Summing up the AEAs

by on January 13, 2009 at 7:05 am in Data Source | Permalink

In case you missed the AEAs, Paul Kedrosky created a tag cloud (using Wordle) from the titles of all 505 papers.  Paul is a little surprised that Keynes and crisis are not more prominent – don't worry just wait till next year!

Papers_2
  

1 babar January 13, 2009 at 7:17 am

please make “evidence” larger — i am not sure that it is big enough for researchers to see it.

2 David Heigham January 13, 2009 at 10:16 am

Wow! ‘Evidence’ out front and ‘Effects’ not far behind. This is a revolution in the profession. Is it possible that some economiists are becoming scientific?

3 an economist January 13, 2009 at 12:10 pm

I can attest that at least one session on the crisis packed one of the largest available rooms to overflowing. People were standing in the hall straining to hear.

4 paul johnson January 13, 2009 at 6:22 pm

And he points out that ‘Keynes’ appears exactly ZERO times. How the world has turned.

5 Ricardo January 14, 2009 at 2:00 am

I’m surprised “endogenous” or “endogeneity” didn’t make the cut — or if they did they are too small to identify. You can’t half-sleep through a typical empirical econ seminar these days without hearing these words thrown about. “Identify” and “identification” are also popular.

6 jad jar February 10, 2010 at 7:45 pm

thank you for this information.sis jarMy local telecom is a monopoly, and it is out-of-control as far as wiretapping, eavesdropping, hacking, controling e-mail programs, phishing, spoof websites, etc.
No company should be immune from law suits and especially companies that control our communications.To give telecoms immunity will make “big brother”free nokia 6600 games“In this incidence and extent of formal coauthorship observed in economics against that observed in biology and discuss the causes and consequences of formal coauthorship in both disciplines. We then investigate the economic value (to authors) of informal comments offered by colleagues. This investigation leads us naturally into a discussion of the degree to which formal collaboration through coauthorship serves as a substitute for informal collaboration through collegial commentary. Data on manuscript submissions to the Journal of PolzticalEconomy permit us to shed additional empirical light on this subject. Finally, we demonstrate that while the incidence and extent of formal intellectual collaboration through coauthorship are greater in biology than in economics, the incidence and extent of informal intellectual collaboration are greater in economics than in biology. This leads us to search for evidence (which we find) of quids pro quo offered by authors to suppliers of free nokia n70 games

7 louis vuitton September 24, 2010 at 8:37 pm

Wow! ‘Evidence’ out front and ‘Effects’ not far behind. This is a revolution in the profession. Is it possible that some economiists are becoming scientific?

8 erotik shop December 3, 2010 at 10:43 am

there is an underlying logic and understanding that also means a better understanding of the artists and their time and what made their work important.

9 Hermes Handbag December 14, 2010 at 9:24 pm

I was looking out the window. I was waiting for the plane to take off. I was wearing Monster Cable’s Beats by Dr. Dre Studio headphones . I was listening to Pens’ burning, fuzzed-out, 27-minute onslaught, Hey Friend, What You Doing? I was shouting with sudden shock and pain.

“Ow! What?”

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: