Obama collected a total of $130,000 from AIG in 2008, while McCain accepted a total of $59,499.
by Alex Tabarrok on March 18, 2009 at 2:48 pm in Current Affairs | Permalink
Previous post: The culture that is French, a continuing series
Next post: Markets in everything













Get smart with the Thesis WordPress Theme from DIYthemes.
Looks like AIG bet on the wrong horse …
Neal, obviously AIG bet on the right horse. Obama did win, after all. The remaining question is, if the donations were a good use of the money.
Cheap dates.
Grant,
Please send me $130,000. I accept cash or certified check.
Thank you,
Bob
“If the bonuses are pennies on the megadollar, is this pennies on the pennies? $130,000? Is this a serious comment?”
In the context of all this “outrage,” why not?
Peanuts. You would have to total up the contributions of the employees and officers if you want a realistic measure.
Lest we forget: this was the same Senator Obama (expressing his outrage as President only hours ago) who also used to champion “campaign finance reform”– but that was before he (shamelessly) renounced his former position of abiding by Federal campaign finance limits for his general election campaign. If Obama only adopts positions in order to abandon them–or as in this case, in order to express his moral indignation from the Oval Office–what kind of intellectual honesty and integrity can he legitimately claim?
Does anybody know what the total amount of funds donated to politicians by AIG was last year, would be interesting to compare. I think this might have been a drop in the bucket compared to all of the money donated to politicians.
I used to work at AIG in the 90s. At that time Hank Greenberg was interested in expanding in China. I worked on the corporate intranet and was tasked with creating a page to “educate” employees on “actions they could voluntarily undertake” to encourage their members of Congress “to improve the Chinese-American business climate.” We even made a corporate video in which Hank laid it on the line.
What the public is just hearing about now has been the culture at AIG for at least 12 years.
“So, I gather no one is an individual and everyone is merely a shill for their employer?”
This comment wins the thread. This story is typical of the abysmal standards for campaign-finance reporting. Reporters consistently conflate contributions from employees to contributions from the company. This is why the “giving on both sides of the aisle” trope has always been overblown–in an organization as large as AIG, of course some employees will support Democrats and others will support Republicans.
As long as we’re complaining about millions of dollars being paid out from taxpayer-subsidized entities, why not the hundreds of millions paid to baseball, football, and basketball players who are living off of the rents provided by stadiums paid for by taxpayers?
Obama should give the money he received back to AIG and keep his job.
AIG employees should keep the money they received from AIG and resign from AIG.
“As long as we’re complaining about millions of dollars being paid out from taxpayer-subsidized entities, why not the hundreds of millions paid to baseball, football, and basketball players who are living off of the rents provided by stadiums paid for by taxpayers?”
The city makes money off of these stadiums, these stadiums are not just used by the football teams. I live in Tampa, and we subsidized the Buccaneer’s Stadium,. There are concerts/ college football games/ monster truck shows/ political rallies at this stadium besides just pro-football teams.
ä¸å›½å…¬æ–‡ç½‘ ä¸å›½çš®è‚¤ç½‘ ä¸å›½å‘¼å¸ç½‘ 肿瘤网 癌症康å¤ç½‘ 工作总结 个人工作总结 åŠå¹´å·¥ä½œæ€»ç»“ 年终工作总结 å•ä½å·¥ä½œæ€»ç»“ 教师工作总结 æ•™å¦å·¥ä½œæ€»ç»“ 妿 ¡å·¥ä½œæ€»ç»“ 德育工作总结 财务工作总结 医务工作总结 安全工作总结 乡镇工作总结 党员工作总结 团委工作总结 å…¬å¸å·¥ä½œæ€»ç»“ å®žä¹ å·¥ä½œæ€»ç»“ ç主任工作总结 党支部工作总结 办公室工作总结 å¦ç”Ÿä¼šå·¥ä½œæ€»ç»“ 工作报告 政府报告 è¿°èŒæŠ¥å‘Š è¿°èŒè¿°å»‰ 考察报告 自查报告 情况报告 è°ƒç ”æŠ¥å‘Š 调查报告 申请报告 è¾žèŒæŠ¥å‘Š å®žä¹ æŠ¥å‘Š 验收报告 评估报告 工作汇报 æ€æƒ³æ±‡æŠ¥ æ±‡æŠ¥ææ–™ 情况通报 情况汇报 心得体会 å¦ä¹ 体会 工作体会 培è®ä½“会 è¯»åŽæ„Ÿ é¢†å¯¼è®²è¯ åº†å…¸è‡´è¾ž 节日致辞 开业开幕 演讲稿 ç«žè˜æ¼”讲 å°±èŒæ¼”讲 比赛演讲 徿–‡æ¼”讲 节日演讲 演讲技巧 工作æ„è§ æ´»åŠ¨ç–划 工作方案 整改方案 实施方案 ä¼åˆ’文案 è¥é”€æ–¹æ¡ˆ åŸ¹è®æ–¹æ¡ˆ 应急预案 è§„ç« åˆ¶åº¦ 法律法规 äº‹è¿¹ææ–™ 先进事迹 个人事迹 ç”³æŠ¥ææ–™ å¦ä¹ ææ–™ è€ƒå¯Ÿææ–™ ç»éªŒææ–™ äº¤æµææ–™ 自我鉴定 工作计划 工作规划 年度工作计划 妿 ¡å·¥ä½œè®¡åˆ’ 个人工作计划 团委工作计划 工会工作计划 å•ä½å·¥ä½œè®¡åˆ’ 党支部工作计划 民主生活会 入党志愿书 入党申请书 入团申请书 转æ£ç”³è¯·ä¹¦ å…šæ€§åˆ†æžææ–™ 先教活动 整改措施 å‰–æžææ–™ 公告通知 模æ¿èŒƒä¾‹ è´ºç”µè´ºè¯ å¸¸ç”¨ä¹¦ä¿¡ åˆåŒèŒƒæœ¬ 社交礼仪 法律文书 论文
Oh come on, if voters were smarter they would have FEWER not MORE problems with the salaries of professional athletes. The average person thinks that players are intrinsically overpaid (better to have billionaire owners keep the money) and that ticket prices are driven by player salaries (and not supply and demand).
Money well spent, it appears.
If you want to see how AIG donated, http://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/summary.php?id=D000000123
Interesting to see that they gave as much to Dodd as Obama.
Comments on this entry are closed.