Selection bias

Who shows up for experiments?

Peer nominations of pathological personality traits were collected on
1442 freshmen participating in a study regarding personality and 283
students who initially provided consent to participate but failed to
show up for the assessment.  Ten peer-based personality disorder scales
and eight IIP-64 scales were entered into two separate multiple
logistic regression procedures to predict the probability of
nonparticipation.  There was a significantly higher probability of
participation if peers nominated someone as having more histrionic,
obsessive–compulsive, self-sacrificing, and intrusive/needy
characteristics.  Students were significantly less likely to participate
if peers nominated them as being higher on narcissism or
non-assertiveness.  Results suggest it may be more difficult to obtain
sufficient numbers of people high in narcissistic traits than
individuals with other personality traits.  Researchers may need to
employ novel strategies to recruit individuals with narcissistic traits
for experimental studies.

By the way, I’ve never showed up for any experiments.  I would think the procedure also discriminates against the anti-social, a trait which may be to some extent correlated with narcissism.

The link is from BPS Digest, which also informs us that people born in late winter are smarter; I can only imagine how smart tall, left-handed people, born in late winter [alas, I am not tall], must be…


Comments for this post are closed