Ingrid at CT received a query, here are my answers in bold:
1. How has Sen’s thought changed traditional development? We have a better sense of how real income measures don’t estimate capabilities very effectively in some cases, plus we’ve learned how much democracy holds famines at bay. Sen also drew attention to the problem of "the missing women" in the Third World, namely the possibly tendency of families to take better care of sons than daughterse or to selectively abort.
2. How has his thought affected on development frameworks and fields?See #1.
3. How is his thought evaluated? Sen has won a Nobel Prize in economics. His writings have influenced the practice of development economics in the field, plus he had a big impact on "social choice theory," most of all showing how efficiency may conflict with key values of liberty and autonomy ("the Paretian Liberal Paradox")
4. Is Sen’s thought practical and feasible in the development projects? If it is not practical or feasible, what would be the cause? Sen’s measure of capabilities — a kind of positive liberty — can be hard to make operational, but in the field boosting health and literacy first — and real income second — does have more than a theoretical meaning. Try visiting Kerala.
5. If there any shortcoming of Sen’s thought or his theory, what would it be? Sen does not place enough stress on the ability of large-scale commercial institutions or capitalism to elevate people from poverty. He still has some of the socialist biases of the Bengali intelligentsia.
6. Will be it possible for Sen’s thought ( in particular, capability approach) to be accepted and adopted as the main concept in international development in the future? It is already part of the mainstream. But there is no "the main concept" in such a diverse field.
7. Is there any concept or thought which replaces Sen’s thought? Or is there any concept or thought which was affected by Sen’s thought and which has made Sen’s thought more effective? Sen’s work, according to some, has been strengthened by incoporating the philosophical perspectives of Martha Nussbaum. In my view Sen’s thought starts too much with his philosophical opponents (crude economism) and not enough with the poverty problem itself. I’d like to see more analysis of trust and institutions, other than democracy and certain kinds of aid. See also #5. Emily Oster’s work is an important revision to Sen’s claims about the missing women.
I could say more, but I am at a Marriott in Indianapolis. Here is Wikipedia on Sen.















I am glad somebody answered those question. It was bugging me.
Sen’s brilliance shines in every thing he touches. He is, in my opinion, able to go after the big questions in economics and come up with better answers than almost anyone. He should be read, and read carefully. For example, early work on Harrod’s growth theory captures the essential point of Harrod’s model (still an important insight despite its neglect by today’s economists). He also has a relatively early piece on Marx’s labour theory of value which is probably the best in the literature. When he eventually turned his attention to social choice and welfare economics (a literature which tries to rigorously take on the problem of defining the what is “good” for “society”) he makes contribution after contribution.
If you are an economist you know much of his work focuses on the problem of aggregation (an issue which is the Achilles heal of much of economics and which economists often avoid by assuming representative individuals, assuming capital can be treated as a simple homogeneous and easily defined phenomona, assuming that expectations (forecasts of future events) are the same for all, etc.). His contribution in social choice/welfare economics is to identify ways we might be able to get arround the problem of aggregating preferences(Arrow’s theorem) by broadening the information base.
But, IMHO, the most important thing about Sen is that he is a Wayne Gretsky academic (I am a Canadian and a hockey player who was born with seven instead of five senses is a useful point of reference, Tyler might prefer to cite other people with seven senses such as Mozart or Degas, but my real point is that Sen has a brain which works in ways normal human beings can aspire to but never reach). The great thing about being an economist is that questions addressed by economics have attracted many of the the most innately brilliant people in human history and Sen is one of these. Moreover, he has devoted his life to thinking about the problem of creating a better world while simultaneously trying to hold anyone who wants to talk about ” a better world” accountable for their definition of what a better world really means.
Has he found the “holy grail”? No. But anyone searching should read every thing he has written (since it will reveal your errors and help provide direction.) Still his recent popular publications are among the best of his career. He seems to want to make a difference in the real world (i.e beyond the academic world) and, in particular, his work in economic development is practical but not formulaic. Most critics, who are unfamiliar with the way he thinks and of the way his earlier work feeds his pop work, don’t really get it. But an average reader can get a lot.
Read every thing by Sen you can and you will appreciate his pop work to the full. But if you don’t have the tools (mathematics is his languange) read his pop work deeply and you will get some understanding of his points. But alas, there is no simple answer to the basic question (how do we improve the position of the “poor”through concrete policy instruments?) and Sen does not claim to provide one.
Point No.4: As a Keralite, I agree.But I think “capabilities”, “missing women”, “entitlement” etc are only fashinable terms.Of course, Sen’s social choice theory is great.
The octagon,
We Keralites were poor when we opted and elected a communist govt in 1957.There are numerous books on “Kerala Economy” (for example, the one published jointly by the Tilberg University, Netherlands and the Cochin University recently). The stuff about Kerala is not a trick.
speaking as a philosopher I would say that Nussbaum’s changes to Sen’s capabilities approach don’t seem like improvements to me. I don’t find the Aristotelian framework plausible as descriptive view and think it makes it worse as political philosophy and public policy. I don’t think this is a very widely held view but my opinion would be that Sen’s original take was better than Nussbaums’s adaption of it.
I’d thought that the Oster work on missing women hadn’t… held up so well.
GVV,
Enough of your self-promotion. Now please shut up.
Well, I can’t claim to know much about Kerala, I do have experience in the factory floor in Bangadesh. I would say that it is not the “socialist intellectuals” that are holding back the economy, it is a lack of basic industrial and technical skills. I was surprised to find basic tech functions being carried out by Sri Lankans!
GVV,
I am well aware of what is spoken in Kerala, and that the erstwhile Travancore state is only a part of modern Kerala.
That being said, my point was that the institutional history of a state is of primary importance in determining its developmental trajectory. In my opinion, developments in health and literacy are not very sustainable in the absence of the former.
Kerala’s society survives as a cargo cult. It produces little or no net wealth year-on-year, but is sustained by it’s diaspora who travel the rest of India and Persian Gulf/Middle-East as skilled manual labor and clerical / other low-end white-collar work. Kerala is the largest receiver of remittances from it’s diaspora among Indian states.
Of course the Communists caused this! They encouraged indiscriminate demands by unionized agricultural workers to the point that land owners find it profitable to let the land fallow and emigrate in search of jobs. The most fertile agricultural area in India is a net importer of basic foodstuff! The urban trade unions enforce worker “solidarity” with incredible savagery. The political violence of educated but under-employed youth, whose life is subsidized almost entirely by the remittances of their families living far away is legendary in India.
Kerala is *not* some kind of heaven that he makes it out to be. Is the average person educated, healthy and not impoverished? Of course – among the highest standards of life in India. Almost entirely subsidized by external remittances. (Note: NOT TRADE!)
Did some mythical Government investment in “healthcare” and “education” make this happen? Hell no ! The average “liberal” in Kerala, as elsewhere, can afford to hold his/her opinions as free riders on someone else’s money.
花蓮,æ—…éŠç§Ÿè»Š,花蓮旅éŠ,花蓮租車,èŠ±æ±æ—…éŠ,花蓮租車,花蓮租車,花蓮旅éŠ,租車,花蓮旅行社,èŠ±è“®æ—…éŠæ™¯é»ž,花蓮旅éŠè¡Œç¨‹,花蓮旅éŠåœ°åœ–,花蓮一日éŠ,花蓮租車,花蓮租車旅éŠç¶²,花蓮租車,花蓮租車,花蓮租車,èŠ±æ±æ—…éŠæ™¯é»ž,租車,花蓮旅éŠ,èŠ±æ±æ—…éŠè¡Œç¨‹,èŠ±æ±æ—…éŠåœ°åœ–,花蓮租車公å¸,花蓮租車,花蓮旅éŠç§Ÿè»Š,花蓮租車,花蓮旅éŠ,花蓮賞鯨,花蓮旅éŠ,花蓮旅éŠ,租車,花蓮租車,花蓮租車 ,花蓮 租車,花蓮,花蓮旅éŠç¶²,花蓮租車網,花蓮,租車,èŠ±æ± æ—…éŠ,花蓮 租車,花蓮,æ—…éŠ,租車公å¸,花蓮,花蓮旅éŠ,èŠ±æ±æ—…éŠ,花蓮地圖,包車,花蓮,æ—…éŠç§Ÿè»Š,花蓮 租車,租車,花蓮租車資訊網,花蓮旅éŠ,租車,花æ±,花æ±åœ°åœ–,租車公å¸,租車網,花蓮租車旅éŠ,租車,花蓮,賞鯨,花蓮旅éŠç§Ÿè»Š,èŠ±æ±æ—…éŠ,租車網,花蓮海洋公園,租車 ,花蓮 租車,花蓮,花蓮旅éŠ,花蓮租車公å¸,租車花蓮旅éŠ,花蓮租車,花蓮租車公å¸,花蓮一日éŠ,花蓮包車,花蓮租車網,花蓮旅éŠ,花蓮租車,花蓮旅行社,èŠ±æ±æ—…éŠ,花蓮包車,租車,花蓮旅éŠ,花蓮租車,花蓮一日éŠ,租車æœå‹™,花蓮租車公å¸,花蓮包車,花蓮旅éŠ,花蓮租車,花蓮租車公å¸,花蓮一日éŠ,花蓮包車,花蓮租車網,花蓮旅éŠ,花蓮租車,花蓮旅éŠ,花蓮租車,花蓮租車公å¸,花蓮一日éŠ,花蓮租車,租車網,花蓮租車公å¸,花蓮旅éŠ,花蓮旅éŠ,花蓮租車,花蓮租車公å¸,花蓮租車公å¸,花蓮一日éŠ,租車,租車æœå‹™,花蓮旅éŠ,花蓮租車,花蓮租車公å¸,花蓮一日éŠ,花蓮旅éŠ,花蓮賞鯨,花蓮旅éŠ,花蓮租車,花蓮租車公å¸,花蓮一日éŠ,花蓮包車,花蓮租車網,花蓮旅éŠ,花蓮租車,花蓮租車公å¸,花蓮一日éŠ,租車花蓮,花蓮租車,花蓮旅éŠ,花蓮租車,花蓮租車公å¸,花蓮一日éŠ,租車花蓮,花蓮租車,花蓮旅éŠ,花蓮租車,花蓮租車公å¸,花蓮一日éŠ,花蓮包車,花蓮,花蓮旅éŠ,花蓮租車,花蓮租車公å¸,花蓮一日éŠ,花蓮包車,花蓮租車,花蓮旅éŠ,花蓮租車,花蓮租車公å¸,花蓮一日éŠ,花蓮包車,花蓮租車,花蓮旅éŠ,花蓮租車,花蓮租車公å¸,花蓮一日éŠ,花蓮包車,花蓮租車網,租車公å¸,花蓮租車,花蓮租車公å¸,花蓮一日éŠ,花蓮旅éŠ,花蓮旅éŠç§Ÿè»Š,花蓮租車網,花蓮租車,花蓮一日éŠ,租車花蓮,花蓮租車,花蓮旅éŠç§Ÿè»Š,花蓮租車,花蓮租車旅éŠ,花蓮租車,花蓮旅éŠ,花蓮旅éŠ,花蓮包車,花蓮溯溪,花蓮泛舟,花蓮溯溪,花蓮旅éŠ,花蓮旅éŠ,花蓮租車,租車公å¸,花蓮旅éŠç§Ÿè»Š,花蓮租車,租車,花蓮旅éŠ,花蓮租車,èŠ±æ±æ—…éŠ,花蓮賞鯨,花蓮旅éŠ,花蓮泛舟,花蓮賞鯨,花蓮溯溪,花蓮泛舟,花蓮泛舟,花蓮溯溪,花蓮旅éŠ,花蓮旅éŠ,花蓮租車,èŠ±æ±æ—…éŠ,花蓮,花æ±,花蓮旅éŠ,èŠ±æ±æ—…éŠ,花蓮租車,花蓮,花æ±,花蓮旅éŠ,花蓮租車,èŠ±æ±æ—…éŠ,花蓮旅éŠ,花蓮租車,租車,花蓮旅éŠ,花蓮租車,花蓮旅éŠç§Ÿè»Š,花蓮旅éŠ,花蓮租車,花蓮,èŠ±æ±æ—…éŠè¬äº‹é€š,花蓮旅éŠ,租車,花蓮旅éŠ,花蓮租車,花蓮旅éŠ,花蓮租車,花蓮租車,花蓮租車,花蓮旅éŠ,花蓮租車,花蓮旅éŠ,花蓮租車,花蓮旅éŠ,花蓮租車,花蓮旅éŠ,花蓮租車,花蓮租車,花蓮包車,花蓮旅éŠ,花蓮租車,花蓮太é¯é–£,花蓮包車,èŠ±æ±æ—…éŠ,花蓮旅éŠè¡Œç¨‹,花蓮旅éŠ,花蓮 租車,花蓮租車,花蓮租車旅éŠ,花蓮旅éŠç§Ÿè»Š,租車,èŠ±è“®æ—…éŠæŽ¨è–¦,花蓮旅éŠåŒ…車,花蓮租車,花蓮,花蓮租車,花蓮地圖,花蓮旅éŠ,花蓮旅éŠè³‡è¨Šç¶²,èŠ±è“®æ—…éŠæ™¯é»ž,賞鯨,花蓮旅éŠè¡Œç¨‹,花蓮旅éŠ,花蓮旅éŠç§Ÿè»Š,èŠ±æ±æ—…éŠæ™¯é»ž,èŠ±æ±æ—…éŠè¡Œç¨‹,花蓮旅éŠ,花蓮租車,租車,èŠ±æ±æ—…éŠ,花蓮旅éŠ,花蓮租車,花蓮,æ—…éŠé”人,æ—…éŠé”人blog,花蓮租車旅éŠè³‡è¨Šç¶²,花蓮,租車,花蓮,èŠ±æ±æ—…éŠ,地圖,租車,賞鯨泛舟溯溪,租車,[ èŠéº»åº—å®¶ ] 花蓮租車旅éŠè³‡è¨Šç¶²,花蓮租車-行易花蓮旅éŠç§Ÿè»Šè³‡è¨Šç¶² ,æ—…éŠç¶²,æ—…éŠæ™¯é»ž,花蓮行程,花蓮,花æ±,æ—…éŠç§Ÿè»Š,æ—…éŠ,花蓮,租車,èŠ±æ±æ—…éŠ,花蓮租車旅éŠ,è¡Œæ˜“æ—…éŠæ°‘宿資訊網,花蓮,æ—…éŠ,花蓮,一日éŠ,花蓮好玩的地方,花蓮,,一日éŠ,花æ±,租車,æ—…éŠ,花蓮旅éŠ,èŠ±æ±æ—…éŠ,花蓮租車,花蓮租車,花蓮旅éŠ-èŠ±æ±æ—…éŠè¬äº‹é€š
Comments on this entry are closed.