Assorted links

Comments

4. I suspect that benefit is from price discrimination rather than helping "level out inventory" per the article.

Another reason is to tap the strong urge in most consumers of not missing out on a deal. People who may not otherwise buy that last beer probably will when it is advertised as a momentary steal.

The idea isn't novel though. I remember "State Street Brats" in Madison, WI used to have a weekly "Beer Stock Exchange" night a couple of years ago. Think they stopped it because the ran foul of the city alcohol commission.The University complained that the scheme encouraged binge drinking. So far as I could tell, the gimmick did attract the drinking hordes, but then again that's just Wisconsin.

In any case shouldn't it lead to a more efficient price-discovery mechanism than regular pricing?

4) that's stupid. if someone at the bar hasn't order a certain type of drink, why would you encourage them to order it?

If you're on a role making 30 martinis, why the hell would you encourage someone to order a mojito?

Gimmick.

"Gimmick."

You realize this is a bar right?

2. Not going to win.

3. I am absolutely shocked. BTW - over at Econtalk Russ Roberts has an interview with Richard Burkhauser who has a few criticisms of P&S.

Ignoring government redistribution and non-wage income makes income inequality look worse. So what do we do to combat it? Raise taxes (thus shifting more income away from wages) and redistribute more. Then when we do the same dumb incomplete measurment again, income inequality looks even worse than before trying to combat it.

Re; Daniel Marcin

Oh goody. Another inexperienced ideologue, this one not brandishing not a Phd, but the pursuit of one, along with his righteous indignation as the principal qualifications to "protect the environment", and direct other's lives according to his sensibilities.

Sounds like a zealot guided primarily by watching to many episodes of "captain planet" as a kid and remaining in that state of maturity.

He needs to grow up before representing grownups.

It's funny that the guy on #2 thinks he is somehow unique. I mean, next thing you know he will be teaching a class in Harvard about Obama.

Oh wait, someone else is already doing it...

http://www.newsmax.com/US/harvard-class-understanding-obama/2012/04/11/id/435591

#2. There are so many sloppy statements on this guys blog, I wonder if he really is a PhD student in economics. First, credits do not have to be dollar for dollar matches. In fact, most are not. (The child care tax credit and the "older" education credits are examples.) Also, where railing about congress' pay, he quotes nominal pay for congress then switches references the real pay of the typical person. Much else is stupid on his blog as well.

Greenyshade is right.

#3 The French article only shows ineptitude of its authors signed below. With economists like these, France is the next Greece.

The variable bar pricing scheme has been implented many times over the years. First time I myself came across the model was in a bar in Paris appropriately called 'La Bourse' in 2005. As an added bonus, instead of the typical Happy Hour concept, there would be a random 'Market Crash' late in the afternoon where all the drink's price would fall off to their minimum price levels. Highly entertaining

#3: So?

The inequality people have convinced me that there is inequality, but not that it is a bad thing. It seems like a natural byproduct of globalization: it is easier than ever to transmit the best ideas to the rest of the world. If you can make 1 dollar a billion times, that's a lot of money (see: Facebook).

Re #2: "I’m also a trustee on the board of the Huron Valley Central Labor Council, AFL-CIO"

I stopped reading when I saw that an econ PhD. student _in Michigan_ is a trustee on the board of the AFL-CIO.

#2 PhD student running for congress or doing *anything* else = he'll never finish the dissertation . . .

Re: 3. Piketty and Saez. They have received a lot of favorable press, but I doubt that their work is universally approved by other economists. Can you point us toward any knowledgeable critiques of Piketty and Saez by economists?

Comments for this post are closed