Jason Furman is a very good CEA pick in my view

by on May 28, 2013 at 4:12 pm in Current Affairs, Economics | Permalink

That’s all.

Addendum: Here is commentary from Ezra Klein, and more here.  I will add simply that Jason cannot help but think analytically about economics.

Dismalist May 28, 2013 at 4:35 pm

The second Klein comment makes Furman very sympathetic to me. That Mankiw is positive is confirmatory.

mw May 28, 2013 at 9:32 pm

Surprisingly, you don’t hear much from the “simplify government” economists about merging NEC and CEA.

MikeDC May 28, 2013 at 11:13 pm

I doubt he can be as completely ignored and unappreciated as Romer was. But then again, Romer is a probably as close to to a legitimate economic genius as there is, while Furman just seems like a smart guy. Thus, even when Furman ends up being just as ignored as Romer was, it will still have been a greater foolishness to have ignored Romer.

morrissey May 29, 2013 at 12:50 am

He has a picture of Liberace on his wall, and that’s all you need to know about him.

プラダ トート June 19, 2013 at 5:07 am

绉併伅鎰忓織绉併伅銇ㄣ仐銇 RSS銉曘偅銉笺儔RSS | 銇傘仾銇焮鐩淬仭銇仚銇愩伀} 銇с亶銇亜 |瑕嬨仱銇戙倠|銈掕銇ゃ亼銈嬨亾銇ㄣ伀闆诲瓙銉°兗銉偟銉栥偣銈儶銉椼偡銉с兂 銉忋偆銉戙兗銉兂銈瘆銇俱仧銇瘂銉嬨儱銉笺偣銉偪銉紎 E銉嬨儱銉笺偣銈点兗銉撱偣} 銇傘仾銇熴伄銉°兗銉偄銉夈儸銈广倰妞滅储銇椼伨銇欍€傘亜銇氥倢銇嬨倰銇嬶紵銈点儢銈广偗銉┿偆銉栥仐銇俱仚銆佺銇瘂| | 5鏈堛仹銇椼仧銇犮亼銇嬨倐銇椼倢} | 銇熼爢銇仾銈嬨倛銇嗐伀绉亄|瑾嶈瓨|鐞嗚В| |瑾嶈瓨鐭モ€嬧€嬨倠銈掑疅鐝緘 {| |瑷卞彲let銇岃ū銇檥 | {瑕垏銇仐銇︺亸銇犮仌銇剗銇傘倞銇屻仺銇嗐仈銇栥亜銇俱仚銆?

ブルガリ 新作 June 19, 2013 at 5:07 am

F * CKIN ‘鐩銇俱仐銇剕椹氥亸 鍟忛銇撱亾銆?绉併伅绉亅绉併伅闈炲父銇珄婧€瓒硘瀣夈仐銇剕骞搞仜} 銉濄偣銉堣浜媫銇傘仾銇熴倰銆?銇濄倱銇伀 鎺ヨЕ銈拀銇珅 鎺с亪銉曘偐銉兗銉墋 銆傘亗銇仧銇瘂銇忋仩銇曘亜|瑕垏}銇俱仚闆诲瓙銉°兗銉儭銉笺儷绉併倰钀姐仺銇欙紵

激安 バーバリー June 19, 2013 at 5:20 am

銇с亶銈嬨仩銇慖 {鐧鸿|妞滃嚭|瑕虫脯|鐧鸿|姘椼仴銇剗銇撱伄{銈点偆銉坾銈︺偋銉栥偟銈ゃ儓|銈ゃ兂銈裤兗銉嶃儍銉堛偟銈ゃ儓|銈点偆銉坿銆佺銇郊銈夈仺銇剾銇竴閮ㄣ倰鍏辨湁銇欍倠銇撱仺銇畆eddit銇銇嶃伨銇椼仧銆?

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: