Polar bears are taking over the south Pacific

by on February 14, 2006 at 8:18 am in Television | Permalink

These days I am up for another TV show, so I tried Lost.  The plane crashes between LA and Sydney, and before episode one is over they have encountered a polar bear (sound familiar?).  So far I like it.  Real rates of return appear to be negative, a virtual prerequisite for good tragedy.  Next on my list is 24, but it will take a few months for me to get there.

In the meantime, suggest another topic for blogging.  Three separate mentions are required for the topic, and again I rule out the libelous, the obscene, and the physically impossible.  Mulch I already have covered.  I will return to the topic of "advice" (thank you for the kind words), so no need to mention that either.  Comments, of course, are open.

Addendum: Here are more Cheney jokes, do follow the link to the WSJ page.

Second addendum: Ladies and gentleman, "exercise" is the winner but I will take ideas from further suggestions in the comments, so keep on adding topics if you wish.

floydthebarber February 14, 2006 at 8:18 am

suggested topic: trends and forecasts of body art and body modification in modern Western society.

HC February 14, 2006 at 8:27 am

An economist explains why, how, and how much to exercise.

A Tykhyy February 14, 2006 at 8:28 am

suggested topic: Spanish civil war (also mentioned several times in the previous take)

watching biathalon February 14, 2006 at 8:31 am

topic: the oeuvre of britney spears

Sarah February 14, 2006 at 8:34 am

Video games

John P. February 14, 2006 at 8:49 am

Suggested topic: Why are opera fans mostly old people?

mc February 14, 2006 at 8:52 am

Reliability, capacity, accuracy–choosing between the revolver and the auto pistol (e.g.–Glock) as a personal protection sidearm.

ostap February 14, 2006 at 8:58 am

Why are Russians’ souls so mysterious?

Josh February 14, 2006 at 9:04 am

Reliability, capacity, accuracy–choosing between the revolver and the auto pistol (e.g.–Glock) as a personal protection sidearm.

Matthew Cromer February 14, 2006 at 9:20 am

I’ll second a discussion of epistemology

Timothy February 14, 2006 at 9:25 am

I’ll cast my vote for exercise.

John B. Chilton February 14, 2006 at 9:36 am

In India the woman’s family pays the man to marry her. Lots. So much so that there is female infanticide.

In the United Arab Emirates it’s the other way around. Again, we’re talking big bucks here. So much so that many women never get married because their families won’t accept a “low price” for them.

Why?

DAA February 14, 2006 at 9:48 am

Why is botteled water more expensive than botteled soft drinks?

Diego February 14, 2006 at 9:49 am

Spanish civil war

eddie February 14, 2006 at 10:14 am

Guns or Drugs. Thus making a third for “choosing between the revolver and the auto pistol”. Alas, looks like “exercise” beat us to the checkered flag.

Re 24: my wife and I have greatly enjoyed seasons 1, 3, and 5 (so far). We were horribly disappointed with seasons 2 and 4. Explaining why we continued watching season 4 week after week would be an interesting exercise in behavioral economics. Imagine a weekly appointment with a masseuse who simply poked at you for an hour with wooden spoons. “That was awful!” “See you next week?” “Yeah, sure, I guess so…”

Sarah February 14, 2006 at 10:20 am

OH! Facebook. That’s a great one. Can I change mine to facebook?

Kathleen Fasanella February 14, 2006 at 10:25 am

You write about art and food, why not architecture and apparel?

bh February 14, 2006 at 10:34 am

Yes, I’ll second the architecture and apparel. Especially the apparel. What makes a great fashion show? How do the winners of Project Runway actually get chosen? lots of the designers I like don’t get picked. why is my taste so bad and Heidi Klum’s so sophisticated? What made Isaac Mizrahi so famous? other designers? New designs tend to be based on older designs. Coverage of fashion week highlighted how many items looked like they were from the 80s. Why is there less creativity in such a creative field?

Tom February 14, 2006 at 10:45 am

I’d like to fourth (I think) exercise.

josh February 14, 2006 at 11:01 am

The Spanish Civil War.

Looking at how the war played out on the soccer field would be interesting too.

John P. February 14, 2006 at 11:07 am

bh — re how the winners on Project Runway are chosen: Make sure you read the fine print that flashes on the screen at the end of each episode. It discloses that the producers have a say in who gets chosen and cut.

Josh February 14, 2006 at 11:18 am

Conflict Diamonds: Considering the structure of the diamond market, is it feasible to establish and enforce an effective classification system that would eliminate or severely reduce the presence of conflict diamonds in legitimate consumer markets?

Zac February 14, 2006 at 11:46 am

I think my video game vote should carry over from the last group of votes. That means video games is the true winner; I demand a recount!

Ant Evans February 14, 2006 at 12:45 pm

eBay eats GDP: Welfare effects of peer-to-peer selling of second-hand stuff and the implications for traditional welfare and activity measures. Sorry if this has been discussed ad nauseam before, but a local search for eBay brought up so many hits, I couldn’t tell.

bob montgomery February 14, 2006 at 12:56 pm

I’ll add a vote for video games, as well as a vote for professional sports in general. I’m somewhat interested because the Sonics (my home NBA team) are currently trying to extort a better stadium out of Seattle. Plus, MLB is also trying to do the same to D.C., so it should have some local interest.

Huggy February 14, 2006 at 1:18 pm

Cheney jokes are pretty lame. Can comics start trying to be funny again instead of making political points?

Johan Richter February 14, 2006 at 2:37 pm

Most overrated classic litteray work.

Neema February 14, 2006 at 3:17 pm

video games

As for 24, it’s crack on television. Make sure you know what you’re getting into when you decide to watch it.

Bond investor February 14, 2006 at 5:46 pm

Tyler, I strongly endorse keeping up with “Lost.” There’s a reason it’s won awards as best TV drama. While they focus mostly on character drama and some science fiction, you may find some of the episodes interesting in an economic sense. E.g.:

* how does a group of strangers divvy up a food cache fairly?
* what is the best location for a settlement: to be near food or near water?
* does public or private policing/firearms use increase safety or increase accidents (or both)?

http://www.oceanic-air.com is a fun “Lost”-created site relating to the plane crash, with hidden clues.

Rob February 14, 2006 at 8:50 pm

I want to read you blog about any correlation between marriage rates, obesity rates and rates of attractiveness, particulary across countries, and concerning any rural v. urban dynamic. I think about my time in Europe, where the women are generally thinner, more attractive, and I think less likely to be married or to have married at a young age vs. rural Maine, where I’m from, where women marry young and tend to be larger.

I get the feeling that marriage provides a disincentive to stay attractive. I’m interested in knowing what you guys think and whether there is any scholarship on the subject.

JW Tan February 15, 2006 at 5:53 am

I second John B Chilton’s suggestion on the direction of dowry payments.

Anonymous October 14, 2008 at 12:42 am

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: