The latest word is here, namely that the previously established relationship between cohabitation and marriage failure seems to have gone away. I hope I have made a few of you happy today.
by Tyler Cowen on March 28, 2008 at 11:26 am in Data Source | Permalink
The latest word is here, namely that the previously established relationship between cohabitation and marriage failure seems to have gone away. I hope I have made a few of you happy today.
Previous post: Andreessen on The Psychology of Human Misjudgment
Next post: Outsourcing, taken to extremes













Get smart with the Thesis WordPress Theme from DIYthemes.
I’ll wager that cohabitation is still correlated with marriage failure for the lower income brackets. (I haven’t read it all, but the study doesn’t contain the word “income,” so I’m pretty sure they haven’t looked at this.)
I wonder if I can get that retainer back…
Yes, this is personally satisfying to me.
It’s confirmation for me. I shacked up with my old lady for a couple years before getting married, and after nearly 8 years I still haven’t thrown her out.
I’d have to say this is a brilliant statement. At one time, I was married and never lived with the person. After 2 years we divorced…it was over after a few months…(it didn’t help that I was gay, either, lol)
I have been living with my current partner for almost 2 years and things are 100% better than they were with the other person.
These days, there is no “learning to love” someome.
I believe this study is flawed. If you incorporate into the equation that the benefits of succesive marriages for failed cohabitors is less than the first marriage (not an unrealistic assumption), and considering that there will be a whole population of failed cohabitors marrying, then the overall benefit for society as a whole not only disappears but decreases through time.
Before: Some people cohabit, they have more marriage failure.
Now: “Everybody” cohabits, marriages following cohabitation are no more likely to fail.
But: Benefits of marriage have declined…i.e. marriage is a failing institution.
Maybe there is still a correlation?
8,
But the likelihood of marriage success is trending up. Marriages are successful at a higher rate now than in decades.
We’ve had exactly the same experience in Ireland. Research I was involved in last year with 700 couples in their first seven years of marriage showed that the majority had co-habited before marrying. Indeed, the proportion previously co-habiting rose sharply among those recently married.
Though a lot of it has to do with changing social values in a nominally Catholic country the main explanation is: house prices. Couples co-habit to share the cost of a house or apartment before incurring the cost of a wedding. More proof that incentives matter?
Well there goes my excuse for putting off marriage.
you don’t have to cohabitate to have children… another act is responsible for that. i’d wager that many legitimate children come from non-cohabitating couples.
Do you really trust a paper that references a study by “Bumpass and Sweet”?
I am commenting on this because Im one of the few old fashioned girls left that dont believe in living together before marriage. Marriage was once something so sacred that many people do not even take seriously anymore. I do not agree with living with someone before you get married to them, but I am not going to be one to judge if that is your choosing. If you’re living with someone then what is the point in getting married? That’s one of the things you have to look forward to after becoming husband and wife! Now a days thought people dont even think twice before they flippantly move in with someone. I know that people say, “Well that’s when you really get to know someone.” This is true, but once you get married you ought to be so in love and willing to work so hard that you’re willing to over look or work through any issues that arise after moving with in with someone. And if you’re not willing to work through the hard things, such as peculiar living habits, then are you really ready to get married to begin with??
I believe that Suzanne was questioning whether the individual was ready for marriage in general. Her premise was that in the institution of marriage, both parties as individuals should be prepared to deal with each other’s peculiar living habits. The question was not whether the two individuals wanted to deal with each other in particular- it was whether each individual had an attitude of willingness to make a marriage, and the sometimes uncomfortable situations of cohabitation in marriage work.
This premise presents marriage as a relationship in which two people are obligated to endure living with each other in all circumstances. (Here I will point out that marriage definitely should never be endured when abuse and neglect are factors.) Except for extreme circumstances, both of the individuals should maintain a mindset of working through their problems and various stressful life situations together.
Comments on this entry are closed.