo plat
Ddo plat
FFXI Gil
FFXI Gil
GW Gold
GW Gold
GW Power Leveling
GW Power Leveling
RS Gold
RS Gold

RS Power Leveling
RS Power Leveling
Lotro Gold
Lotro Gold
Lotro Power leveling
Lotro Power leveling
翻译公司
翻译公司
上海翻译公司
上海翻译公司
北京翻译公司
北京翻译公司
监控
è´§æž¶
è´§æž¶
è´§æž¶
涂层测厚仪
涂层测厚仪
翻译公司
仓库
仓库
仓库出租
仓库出租
物流园区
物流园区
红外测温仪
红外测温仪

超声波测厚仪
超声波测厚仪
超声波探伤仪
超声波探伤仪
频闪仪
频闪仪
涂层测厚仪
涂层测厚仪
电火花检测仪
电火花检测仪
google排名
门禁
门禁
门禁系统
门禁系统
搬家
搬家公司
北京搬家公司
光盘制作
光盘印刷
光盘印刷
搬家公司
激光打标机
搬家公司
北京搬家公司
hongkong hotel
hongkong hotel
beijing tour
beijing tour
集团电话
集团电话
wow power leveling
wow power leveling
wow powerleveling
wow powerleveling
wow power level
wow power level
china tour
china tour
青春痘
青春痘

摆闸
痤疮
痤疮
色斑
色斑
黄褐斑
黄褐斑
青春痘
青春痘
口腔医生
口腔医生
口腔
口腔
口腔医院
口腔医院
口腔科
口腔科
三星集团电话机
呼叫中心
电话交换机
交换机
呼叫中心
测厚仪
测温仪
停车场
道闸

hyangel July 16, 2007 at 10:29 pm

houyuping 07年7月17日

google排名
google排名
wow gold
wow gold
powerleveling
powerleveling
wow gold
wow gold
world of warcraft gold
world of warcraft gold
powerleveling
powerleveling
power leveling
power leveling
wow power leveling
wow power leveling
wow powerleveling
wow powerleveling
world of warcraft powerleveling
world of warcraft powerleveling
world of warcraft power leveling
world of warcraft power leveling
cheap wow powerleveling
cheap wow powerleveling
cheap wow power leveling
cheap wow power leveling

wow powerleveling
wow powerleveling
wow power leveling
wow power leveling
power leveling
power leveling
wow power level
wow power level
Ddo plat
Ddo plat
FFXI Gil
FFXI Gil
GW Gold
GW Gold
GW Power Leveling
GW Power Leveling
RS Gold
RS Gold
RS Power Leveling
RS Power Leveling
Lotro Gold
Lotro Gold
Lotro Power leveling
Lotro Power leveling
翻译公司
翻译公司
上海翻译公司
上海翻译公司
北京翻译公司
北京翻译公司
监控

è´§æž¶
è´§æž¶
è´§æž¶
涂层测厚仪
涂层测厚仪
翻译公司
仓库
仓库
仓库出租
仓库出租
物流园区
物流园区
超声波探伤仪
超声波探伤仪
google排名
门禁
门禁
门禁系统
门禁系统
搬家
搬家公司
北京搬家公司
光盘制作

光盘印刷
光盘印刷
搬家公司
激光打标机
搬家公司
北京搬家公司
hongkong hotel
hongkong hotel
beijing tour
beijing tour
集团电话
集团电话
wow power leveling
wow power leveling
wow powerleveling
wow powerleveling
wow power level
wow power level
china tour
china tour
青春痘
青春痘
摆闸
痤疮
痤疮
色斑
色斑
黄褐斑
黄褐斑
青春痘
青春痘
三星集团电话机
呼叫中心
电话交换机
交换机
呼叫中心
测厚仪
测温仪
停车场
道闸

sent July 17, 2007 at 4:29 am

钢制料箱
钢料箱
料箱生产
置物架
挂板架
置物架
登高车
登高车制造
铁板手推车
手推车
堆垛架制造|
堆垛架
折叠式仓储笼
仓储笼制造
仓储笼
塑木托盘
铁托盘
木托盘
塑料托盘
钢托盘
托盘
角钢货架
中型货架
中型货架
è´§æž¶
工业货架
仓库货架
仓储货架
密集架
立体库货架
汽车货架
移动式货架
滚轮货架
贯通货架
阁楼货架
模具货架
悬臂货架
货架厂
è´§æž¶
重型货架
轻型货架
角钢货架
折叠式料箱
整理架
静音手推车
仓库货架
部队货架
济南货架
巢湖货架
芜湖货架
大连货架
工业货架
郑州货架
天津货架
重庆货架
重庆货架
成都货架
四川货架
云南货架
湖北货架
湖南货架
河北货架
新疆货架
昆明货架
合肥货架
安徽货架
江西货架
佛山货架
中山货架
深圳货架
广东货架公
广州货架
江苏货架
辽宁货架
沈阳货架
山东货架
张家港货架
无锡货架
扬州货架
杭州货架
浙江货架
温州货架
上海货架
北京货架
南京货架
上海货架
绵阳货架
成都货架
日照货架
烟台货架
潍坊货架
东营货架
å¾·å·žè´§æž¶
聊城货架
威海货架
威海货架
常山货架
永嘉货架
é•¿å…´è´§æž¶
松阳货架
德清货架
德清货架
德清货架
龙泉货架
宁海货架
富阳货架
瑞安货架
兰溪货架
永康货架
永康货架
舟山货架
温岭货架
义务货架
丽水货架
金华货架
临海货架
嘉兴货架
æ¹–å·žè´§æž¶
绍兴市货架
宁波货架
温州货架
浙江货架
射阳货架
靖江货架
金湖货架
滨海货架
太仓货架
吴江货架
æ³°å…´è´§æž¶
常熟货架
淮安货架
江阴货架
宜兴货架
张家港货架
昆山货架
南通货架
扬州货架
盐城货架
淮阴货架
连云港货架
镇江货架
常州货架
徐州货架
苏州货架
南京货架
è´§æž¶
货架公司
整理架
折叠式料箱
静音手推车
工业货架
部队货架
济南货架
芜湖货架
巢湖货架
郑州货架
大连货架
天津货架
重庆货架
成都货架
四川货架
云南货架
湖北货架
新疆货架
合肥货架
昆明货架
安徽货架
江西货架
惠州货架
江门货架
东莞货架
佛山货架
中山货架
深圳货架
广东货架
广州货架
江苏货架
辽宁货架
张家港货架
无锡货架
杭州货架
苏州货架
温州货架
上海货架
北京货架
南京货架
上海货架
绵阳货架
成都货架
日照货架
潍坊货架
东营货架
å¾·å·žè´§æž¶
聊城货架
济南货架
青岛货架
山东货架
海宁货架
永嘉货架
é•¿å…´è´§æž¶
松阳货架
德清货架
龙泉货架
宁海货架
富阳货架
瑞安货架
è´§æž¶
è´§æž¶
è´§æž¶
è´§æž¶
仓储货架
仓储货架
仓储货架
货架公司
货架公司
货架公司
货架厂
货架厂
货架厂
南京货架
南京货架
轻型货架
轻型货架
中型货架
中型货架
重型货架
重型货架
托盘
托盘
钢托盘
钢托盘
仓储笼
仓储笼
塑料托盘
仓储笼
钢托盘
南京货架
仓储货架
货架厂
货架公司
仓储笼
南京货架
仓储货架
仓储货架
仓储货架
南京货架
南京货架
南京货架
货架厂
货架厂
货架厂
上海货架
上海货架
上海货架
货架公司
货架公司
货架公司
苏州货架
苏州货架
苏州货架
角钢货架
角钢货架
角钢货架
天津货架
天津货架
天津货架
库房货架
库房货架
库房货架
仓库货架
仓库货架
仓库货架
轻型货架
轻型货架
轻型货架
中型货架
中型货架
中型货架
重型货架
重型货架
重型货架
重型货架
阁楼货架
阁楼货架
阁楼货架
悬臂货架
悬臂货架
悬臂货架
贯通货架
贯通货架
贯通货架
仓储笼
仓储笼
仓储笼
托盘
托盘
托盘
仓储笼
钢托盘
钢托盘
钢托盘
塑料托盘
塑料托盘
轻型货架
中型货架
重型货架
仓储货架
仓储货架
仓储货架
仓储货架
货架公司
货架公司
货架公司
货架公司
货架厂
货架厂
货架厂
货架厂
南京货架
电晕处理机
南通电晕处理机
上海电晕处理机
电晕处理机
南通电晕处理机
上海电晕处理机
南通电晕处理机
上海电晕处理机
电晕处理机
角钢货架
轻型货架
è´§æž¶
南京货架
中型货架
重型货架
贯通货架
通廊货架
模具货架
抽屉货架
移动式货架
密集货架
立体货架
阁楼货架
悬臂货架
滚轮式货架
整理架
托盘
钢托盘
塑料托盘
仓储笼
上海仓储笼
江西仓储笼
料箱
钢制料箱
物流台车
登高车
工具柜
浙江工具柜
工具车
安徽工具车
工作台
整理柜
辊筒输送机
皮带输送机
倍速链条输送机
板式输送机
升降机/移载机
手推车
静音手推车
铁板手推车
搬运车
手动托盘搬运车
液压手动堆垛机
液压手推平台车
圆桶搬运车/油桶搬运车
电动托盘搬运车
高空拣选车
电动/电瓶叉车
江苏运输公司
货运
南京陆路运输
运输公司
货运
货物运输
危险品运输
公路运输
运输
运输公司
运输|货物运输
货运公司
南京搬家公司
南京物流|沈阳物流
乌鲁木齐物流
大连运输公司
天津运输公司
太原运输公司

xdrs July 18, 2007 at 10:53 pm

liying 07年7月19日

google排名
google排名
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
powerleveling
powerleveling
wow power leveling
wow power leveling
wow powerleveling
wow powerleveling
world of warcraft powerleveling
world of warcraft powerleveling
world of warcraft power leveling
world of warcraft power leveling
hongkong hotel
hongkong hotel
beijing tour
beijing tour
翻译公司
翻译公司
上海翻译公司
上海翻译公司
门禁
北京翻译公司
北京翻译公司
google排名

超声波探伤仪
超声波探伤仪
物流园区
物流园区
搬家公司
搬家公司
北京搬家公司
搬家
搬家公司
搬家公司
北京搬家公司
北京搬家公司
beijing
beijing
china tour
china tour
great wall
beijing travel
beijing travel
china tour
china tour
网站设计
多媒体
è´§æž¶
è´§æž¶
è´§æž¶
光盘刻录
光盘刻录
光盘制作
光盘制作
光盘印刷
光盘印刷

摆闸
痤疮
痤疮
色斑
色斑
黄褐斑
黄褐斑
青春痘
青春痘
口腔医生
口腔医生
口腔
口腔
口腔医院
口腔医院
口腔科
口腔科
三星集团电话机
呼叫中心
电话交换机
交换机
呼叫中心
测厚仪
测温仪
停车场
道闸

32rrfrtg July 20, 2007 at 3:39 am

杭州志高空调维修|杭州维修志高空调
杭州志高空调维修|杭州维修志高空调
杭州志高空调维修|杭州维修志高空调
杭州志高空调维修|杭州维修志高空调
杭州志高空调维修|杭州维修志高空调
杭州志高空调维修|杭州维修志高空调
杭州志高空调维修|杭州维修志高空调
杭州志高空调维修|杭州维修志高空调
杭州志高空调维修|杭州维修志高空调
杭州志高空调维修|杭州维修志高空调
杭州志高空调维修|杭州维修志高空调
杭州志高空调维修|杭州维修志高空调
杭州志高空调维修|杭州维修志高空调
杭州志高空调维修|杭州维修志高空调
杭州志高空调维修|杭州维修志高空调
杭州志高空调维修|杭州维修志高空调
杭州志高空调维修|杭州维修志高空调
杭州志高空调维修|杭州维修志高空调
杭州志高空调维修|杭州维修志高空调
杭州志高空调维修|杭州维修志高空调
杭州志高空调维修|杭州维修志高空调
杭州志高空调维修|杭州维修志高空调
杭州志高空调维修|杭州维修志高空调
杭州志高空调维修|杭州维修志高空调

mingxin July 27, 2007 at 2:01 am
è´§æž¶ August 14, 2007 at 9:10 pm



 


塑料托盘


塑料托盘


塑料托盘


塑料托盘


仓储笼



折叠式仓储笼


托盘



钢托盘


钢制托盘


仓库货架


阁楼货架


货架厂


仓储笼




重型货架


仓储货架


重型货架


货架公司


轻型货架


è´§æž¶


堆垛架


仓储笼


折叠式仓储笼


托盘


托盘



塑料托盘



货架 


木托盘



托盘


铁托盘


铁制托盘


托盘


钢托盘


钢制托盘


求购货架


托盘


货架求购


货架制造


贯通货架


è´§æž¶


悬臂货架


仓储笼


托盘


 


阁楼货架


货架厂


重型货架


货架公司


货架厂


中型货架



仓储货架



轻型货架


仓储货架


轻型货架



角钢货架


重型货架


托盘



货架公司



中型货架


货架制造


悬臂货架


塑料托盘


仓储笼



折叠式仓储笼


托盘



钢托盘


钢制托盘


求购货架



货架求购


托盘



货架厂


轻型货架


仓储货架



中型货架


重型货架


仓库货架



阁楼货架


è´§æž¶



悬臂货架


è´§æž¶


钢托盘


仓储笼



模具货架
 托盘

 



托盘


托盘



钢制托盘


塑料托盘


仓储笼



折叠式仓储笼


堆垛架


钢制托盘


仓储笼


模具货架


仓库货架



货架厂


托盘
 钢托盘



货架公司


è´§æž¶


è´§æž¶

è´§æž¶

è´§æž¶


è´§æž¶


è´§æž¶


è´§æž¶


è´§æž¶


è´§æž¶


è´§æž¶


è´§æž¶


è´§æž¶


è´§æž¶



仓储笼


登高车


手推车


塑料托盘


托盘
   


è´§æž¶


托盘



钢托盘


钢制托盘


货架公司



中型货架


仓储笼


托盘


è´§æž¶
 

钢托盘



钢制托盘


货架厂



悬臂货架


仓储货架


托盘




阁楼货架


仓库货架



重型货架


è´§æž¶



轻型货架


è´§æž¶

è´§æž¶

è´§æž¶



轻型货架


è´§æž¶



中型货架


è´§æž¶



重型货架


阁楼货架


仓储笼



悬臂货架


è´§æž¶



模具货架


托盘



塑料托盘


钢制托盘


仓储笼


è´§æž¶


è´§æž¶


仓储货架


货架厂家


托盘


è´§æž¶

è´§æž¶


è´§æž¶
 

货架厂
 


钢制托盘


è´§æž¶



轻型货架


中型货架


重型货架



仓库货架


仓储货架


è´§æž¶


è´§æž¶


è´§æž¶


货架公司


è´§æž¶


è´§æž¶


模具架


中型货架

 


货架公司


è´§æž¶


è´§æž¶


波纹管


补偿器


钢丝绳


波纹管



补偿器

钢丝绳

软管

金属软管

波纹管


补偿器

钢丝绳
钢丝绳
 软管   


软管

金属软管

软管

金属软管

金属软管


软管

金属软管

波纹管


补偿器


补偿器


钢丝绳

波纹管


吊具


吊具设备


收紧器


成套索具


索具


复合钢丝绳吊具


钢丝绳吊具


吊具


无接头钢丝绳


压制钢丝绳



起重链条




链条


安全软梯


护角


软梯


安全网


吊网


钢板起重钳


起重钳



钢板起重吊具


起重吊具


吊钩附件


吊钩


液压工具




电工安全带


安全带


弯管机


扳手


葫芦


千斤顶


升降机


搬动装卸车


吊具



吊具



吊带


柔性吊带


扁平吊带


尼龙吊带


吊装带


柔性吊装带


扁平吊装带


尼龙吊装带


吊索



组合吊索
吊网



软质吊索





栓紧器



紧固器



安全网


安全带


吊网


吊带


柔性吊带



扁平吊带


尼龙吊带


吊装带


柔性吊装带



扁平吊装带
 吊索




尼龙吊装带


组合吊索



链条吊索



软质吊索


栓紧器


紧固器



链条吊索


安全网


安全带

 

 

 

 

 

 

Missliang August 15, 2007 at 3:56 am

houyuping 07年8月15日

wow gold
wow gold
wow power leveling
wow power leveling
wow powerleveling
wow powerleveling
world of warcraft powerleveling
world of warcraft powerleveling
world of warcraft power leveling
world of warcraft power leveling
powerleveling
powerleveling
wow powerleveling
wow powerleveling
wow power leveling
wow power leveling
power leveling
power leveling
wow power level
wow power level
china tour
china tour

翻译公司
翻译公司
上海翻译公司
上海翻译公司
北京翻译公司
北京翻译公司
监控
è´§æž¶
鼓风机
风机
风机
涂层测厚仪
涂层测厚仪
红外测温仪
红外测温仪
超声波测厚仪
超声波测厚仪
超声波探伤仪
超声波探伤仪
频闪仪
频闪仪
涂层测厚仪
涂层测厚仪
电火花检测仪
电火花检测仪

google排名
门禁
门禁
门禁系统
门禁系统
搬家
搬家公司
北京搬家公司
光盘制作
光盘印刷
光盘印刷
搬家公司
激光打标机
搬家公司
北京搬家公司
hongkong hotel
hongkong hotel
beijing tour
beijing tour
集团电话
集团电话
china tour
china tour
青春痘
青春痘

不動産投資 July 18, 2008 at 4:41 am

資金を増やそうとするのに不動産投資をするのが手っ取り早い。日本で不動産で東京 賃貸をさがすのはきわめて難しくシステム開発は日本の会社が良い。

Anonymous October 13, 2008 at 10:27 pm
Eric H January 2, 2011 at 11:47 am

Too bad there’s all of that spam commentary, only the most desperate will ever see this comment.

@washcycle:

A while back, I attended the local Habitat for Humanity annual dinner and learned something related to this discussion. It turns out that they strongly prefer regular donations to large one-time donations. The reason is very simple: they can budget, plan, take out loans, etc. If I donate $50/month (which, by the way, comes to $600 per year and is still (a) large enough to consider in my taxes and (b) enough to qualify me as a “special” donor by your criteria), they can plan on being able to spend that on nails or 2x4s or whatever every month. If I give $600 once per year, it’s a nice windfall that they can use for a one-time purchase, but it doesn’t help the regular execution of any project.

Plus, I’ll bet that my strategy of regular small donations is more likely to be executed than any strategy of one-time large donations, all else being equal. In five years, I might forget, die, be suddenly faced with an unexpected expense (car, medical, plumbing), or change my mind about the charity. Meanwhile, the regular giver committed to the same total has actually given an increasingly large percentage of the same amount. If both givers changed their minds in the fourth year, the regular giver has already given 80% of the total.

And the value of money now is greater than the value of the same amount 5 years from now.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: