Tuesday assorted links

Comments

4. There is nothing more annoying than a mildly funny (at best) person who thinks he's hilarious.

Except maybe the FAA. But yeah, that was pretty bad.

Beware jokes of the form "Look: academics have a sense of humor, too!"

Comments for this post are closed

I would feel a lot better if I knew the FAA was joking.

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

Don't tell NPR.

Comments for this post are closed

I represent that remark

Comments for this post are closed

I dislike humor in music. Go figure.

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

2. jammed rudders = death

engine failure is survivable

Comments for this post are closed

I eagerly await the 11 best economics papers produced by Subway sandwich artists.

Comments for this post are closed

#5: what, shouldn't this be in #4?

Furthermore, if #5 is in the realm of study for NBER, what would be beyond their scope?

Plus, the closing line of the summary is a real cliffhanger: "at least one physical characteristic commonly associated with physical attraction influences the formation, functioning, and stability of longer-term relationships."

What "one trick" is the secret to better relationships? Five dollars to the NBER and you too can find out!!!

Classic!

Comments for this post are closed

Just guessing, I'd say the nose. I find many otherwise attractive women have a nose I just can't get past. Especially the Jewish nose both large and with that hump in the middle, but there are many very similarly unattractive noses among Germans, French, and Italians. Lots of English too, presumably due to interbreeding following the Norman conquest or perhaps much earlier with the Romans.

With regard to height, I'm curious whether the full paper discloses the height of the authors. If they're short people, well of course they would follow a line of reasoning that leads to their putative conclusions. Short people are that way.

http://fuckyeahbignoses.tumblr.com/

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

Pretty sure they mean height. That is, this paper demonstrates at least one; there may be others, but only height was studied.

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

Short people do have a reason to live. :-)

Classy. Hate & bigotry masquerading as a joke.

I think Pinto expects us to be familiar with:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1NvgLkuEtkA
Which is not as funny as I Love L.A, you're right.

David Pinto, you hateful bigot. I hate you!!

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

5'3" bro checking in.

I know who you are! I can't believe you'd post here!

Comments for this post are closed

So was my mom and dad...and I'm 6'1". Dad's side extremely malnourished growing up - so he should have been taller under normal circumstances - and mom's side had relatively tall males.

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

McCulloch, J Huston, 1985. "On Heteros*edasticity," Econometrica 53(2), 403.

pretty dry, but good insider humor. Here's the start:

“The most pressing issue in econometric orthography today is whether heteros*edasticity should be spelled with a k or with a c.”

Comments for this post are closed

Numero Uno: The FAA, like every government agency, wants to control everything it can, including in this case every cubic centimeter of the atmosphere above the ground, without its role being completely defined.

Comments for this post are closed

4. Funny economists? Do they compete with Jewish baseball players? The supply far exceeds the demand and equilibrium is therefore impossible.

Comments for this post are closed

5. Government employees enjoy free access to NBER papers; private-sector schmucks who pay their salaries do not.

Comments for this post are closed

2. Where was the crash? They had an emergency and handled it successfully.

Nor did the article say much at all about "what it was like."

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

I'm 6'4" but I think all the female prejudice in favor of tall men is out of date. It used to be a sign a man had had adequate nurture when young, which is a good thing to look for in a mate. But now height is mostly nature, and having the genes for being tall are a mixed bag at best.

No, it's not out of date at all. Attractive women will only date men who are a few inches taller than them, and boy are the 5-foot-6 men pissed off about that.

I think Steve means the logic behind the prejudice is out of date, not the prejudice itself.

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

Hollywood is less heightist than it used to be. Golden Age leading men averaged probably a couple of standard deviations above the mean (Wayne, Stewart, Cooper, Grant, etc.). Now, with the rest of the population getting taller, it's probably more like one standard deviation.

But the biggest stars now are smallish dudes, Cruise, Wahlberg, Hardy, etc. Pitt, Clooney, Damon are average. Affleck and others a tad above. Is height good in the room but short good on screen? Drama kids selected out of sports? Coincidence?

Just guessing, but I think it's easier for short people to have a proportionally muscular figure. I'm not aware of any reason for a relationship between height and muscular cross-section in trained individuals. Scale a five-foot man and six-foot man to the same apparent height, and the short one should look bulkier.

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

#3 ¨I was much influenced by Charles Murray’s “Coming Apart” How can someone who sees the American people like this get an important policy making decisions in any administration let alone one that claims to support working class causes.

I "support" my kids by helping them do things better. Sometimes I give them money. But my kid's big problem is not a lack of resources.

Comments for this post are closed

So...fifty years of anti-poverty policy based on the idea that the poor's biggest problem is that they just haven't been handed enough free money! How's that working out? The poverty rate must be practically negative by now.

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

#5. Athletes tend to be taller than average, and also tend to have a high divorce rate. Could that skew the numbers just a bit?

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed