by Tyler Cowen
on March 18, 2014 at 5:55 pm
in Law, Medicine |
At present, no more than about 200 young people start using crack-cocaine each day. Ten years ago, the corresponding estimated daily rate was 1,000.
That is from this paper, via Kevin Lewis.
Probably due to the availability of more substitutes today.
harsher laws, bad economy, increase cost
You don’t think all those were about the same 10 years ago?
Has the cost really increased? I don’t have latest data but from 1990 through 2008 cocaine prices seem to have fallen to ~half.
+1: substitutes = cheap amphetamines
Proliferation of meth = less kids using crack.
I personally wonder whether the obvious lies regarding marijuana take away from the message that crack cocaine and methamphetamines can legitimately wreak havoc on proper functioning of the brain.
My general feeling is that drug use by teenagers has been falling across the board:
Powdered cocaine, methamphetamine and MDMA purity is at historic highs. Plus you have an endless array of pharma-grade research chemicals sold openly on the Internet. They’re being synthesized at a way faster rate than drug bureaucracies can schedule them. Crack’s a drug that most users don’t even like, but simply use because alternatives are too low-quality to produce a rush.
Yep. I was in GNC a few years back and a couple of bean poles were scouring the pre-workout supplements. One of them asked me if I knew which one had the most DMAA. I had to laugh. They did not look too bright, but the Internet makes it easy enough I guess. Not long after DMAA was banned.
Perhaps people learn?
Not many constants in social science, but one such constant is that the proportion of self-destructive people in a culture (given an average level of creativity, with respect to other cultures) is generally the same over the generations. The instrumentalities of self-destruction are fungible, as alluded to in this post. (The proportion may be seen as a reciprocal – one over five, one over six, is my guess – of the number of relatively normal people who opt for long-term instrumentalities of happiness – with a few negative trends during wars, political and social revolutions, plagues and famines, and with rare positive trends during those times which are called revivals (such as occurred under the good kings of Israel such as Asa and Josiah, or during the modern ages in a few countries within – mostly barely within – living memory…)
com’on now — yet another totally worthless fact-challenged research “study” ??
what is the scientific definition of “young people” ?
obscure, self-reported data from some Crack addicts cannot possibly be reliable in drawing broad objective conclusions, especially by some distant guy sitting in a cubicle with a PC crunching 5th-hand “reports” on cocaine use.
Meanwhile heroin overdoses are rising quickly, coming on the heels of years of increases in prescription drug abuse.
After recognizing the dangers of prescription pain killers, I think some doctors are becoming more hesitant to prescribe.
My general assumption is that heroin users are often looking for a strong pain killer and are not so interested in the “rush”.
There may be a connection here.
Why is crack cocaine a category. It’s just cocaine packaged for a easy sale and super fast effect. It would be one thing to talk about cocaine and then break things down to smokers, sniffers and shooters, but the obsession with crack cocaine reeks of ideology.
For all intents and purposes though, no one is smoking pure freebase cocaine, so I think you’re making a distinction without a real difference here. Basically the only cocaine being smoked IS crack cocaine, and for all intents and purposes the only way people take crack cocaine is smoking it.
There is enough of a difference in context that it’s meaningful, I think. I’ve done cocaine 15-20 times, most recently once every couple years or thereabouts (Shit’s bad for you, kids – you’re not missing that much and if you feel there’s any chance you’d fall addicted to it stay away for sure.) Some pattern like this has been not too uncommon in my social circles. But I’ve never met anyone (beyond random street crackheads, I guess) who has smoked crack. I’ve never had the opportunity to buy crack. Drug dealer I knew used to actually make crack, but only as a step in removing some impurity and he turned it back into powder. This man fell for the needle but even once he was on that he talked about how smoking crack was over the line for him. Separate worlds, even if the cook is pretty simple.
Ya man, I’m curious, but figure I’m too prone to addiction to go near anything beyond the “harmless” ranking of “1″ on the UN scale, which makes weed and magic mushrooms perfectly legit in my distorted interpretation whereby “probably harmless” is interpreted as “harmless”
Anyone who touches the stuff tells me the same thing. It’s not all it’s cracked up to be, so stick with the green.
*Insert joke about immigrants using up all the crack cocaine, robots automating away crack cocaine usage, or price floors blocking out young people*
The CIA had its hands full torturing people. We can’t expect them to be in all places at all times.
Is this why I cannot find a good, cheap crack-whore anymore?
You should be looking for an “espresso-whore” nowadays…
It’s all about the oxy/opiate/heroin or meth, depending on locale.
Just imagine the crack and meth usage rates in a high school where “the” renowned pothead and weed facilitator widely decries the evils of crack, meth and other hard drugs. Practically a service to society, if you ask me Well, those were the days.
Comments on this entry are closed.
Previous post: Tesla versus the Rent Seekers
Next post: The economics of South Ossetia
Email Tyler Cowen
Follow Tyler on Twitter
Email Alex Tabarrok
Follow Alex on Twitter
Subscribe in a reader
Follow Us on Twitter
Marginal Revolution on Twitter Counter.com
Get smart with the Thesis WordPress Theme from DIYthemes.