John Ioannidis’s argument that most published research findings are false has been getting some attention in the blogosphere because of a recent article in the WSJ. In an earlier post I explained why most published research findings might be false using a simple diagram.
Hat tip and thanks to Steve Novella at Neurologica Blog and Mark H at Denialism both of whom refer to my analysis adding many excellent insights of their own.
















…lemme venture a guess before I click the link:
most are false for the same reason that nobody cares about a post comment that says: “yep, that’s true,” and adds nothing to the discussion.
You get no dap for saying the same damn thing again.
Now, let’s see if I’m right…
I believe what’s even more disturbing is the tendency we exhibit, discussed in the link below, to turn negative statements into positive statements. That is, given the statement, “X is not true,” studies have shown that, over time and repetition, the “not” fades. http://www.onthemedia.org/transcripts/2007/09/07/04
Just some input from an economist turned architect…
Research based on published data cannot claim much because the data is the result of the hard work of some poor field investigator.
Many studies based on primary data often claim about the robustness of their sampling procedure-but many of them may be based on convenience sampling.
Path breaking papers are those that open the doors of a vast area.
Examples:
The Time Allocation model of Prof.Becker,Prof.Coase’s papers etc.
From your previous post:
There are an infinite number of false hypotheses about the world and only a finite number of true hypotheses so we should expect that most hypotheses are false.
I think there’s some merit to this, but it really depends on how you count hypotheses. And there are some difficult philosophical issues involved there.
For the most obvious way of counting them, there is a one-to-one correspondence between true and false hypotheses: for every true hypothesis, there’s exactly one false one, viz. its logical negation.
However, there’s something to the notion that there are more ways to be wrong than to be right. Consider the question “Who was Jack the Ripper?” If we consider every person who ever lived to be a possible answer to this question, there is one right answer to this question, and billions of wrong ones.
On the other hand, some questions have many more right answers than wrong ones: “Who are three people who have never been in my kitchen?”
Wouldnt then his research findings be false, meaning that most findings are true, meaning his findings were true……. Oh my I have gone and given myself a headache.
Hi Best wishes。Allow me to offer my heartiest wishes.xicao loves-æµæ°´çº¿å¨±ä¹åšå®¢å¸¸å¹´æä¾›é«˜ã€ä¸ã€ä½ŽåŽ‹é”…ç‚‰é’¢ç®¡ã€æµä½“钢管ã€ç»“构钢管ã€åŒ–肥专用钢管ã€çŸ³æ²¹è£‚化钢管ã€åœ°è´¨é’¢ç®¡ã€æ¶²åŽ‹æ”¯æŸ±é’¢ç®¡åŠåˆé‡‘钢管-æ— ç¼ç®¡-æ— ç¼é’¢ç®¡ç‰è®ºæ–‡å‘表资讯/刊物信æ¯ï¼Œå助客户制定论文å‘表方案
hi,I University majoring in the legal profession.After graduation,I 徵信 the work of the strong interest.Has worked in several徵信社.Has a wealth of experience. Now I immigrants France,Hope to continue to engage in the work of徵信 credit.
now,is to wake up every day to drink å’–å•¡, shopping. I hope that early awareness of Boles.
thanks,thank very much.
花蓮旅éŠ,花蓮租車,èŠ±æ±æ—…éŠ,花蓮租車,花蓮租車,花蓮旅éŠ,租車公å¸,花蓮旅行社,èŠ±è“®æ—…éŠæ™¯é»ž,花蓮旅éŠè¡Œç¨‹,花蓮旅éŠåœ°åœ–,花蓮租車資訊,花蓮租車,花蓮租車旅éŠç¶²,花蓮租車,花蓮租車,花蓮租車,èŠ±æ±æ—…éŠæ™¯é»ž,租車,花蓮旅éŠ,èŠ±æ±æ—…éŠè¡Œç¨‹,èŠ±æ±æ—…éŠåœ°åœ–,花蓮租車公å¸,花蓮租車,花蓮旅éŠç§Ÿè»Š,花蓮租車,花蓮旅éŠ,花蓮賞鯨,花蓮旅éŠ,花蓮旅éŠ,租車,花蓮租車,花蓮租車 ,花蓮 租車,花蓮,花蓮旅éŠç¶²,花蓮租車網,花蓮,租車,èŠ±æ± æ—…éŠ,花蓮 租車,花蓮,æ—…éŠ,租車公å¸,花蓮,花蓮旅éŠ,èŠ±æ±æ—…éŠ,花蓮地圖,包車,花蓮,æ—…éŠç§Ÿè»Š,花蓮 租車,租車,花蓮租車資訊網,花蓮 æ—…éŠ,租車,花æ±,花æ±åœ°åœ–,租車公å¸,租車網,花蓮租車旅éŠ,租車,花蓮,賞鯨,花蓮旅éŠç§Ÿè»Š,èŠ±æ±æ—…éŠ,租車網,花蓮海洋公園,租車 ,花蓮 租車,花蓮,花蓮旅éŠ,花蓮租車公å¸,租車花蓮旅éŠ,花蓮租車,花蓮租車公å¸,花蓮一日éŠ,花蓮包車,花蓮租車網,花蓮旅éŠ,花蓮租車,花蓮旅行社,èŠ±æ±æ—…éŠ,花蓮包車,租車,花蓮旅éŠ,花蓮租車,花蓮一日éŠ,租車æœå‹™,花蓮租車公å¸,花蓮包車,花蓮旅éŠ,花蓮租車,花蓮租車公å¸,花蓮一日éŠ,花蓮包車,花蓮租車網,花蓮旅éŠ,花蓮租車,花蓮旅éŠ,花蓮租車,花蓮租車公å¸,花蓮一日éŠ,花蓮租車,租車網,花蓮租車公å¸,花蓮旅éŠ,花蓮旅éŠ,花蓮租車,花蓮租車公å¸,花蓮租車公å¸,花蓮一日éŠ,租車花蓮,租車æœå‹™,花蓮旅éŠ,花蓮租車,花蓮租車公å¸,花蓮一日éŠ,花蓮旅éŠ,花蓮賞鯨,花蓮旅éŠ,花蓮租車,花蓮租車公å¸,花蓮一日éŠ,花蓮包車,花蓮租車網,花蓮旅éŠ,花蓮租車,花蓮租車公å¸,花蓮一日éŠ,租車花蓮,花蓮租車網,花蓮旅éŠ,花蓮租車,花蓮租車公å¸,花蓮一日éŠ,租車花蓮,花蓮租車網,花蓮旅éŠ,花蓮租車,花蓮租車公å¸,花蓮一日éŠ,花蓮包車,花蓮租車網,花蓮旅éŠ,花蓮租車,花蓮租車公å¸,花蓮一日éŠ,花蓮包車,花蓮租車網,花蓮旅éŠ,花蓮租車,花蓮租車公å¸,花蓮一日éŠ,花蓮包車,花蓮租車網,花蓮旅éŠ,花蓮租車,花蓮租車公å¸,花蓮一日éŠ,花蓮包車,花蓮租車網,花蓮旅éŠç§Ÿè»Š,花蓮租車,花蓮租車公å¸,花蓮一日éŠ,花蓮租車網,花蓮旅éŠç§Ÿè»Š,花蓮租車網,花蓮租車,花蓮一日éŠ,租車花蓮,花蓮租車,花蓮旅éŠç§Ÿè»Š,花蓮租車,花蓮租車旅éŠ,花蓮租車,花蓮旅éŠ,花蓮旅éŠ,花蓮包車,花蓮溯溪,花蓮泛舟,花蓮溯溪旅éŠç¶²,花蓮旅éŠ,花蓮民宿,花蓮入å£ç¶²,花蓮民宿黃é ,花蓮旅éŠ,花蓮租車,租車公å¸,花蓮旅éŠç§Ÿè»Š,花蓮租車,租車,花蓮旅éŠ,花蓮租車
花蓮租車公å¸,花蓮旅éŠç§Ÿè»Š,花蓮,租車,花蓮租車公å¸,花蓮旅éŠ,花蓮租車公å¸,行易花蓮租車,租車網,花蓮旅éŠç§Ÿè»Š,花蓮租車,花蓮,花蓮,租車,花蓮 租車,泛舟,花蓮租車,泛舟,花蓮溯溪,花蓮泛舟行程,花蓮溯溪旅éŠ,租車,花蓮一日éŠ,租車,花蓮旅éŠ,花蓮租車網,花蓮租車旅éŠç¶²,花蓮一日éŠ,花蓮租車公å¸,花蓮 æ—…éŠ ç§Ÿè»Š,花蓮 租車,花蓮,花蓮租車網,租車,花蓮 租車,花蓮租車,花蓮美食,花蓮租車,花蓮租車,花蓮租車,花蓮旅éŠ,花蓮租車,花蓮租車,租車,花蓮租車,花蓮租車,花蓮租車,花蓮旅éŠ,花蓮租車,花蓮租車,花蓮 租車,æ—…éŠ,花蓮,租車,花蓮旅éŠ,花蓮,租車,æ—…éŠ,地圖,花æ±,租車
Vibram five fits like a glove covered hand. Shoes give an idea of how to guarantee a fully naked, with adequate protection in the field of security. Each five fingers are independent, Moscow, like a second skin, a real foot, Augloves Au.They very easy, so fans of his bare feet feel a great vibram shoes freedom.
Comments on this entry are closed.