Assorted links


The compression story buried the lede - in blind testing compressed files were preferred to uncompressed .wav files. Also, the more highly compressed files were preferred to the less highly compressed files.


Not quite right. In blind testing essentially everything above a certain minimum bit rate (higher needed for mp3s than for newer compression schemes) was indistinguishable. Sometimes the higher bit rate or uncompressed files scored better, sometimes worse.

Even "uncompressed" files aren't really perfect, since there's still a sample rate. At high enough bit rates of compression, the errors introduced by compression are small enough compared to other sources of error anyway.

3. Someone posted that here I think a couple years ago. Maybe Barkley Rosser.

Re #4, 3m libor exceeded the two year treasury rate by over 100 basis points for two weeks in December 2008, without the world coming to an end.

I'm not entirely surprised about mp3/wma/wav thing. This type of data compression can add some "crunchiness" to the songs that some find pleasing (to use the words of Radiohead's Jonny Greenwood.) I didn't see it mentioned in the article but this type of compression shelves significant quantities of higher frequency sound - this means the listener may be focusing more on the sound that "matters", that is the mid-range. (see: If I'm right, it's a bit of a slap in the face of hi-fi nuts who spend 1,000$ on power cables and such in order to squeeze their beloved ultrasonic frequencies (not that audiophile theory is on terra firma in the first place.)

mp3 has an option for variable bit rates, where the compression is contingent upon the data at the moment - if the algorithm judges that more bits are needed ATM it will compress less, and vise versa (wma may but I never use it so I dunno.) I wonder how this would have performed? On one hand it may have a higher overall bit rate, but you can also hear the effects of the compression fluctuating - I find it un-listenable sometimes, incredibly distracting.

They also didn't check ogg vorbis, which is supposed to sound better than mp3 (and doesn't require the same licensing mp3 does.)

I read Moxham's fine book a while ago. The hedge has disappeared to such an extent that thousands, indeed tens of thousands, living right where it used to be have no idea about it. And yet it was enormous and impenetrable.

What makes a T shirt from juicy couture so special, you would ask? Well, the answer is fairly simple. Juicy couture is special because it takes a few points into consideration and skillfully fulfils their needs in order to please and satisfy its customers with ease.
it allows you to make a choice by offering an array of items to choose from. In this scenario, the items are various kinds of Juicy couture Jewelry. The range here is rather wide and thus the choice is by no means limited. You have various kinds of designs and styles. Some of them like sterling princess T shirt are so unique that you feel and look quite different and stylish while wearing them.
the color combinations here are rich and vibrant and anyone who hops around to have a closer look has a wide choice. With blues, black, yellows, you never run out of combinations here. You can go forJuicy Couture Bikini that suit your wardrobe, different designs to go with different suits or outfits, choice is yours.
the Juicy Couture T Shirts is made from the finest materials known to man and is therefore durable in nature. With so many reasons to back, a T shirts from Juicy Couture has all one needs to make a lasting difference.
What's more it is even easier to shop forJuicy Couture T Shirts. You can browse through the internet and find too many online stores.

The audio compression article is BEGGING for some p tests or at least standard deviations. Just painful to read.

People are missing the point of using high bitrates, or no compression at all:

Artifacts are cumulative. And compression algorithms choke on the artifacts of previous compression algorithms.

Take a 128kb mp3, convert it to a lossless wave file, then to a 128kb ogg.

Take a 320kb mp3, convert it to a lossless wave file, then to a 128kb ogg.

Even if a 320kb mp3 and 128kb mp3 provide negligible sound difference, when you do the conversion, the source with the fewer artifacts sounds better.

On the science biz, the most stimulating note I've ever read is Bruce Charlton's.

You'll see that he suggests that "the science selection process ruthlessly weeds-out interesting and imaginative people". I wonder where such people go now? Not, present company excepted, into Economics, I suspect.

Comments for this post are closed