The Lady in the Water

by on August 13, 2006 at 7:03 pm in Film | Permalink

It is probably the best movie this summer.  It creates its own world and draws you in.  Forget the bad reviews from writers who do not take obscure Catholic theological debates seriously (well…theology is not my cup of tea either, but I will pretend for the movie’s sake.  If you can accept the Jedi…).  The absurd parts of the film, like the descent of the monkeys, are supposed to be absurd.  It is about the miracle (yes miracle, as in miraculous) of the incarnation, the fact that anyone can be special, our stumbles toward the truth, the apparent arbitrariness of earthly justice, and most of all that we have no choice but to believe in something "absurd."  The strongest connection, of course, is to The Book of Job and then to Lewis’s Narnia.  The film also has a first-rate sense of humor, which is increasingly rare in Hollywood today.

Here is one good (Christian) review.  It is no surprise that the Catholic Kelly Jane Torrance also liked it.  Yet the movie bombed.  It is sad to think that Hollywood is about to neuter one of America’s most accomplished and original filmmakers.

Christopher M August 13, 2006 at 7:54 pm

No, no, no! It was terrible. First, Shyamalan has a tin ear: what the hell is a “narf”? Phonetically it resonates among “Nerf,” “barf,” “smurf,” “narc”…none of which lend any appropriate shades of meaning.

Second, the plot was incoherent. Who were these Blue World creatures? Why did they want to save us? Why were we separated from them? The Tartutic were…who? They’re bad! But they save the day at the end! Huh? What was Story supposed to do to save humanity? Get carried away by a giant eagle?

Every single character other than Giamatti’s was paper-thin. That’s forgivable in a fairy-tale, though. But the bits with the old Chinese lady and her daughter were cliche in too many ways to list.

Shyamalan’s concept of faith is tawdry, saccharine, and cheap, cheap, cheap. Tell you what — we’ll all have this beautiful childlike faith in our own goodness and that of the universe — as soon as magic blue water creatures show up from another world to save us. Who wouldn’t at that point? But until that happens, what on earth do Shyamalan’s little visions have to do with anything?

“Obscure Catholic theological debates” (emphasis added)? Oh, would it were so. I (an atheist) love a little Pelagianism v. Semipelagianism philosophical action. Give me angels dancing on pins until I can’t count anymore. This wasn’t Catholic anything. It was crappy New Age I’m-OK-You’re-OK pseudo-theological tripe.

jeff August 13, 2006 at 9:31 pm

The best thing about M. Night Shamylan is the beautiful pans he inspires. Read this one from Ebert, really one wicked piece of writing:

http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060720/REVIEWS/60720002/1001

(I haven’t seen the movie and probably won’t but not because of Ebert. I quit after Unbreakable but I did like both it and The Sixth Sense.)

asg August 13, 2006 at 9:51 pm

That review is not by Ebert but by his stand-in and blog manager, Jim Emerson.

The Robed One August 14, 2006 at 12:25 am

Wow, I can’t believe you are praising this guy! You have so much better taste than that, Tyler! M Night Shyamalan is exactly what is wrong with Hollywood. He produces cheap, corny crap with really lame religious themes thrown in. Did you see Signs?! It’s painful to watch. Even Unbreakable wasn’t very good. Sixth Sense was clever and not bad, but ever since its success, Shyamalan feels the need to throw some lame “twist” into the ending of his films. I am not going to waste my time or money to see what the twist in this one is.

Chairman Mao August 14, 2006 at 3:08 am

Herr Cowen,

You’re starting to sound like a Marxist.

The film was cheesy and out of touch with reality. Nothing in the movie served as a metaphor that deserves intellectual analysis.

A bizarre fairy tale set in a middle class apartment complex? – NO SOUP FOR YOU!!

Johnny Debacle August 14, 2006 at 7:18 am

The very fact Night inspires such strong positive and negative flack is reason enough to say his films are worthy of being made.

I saw the movie and the first commenter totally misses the mark (as do the critics of Signs, etc). The whole point is that in faith you are asked to make and believe in things that are absolutely ridiculous (evil judgement monkeys, giant eagle rescue) and things that seem illogical and which will not and cannot be explained.

I thought it was good, but certainly not the best film I’ve seen this year. I dont think there has been a legitimate great movie this year, the only one I haven’t seen that seems like it may cross that threshhold is Fearless. Most o f the lauded films have been underwhelming and the summer movies have been summer movies.

And man does he shoot beautifully.

Dan August 14, 2006 at 11:05 am

Tyler, your praise for this terrible film and this hugely overrated egomaniac of a director has undermined my faith in your off-center, contrarian posts. Yikes.

Seriously, are you nuts?

Michael Nardozzi August 14, 2006 at 12:13 pm

The unanswered questions in this movie were deliberately left unanswered. How else were we to suspend our disbelief so completely? I once read a description of Zen Koans that said that they provoked rage in the student. The mind hurls itself against the bars of the cage of logic until at last it gives up and sees that the bars aren’t real. The first commenter is still railing from within his cage.

The characters are one dimensional because they are archetypal. They are meant to convey ideas and to act as symbols. Think Greek Mythology instead of Shakespeare. Unlikely plot devices used simply to transmit an idea are used throughout literature. Does anyone lambast Melville for the sealed, floating coffin used to save Ishmael? A white whale? Preposterous! What of the symbolism though? What else is the author trying to tell us? People…we have to think a little sometimes.

Lastly, I defy any man with a family to remain dry eyed during Giamatti’s scene where he channels his grief in order to save Story. Shyamalan uses this scene, and the porch scene in The Village to portray honest male emotions in a way that is almost entirely absent from modern entertainment. As a father and a husband, Lucius Hunt and Cleveland Heep speak to me in ways that our fathers and uncles should, but often do not.

Anderson August 14, 2006 at 6:08 pm

The whole point is that in faith you are asked to make and believe in things that are absolutely ridiculous (evil judgement monkeys, giant eagle rescue) and things that seem illogical and which will not and cannot be explained.

Hm, then I bet you can’t wait to read my unpublished novel, whose whole point is to make you believe in cheesy dialogue, ridiculous plot twists, and lazy characterization.

Daniel J. D'Amico August 14, 2006 at 6:45 pm

I’m shocked to see anyone defend this film. Personally I thought it was awful, the only defenses I’ve seen of it have been in similar statements supporting the absurdity. I’ll consent this point if it’s a fairy tale it should be judged against other fairy tales. On this margin see the film “Little Otik.” I don’t think it’s fare to call “Lady in Water,” a remotely decent fairy tale after seeing “Little Otik.” Paul Giamatti rules thought.

judson August 15, 2006 at 2:25 pm
andrea August 17, 2006 at 5:43 am

I thought it was a sweet film. Movies don’t have to be dark or clever or sardonic to be enjoyable. It was simple, it didn’t have any twists I noticed, and it drew me into the fantasy. You only wouldn’t have a clue why Story (and the Blue World) was there if you missed the beginning. It’s not the best movie I’ve ever seen, but I enjoyed it. I thought that what cinematic entertainment was for.

maggie August 26, 2006 at 1:11 pm

I just finished the movie. I dont know if i liked it or not. I also just finished the celestine prophesy (a book that attempts to explain sychronicity- or meaningful coincidences in every day life. I found this book coincidently on clearance at a halfprice book store for a dollar. I hadn’t heard of it- but it said “New York Times Best Seller” so I got it. I’d been freaked out because of the coincidences in my life- and this book coincidentally attempted to explain it. I didnt really like the book but….found myself drawn in looking for my own answeres Then another coincedence and then another…blah blah) So after the book I see this. I dont really like the movie but it illustrates perfectly the mind set im in right now. Kind of like the veil of the 4th wall is being lifted. Its a movie that tells us that our world view might be wrong. Maybe we are manifestations of the whole- the collective conciousness and as soon as we learn that this world is our dream and that anything is possible…everything will be possible. My point……

Crazy people like me should not see movie’s like this because it only validates the logic of scitzophrenia (sp) thereby drawing the mentally ill further into their dillusions.

levan September 12, 2006 at 3:38 am
borys October 17, 2006 at 1:27 pm

desire cowgirl azione $ gay berlin $ proposte soggiorno londra $ milano fuoristrada $ delonghi macchina caffe $ bollente strappare mamma $ baseball jerseys $ sistema automazione $ bello dottore $ software gestionale autofficina $ lesbiche e piedi $ pensione albergo ischia $ residence adriatico $ laughable fighette sexldo $ caldo schioccare nubile $ freschissimo timido padre $ taglia forte esibizioniste $ desiderio amatoriali anale fotti $ immagini ragazze italiane con vibratori $ umts cellulare $ felicitous asiatiche anale fotti $ alias season dvd $ seni pelosi $ anzwers nethotpelosissime $ hotel lusso marsiglia $ divertente lesbiche sesso $ cartuccia laser kyocera $ beautiful asiatiche figa fotti $ piastra polipropilene $ milano last minute $ stupefacente lesbiche pompino $ meeting mare $ eros annuncio sicilia $ ps2 sega $ stampante termica epson $ tutto gratis $ congenial fighetta fotti $ britney sex $ natura vacanza toscana $ avventuroso taglia forte $ toscana vacanza affitto $ extreme $ carinissimo asiatiche spogliarello $ case vacanza portogallo $ nicer giovane strip $ residence parma $ piu freddo timido vacche $ grecia turismo $ copenaghen hotel j%c3%b8rgensen $ vergognoso ragazze fotti $ antivirus demo $ shopping online scarpa $ deciso agente di polizia figa fotti $ roma cicogna $ agenzia immobiliare trapani $ adeguato bionde $ senssex lesbiche sexldo $ ristorante espresso $ coy infermiera anale fotti $ strappare giovane ubriache $ lust giovane strip $ affitto ufficio latina $ piedi di donna $ cupido fax $ casino poker $ zucchero filato $ foto carta identita $ stupefacente tedesco ubriache $ derisorio succhiare $ australia vacanza $ vendita appartamento bibione $ figa selvaggia $ capo ragazze merda $ timido amatoriali anale fotti $ sex hardcore movies $ toshiba televisione $

Gko December 22, 2006 at 11:00 am

boys nudi pompini leccate casalinche hard super ditalini video lebiche tettone maialone culoni sudati dowload chiappe schemales donne strapon racconti

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: