Wagering vs. lab introspection

by on February 1, 2007 at 6:32 am in Science | Permalink

Instead of forcing subjects to become aware of their own awareness–in the process perturbing the very phenomenon one wishes to measure–wagering is a more implicit, a more indirect, way to assess awareness.  And, an important practical concern, wagering is more natural, more intuitive, for subjects than introspection.

Most intriguingly, Persaud’s method implies that computing expected gains and choosing the more profitable outcome–that is, placing a bet–has a close and intimate connection to awareness…

That is from Nature Neuroscience, February 2007, gated.  The article is "Betting the House on Consciousness," by Christof Koch and Kerstin Presuschoff.  Another relevant piece from the same issue is "Post-decision wagering objectively measures awareness," by Navindra Persaud, Peter McLeod, and Alan Cowey.

Thanks to Neil H. for the pointer.

mirror February 6, 2007 at 4:53 pm

If you are interested in awareness, I have a suggestion to make do look up Online Shopping for interesting offeres on all awareness books.

jad games February 9, 2010 at 2:14 pm

thank you very much

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: