Sunday assorted links

by on July 16, 2017 at 12:26 pm in Uncategorized | Permalink

1 Anonymous July 16, 2017 at 12:55 pm

It has been mentioned before, but the Mission Burrito was invented surprisingly far north, but come to think of it, “Mission” does refer to a Spanish Mission and early food fusion.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mission_burrito

The article is interesting enough, but “city” data is kind of poor for comparison. I mean, East Los Angeles is not part of the City. It is an unicorporated part of the County.

Tacos and Burritos are equally available in my part of Orange County. San Juan Capistrano is the nearest mission, and a good neighborhood for either.

2 Anonymous July 16, 2017 at 12:57 pm

I feel like these studies should use population centers and population gradients, disregarding political boundaries.

3 Dick the Butcher July 16, 2017 at 1:09 pm

16 July 1769, Saint Junipero Serra founded the first Roman Catholic Mission is Alta California: San Diego de Alacala.

Santiago y Cierra.

There is no accounting for taste. I prefer burritos.

4 Anonymous July 16, 2017 at 1:48 pm

Right, because tacos and burritos are uniform goods.

(Sometimes I want a wet chicken burrito with two sauces, and sometimes I want a mess of al pastor street tacos. Or about 200 other variations.)

5 Thomas July 16, 2017 at 4:17 pm

“Or about 200 other variations”

Oh, wow, you have impressively expansive tastes. Your familiarity with taco varieties surely signifies how well-traveled and cosmopolitan you are. Really, very impressive. Bravo.

6 Anonymous July 16, 2017 at 4:26 pm

Tacos, as a culinary framework, are a nonrival good.

Feel free to invent and enjoy variation 201.

I don’t suppose Thomas gets as animated about 200 sandwiches, but here they are:

http://www.ocweekly.com/restaurants/ikes-place-is-a-bay-area-sandwich-chain-that-has-quickly-impressed-oc-8051376

7 msgkings July 17, 2017 at 11:20 am

Again, Thomas, do you expect this guy to read your post and go “hmm, I don’t really like taco variety, I’m just signaling. I should just eat at Taco Bell from now on”? Or is this just your way of letting the rest of us anonymous pixels know that you sure don’t like people who like to try and enjoy different kinds of food?

8 Anonymous July 16, 2017 at 1:06 pm

The Senate healthcare bills all seem good for no one’s health. Period. End of sentence.

They might be passed in spite (literally?) of that, but I would think the political rebound would come pretty fast. So why even?

9 Dick the Butcher July 16, 2017 at 1:25 pm

How so? Explain with facts and figures how my health will be affected.

The GOP won the Congress (added 62 House and 10 Senate seats) and the White House by promising to repeal ACA. Each year, Obama vetoed a GOP repeal of ACA. The GOP has won each and every special Congressional in 2017. They had better pass a repeal light or you guys win. .

Your “no one’s” recalls The Odyssey (Book IX?) wherein Odysseus told the Cyclops, Polyphemus, his name is “No Man.” Is there nothing of value Homer can’t contribute? The cannibalistic Cyclops metaphor is apt for dirt-bag, stupid hypocrites, e.g., the left.

10 Thomas Taylor July 16, 2017 at 1:32 pm

“Each year, Obama vetoed a GOP repeal of ACA.”
I thought there was something about replacing. Is this it? Can the replacement be judged by voters or is it the God Market’s reveaked Truth?

11 Thomas July 16, 2017 at 4:19 pm

Wherein a socialist cannot distinguish a market from a mandate.

12 Thomas Taylor July 16, 2017 at 4:47 pm

Really? I thought Republicans would vote a market solution for healthcare because markets, markets, markets…

13 Thomas Taylor July 16, 2017 at 1:32 pm

“Each year, Obama vetoed a GOP repeal of ACA.”
I thought there was something about replacing. Is this it? Can the replacement be judged by voters or is it the God Market’s revealed Truth?

14 Dick July 16, 2017 at 2:01 pm

Don’t bogart that joint, my friend. Pass it over to me.

15 Thomas Taylor July 16, 2017 at 2:24 pm

That is, as one of the involved confessed, the repealing thing was not serious and there was no replacement planned (after 8 years!). Republicans always counted on the adult at the White House vettoing their irresponsible decision. Well, it is 2017 now, the adult is gone and Republicans can not dodge the blame anymore.

16 Moo cow July 16, 2017 at 3:18 pm

I don’t recall it making it to his desk more than once.

17 Borjigid July 17, 2017 at 11:37 am

Surely no bill even made it past the Senate? I think Dick is misremembering.

18 Anonymous July 16, 2017 at 1:42 pm

Should not the positive proof for improvement be on the designers, or backers, of a “health care” bill?

But for what it’s worth, I think we are now at doctors oppose, nurses oppose, patient groups oppose, insurers oppose, actuaries oppose, and hospitals oppose.

I hardly need to make an independent case when all those line up on one side. I have n fact, I would be foolish to do so.

https://twitter.com/TopherSpiro/status/886015376173268992

19 Dick July 16, 2017 at 1:59 pm

You got nothing.

20 Anonymous July 16, 2017 at 2:03 pm

I forgot the CBO, and the tragic comedy of “ignore the CBO!”

“Governors skeptical after ‘pretty atrocious’ session with top Trump health officials”

http://www.cnn.com/2017/07/15/politics/trump-health-care-governors/index.html

21 Thomas July 16, 2017 at 4:22 pm

CBO: 23 million will no longer have health insurance, 17 million of which will do so by choice after government repeals punishment for lack of health insurance.

NPR: 23 million will lose health insurance.

Why can’t the DNC pay for its own media?

22 Thomas July 16, 2017 at 4:20 pm

“The beneficiaries of government spending oppose reducing government spending. Checkmate!”

23 Thomas July 16, 2017 at 4:17 pm

“So why even?”

Why, even? I can’t.

24 Thiago Ribeiro July 16, 2017 at 1:09 pm

2. Is yours a taco city or a burrito city?
Arab food and the best of the world. Most people who visit praise the food and the music.

25 Falstaff July 16, 2017 at 2:54 pm

Better than Brazilian?!

26 Thiago Ribeiro July 16, 2017 at 4:45 pm

Better than the Arab food of anyncountry and better than most food int he World. A few Brazilian typical dishes (farofa, angu, caldo verde, Brazilian puree) can beat it.

27 Careless July 16, 2017 at 3:23 pm

the data for #2 doesn’t make sense. There are 235 Mexican restaurants including Taco Bell, Chipotle, etc in Chicago, but 225 excluding them? … no

28 Careless July 16, 2017 at 3:25 pm

there are at least 15 Chipotles alone in Chicago

29 Anonymous July 16, 2017 at 1:44 pm

The thing on China and WeChat was very good. I would use QR codes, what exactly is blocking them here?

30 Anonymous July 16, 2017 at 2:30 pm
31 Stormy Dragon July 16, 2017 at 2:10 pm

EPCOT was my favorite part of Disney World growing. Lots of cool tech based stuff in Tomorrow Land and a chance to experience other nation’s cuisine and cultures.

Of course, that’s exactly what makes it unpopular. Not the age, but the fact that middle America lives in terror that they might have to spend a moment thinking about something or stepping a few inches out of their comfort zone.

32 Thiago Ribeiro July 16, 2017 at 2:25 pm

It is sad.

33 We live in interesting times July 16, 2017 at 10:57 pm

What they need Is a new pavilion or 2. They have a spot that would be perfect for the Taj Mahal or St. Basil’s.

34 vinny July 16, 2017 at 2:10 pm

#2 is interesting but skewed. Many places in Arizona call them “burros.”

35 CMOT July 16, 2017 at 10:20 pm

It’s really, really, really simple, and the data in the cited article bears this out: tacos are for those at, going to, or coming from work. Burritos are for drunks.

36 Belle Époque July 16, 2017 at 2:57 pm

Neither burritos nor tacos are preferable to hunger.

37 Anonymous July 16, 2017 at 3:33 pm
38 Belle Époque July 16, 2017 at 3:36 pm

Did you use the tin foil your burrito came wrapped in to make your hat?

39 Anonymous July 16, 2017 at 3:51 pm

Yeah, yeah. That will make it all go away.

https://twitter.com/justinhendrix/status/886195110056263680

40 Belle Époque July 16, 2017 at 4:45 pm

How can something nonexistent go away?

41 Anonymous July 16, 2017 at 4:50 pm

I have a link for that too!

https://twitter.com/peterdaou/status/886559734198923264

Perfect straight man, where do I send the check?

42 Belle Époque July 16, 2017 at 7:29 pm

Unwittingly apt analogy… belief in the Russian conspiracy is belief in the purple lizard.

43 Anonymous July 16, 2017 at 8:10 pm

How incredibly cleaver, straight man. Post no links. Cycle dull insistence.

How about a link direct to the public intelligence report?

https://www.scribd.com/document/335885580/Unclassified-version-of-intelligence-report-on-Russian-hacking-during-the-2016-election

We got that.

44 Belle Époque July 16, 2017 at 11:44 pm

That report is being bandied about as vindiciation for Team Trump. Not sure why you’re posting it.

You’re zero for four in understanding the content of your own links. Very “cleaver” to be sure.

45 Anonymous July 17, 2017 at 10:24 am

Why would that be good news for Trump or nation? As it stands now we have a very small air gap between Team Trump and Russian crimes. Team Trump met with the Russians, lied tons about it, claims that was it. At essentially the same Russia launches a cyberwar targeting our election with the full range of hacks, from direct incursion to social engineering.

There is no good news in that, and a spelling error doesn’t really “Trump” it.

46 Anonymous July 17, 2017 at 2:07 pm
47 Borjigid July 17, 2017 at 11:39 am

+1 legit sick burn

48 Anonymous July 17, 2017 at 12:31 pm

Is it?

Rolf Mowatt-Larssen is the director of the Intelligence and Defense Project at Harvard’s Belfer Center. He served as director of intelligence and counterintelligence at the Department of Energy 2005 to 2008 and as chief of the CIA’s European Division 2004 to 2005 as part of a 23-year career in the CIA.

Listening to that guy is tinfoil hat? And dodging his observations is .. normal?

Maybe I am too much on the autistic spectrum, and that makes me too serious about such testimony, and too unwilling to .. ride the purple lizard of social belief.

49 Thomas July 16, 2017 at 4:24 pm

Anon, did you hear about Trump eating KFC with a fork and knife? Impeachment imminent.

50 Anonymous July 16, 2017 at 4:27 pm

Deep breaths Thomas, deep breaths.

51 Clay July 16, 2017 at 4:09 pm

Burritos/burrito bowls seem to be a fit for the general American market right now. They’re huge, can be assembled in assembly line format, don’t rely much on tortilla quality, and the size accommodates just about any combination of fillings one can think of.

With tacos, however, you aren’t dumping the whole meal into one bite, so you’ve got to get a combination of a couple flavors right, and a bad tortilla is apt to blow the whole thing.

52 Roy LC July 16, 2017 at 5:17 pm

Who eats a burrito at a Mexican restaurant?

Street food is one thing, but in a lot of places, generally the better ones at that, even tacos are often a minority item on the menu. And what about Indian tacos?

Now enchiladas…

53 Albert July 16, 2017 at 5:45 pm

I pretty much always get enchiladas at Mexican restaurants. I don’t care what kind of enchilada, that just always seems like the best value IMHO.

54 Chance July 16, 2017 at 6:29 pm

2. The data set is pretty suspect. San Francisco went from 115 to 108 Mexican eateries when chains were removed. However, a very cursory look reveals SF has 13 Chipotles and 7 Taco Bells. I guess if the error is persistent from city to city it doesn’t matter, but as an SF resident I knew I’d seen more than 7 chain Mexican places here.

55 o. nate July 16, 2017 at 8:58 pm

Also, the assumption that any place that’s not a chain is an “authentic” Mexican restaurant seems rather optimistic.

56 Floccina July 16, 2017 at 8:31 pm

#3 seems like a small move in the right direction. The states regulate health care but are somewhat shielded by the federal government, so the incentives are a bit off.

57 Dave Barnes July 16, 2017 at 9:26 pm

Does Tex-Mex count as Mexican.

I say no.

Denver has about 3 Mexican restaurants. The rest are all Tex-Mex (modified by Colorado) sloppy.

58 rpenm July 17, 2017 at 8:44 pm

Las Tortas was excellent, last time I came through.

59 dux.ie July 16, 2017 at 9:34 pm
60 dux.ie July 16, 2017 at 9:48 pm
61 Greg July 17, 2017 at 12:48 am

This data for Los Angeles can’t be right. There’s probably 153 Mexican restaurants on sunset blvd from the beach into ceasar Chavez blvd alone.

62 msgkings July 17, 2017 at 2:26 am

Off topic(s) but it did come from the Sunday NYT magazine. If seeing the letters ‘NYT’ scares you, it’s nonpolitical and very interesting:

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/13/magazine/letter-of-recommendation-detroit-techno.html

63 back on topic July 17, 2017 at 2:40 am

I prefer music music to house music or techno music. Though I understand why some people don’t.

64 msgkings July 17, 2017 at 11:27 am

I do too, but the origins of techno are interesting to me, especially as people think it’s Euro music when really it came from middle America.

65 Jeffrey Deutsch July 17, 2017 at 6:24 am

#4: I don’t suppose any of the paintings included two people named George?

66 Butler T. Reynolds July 17, 2017 at 9:45 am

#2 – a) I seem to remember an excerpt from Michener’s Centennial where a man from Atlanta is visiting Colorado in the 1970s. If I remember correctly, he is told by his host that what he’s eating is called a “burrito”. The Atlanta man says that they don’t see that in Georgia. Stuff changes.

b) I’m always wary of how meaningful it is to read lists like this. I kept wondering if the numbers included just the city limits or the entire metro area. Atlanta, for example, contains only about 8% of the metro Atlanta population. I see two near Atlanta suburbs in the lists of smaller cities: Marietta and Roswell. Oftentimes various lists do not indicate what area they’re talking about. Unless it is something related specifically to a city government, city-only statistics are meaningless. Most people experience life in a metro area.

67 Hazel Meade July 17, 2017 at 10:09 am

#2. I used to be a burrito person, but since I have been trying to eat fewer simple carbs, I switched to tacos. Burritos usually are packed with a lot of rice and beans, while tacos are mostly meat. Consequently, I find that tacos focus more heavily on the flavor of the meat, which takes more talent to prepare, while a burrito covers the taste of the meat with fillings. There are quite a few BBQ/Tacqueria joints sprouting up lately – where the tacos are filled with pulled pork or smoked brisket and so forth, which really highlights this difference. From a culinary standpoint, tacos are a more sophisticated art.

68 John Dougan July 17, 2017 at 9:18 pm

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: