Why do women like cads?

A loyal MR reader asks:

Explore the economics of the Tom Leykis model of human behavior: under a surprisingly broad set of conditions, women are more attracted to men who treat them poorly, don’t spend money on them, etc., while nice guys finish last.

Here is a very early MR post on that topic, and anotherAmber offers salacious commentary.  I’ll add that a lot of the so-called nice guys aren’t actually nicer than average, once you get past the surface.

41 in a series of 50.

Comments

Your last point is often overlooked but hugely important. Very often the "nice guy" who complains about losing out under these circumstances is a whiny type with a sense of entitlement, whose self-image as an aggrieved nice guy crowds out his ability to make a real emotional connection.

(Of course, I don't mean this as anything personal against the reader who raised the question, about whom I know nothing. I'm only describing a frequent archetype.)

Agreed with Tom T. and the last line of TC. Nice guys are often (not always, but often) no less interested in getting laid than cads, and even no more inclined to long-term pair-bonding.

They've just been egregiously misinformed, thanks to political correctness and female-marketed mass culture, about what women actually want and will actually respond to (as opposed to what they say they want and say they will respond to).

cf. Neil Strauss's book, "The Game"

I remember many girls in the 80s were attracted to _any_ guy that drove a Firebird w/ "T-Tops". ;-)

Agree that "nice guys" frequently aren't, in fact many of them are scarily misogynistic once you get to know them, and total assholes if they actually do get a girlfriend.

Very, very amusing.

I will also point out that the "nice guy" stereotype has many deficiencies. Another factor to consider is confidence. I would argue to be a "bad boy" you have to be confident in what you want and how you live your life. While living dangerously and the desire to change/mother the "bad boy" certainly are factors, I think confidence is factor often overlooked. There a plenty of genuine nice guys who have no problems with women because of the confidence factor. The so called "nice guy" seems to me to be more of a p*ssy then actual nice guy. I will also echo the "scarily misogynistic" attribute (probably stems from years of rejection because they are cowards and feel entitled; yes I am dealing with generalizations.) I will also say that BW has a point as well. This was an interesting post to say the least.

Regards,
TDL

Another thought:

Thanks to birth control, cad-hood (male promiscuity), while still fun for many, is no longer a very effective strategy for spreading male genes (at least, not in countries like the U.S. where birth control is common). Extramarital affairs and casual premarital sex are no longer likely to result in conception.

This means that most children are now children of "dads".

Does this mean that "cad" genes will be slowly shoved out of the gene pool by the Pill?

In this cliche, "nice guys" most certainly refeers to "wussy guys with no confidence." One of the key components to a man sparking attraction within a woman is her relative precieved value to the man's. A wussy, "nice guy," will finish last because he indicates that he respects the woman more than himself. This destroys attraction on a hard-wired level. Think about it in an evolutionary sense-- why would a woman mate with a man weaker than herself?

under a surprisingly broad set of conditions, women are more attracted to men who treat them poorly

This is misogynistic nerd folklore. Women are not, in fact, attracted to men who "treat them poorly" anymore than men are attracted to women who treat them poorly.

Research from social psychology and evolutionary psychology show women are attracted by the personality trait dominance (leadership), and both men and women are attracted by the personality trait agreeableness. (the opposite of jerkyness)

Some women look for short term sexual partners; these women do not choose men that "treat them poorly", but male partners that - surprise! - are also looking for short term sexual partners.

In general women tend to like confidence, healthy physiques, money, power, ambition, and well socialized extroverts. However, among that general framework, women are largely idiosyncratic and unpredictable in their preferences and can almost never accurately articulate what they want until they see it.

Women also put a huge emphasis on natural and convenient meeting conditions which gives bartenders, yoga teachers, and anyone in a classroom type environment large advantages.

Overall, women have erratic, confusing, and often intentionally misleading mate selection criteria and that can frustrate men to no end. However, no one likes hearing the losers complain about it regardless of whether the situation is fair or not.

As a former "nice guy," I can attest that we were placed under the impression that we were to never, ever express sexual interest in a girl directly to her, as that was "creepy," "wrong," and "perverted."

Well, I think that impression is natural for guys with little sexual experience. I mean, before you have sex with a few women, you don't really know they'll like it. So trying to get them in bed seems a little like trying to take something from them...until you do it a few times, and realize they like it too. :-)

But as for macho guys who slap girls' asses or whatever, well maybe that crap works in high school, but those guys learn pretty quick to cut it out if they intend to get laid past age 18...except in Japan, where company drinking excursions to "hostess bars" allow men to maintain ass-slapping jerkitude into their 50s...but that is a story for another day. ;-)

As a former "nice guy," I can attest that we were placed under the impression that we were to never, ever express sexual interest in a girl directly to her, as that was "creepy," "wrong," and "perverted."

Um, it *is* creepy, wrong, and perverted ... if and only if the woman doesn't like you in the first place. See: literally every sexual harassment lawsuit or harassment arrest.

That creates a problem for the risk-averse, you see.

Self proclaimed "nice guys" are pathetic twerps who lost, whine loudly, are full of excuses, and play the blame game rather than suck it up and take ownership of the challenge.

And cads would do exactly the same thing had they "lost".

Still doesn't get us anywhere in terms of the mystery.

I think a better question than "why do women like cads?" is why do women like fat guys with lower IQ's than they have? If instead of viewing a guy as fat you view him as big, you might be able to explain that in terms of perceived security. On the IQ question, the best answer I can come up with from talking to women is that it's a control issue. Or perhaps it's just due to the fact that male IQs tend to be more widely distributed about the mean that female IQs.

Or perhaps since most men are fatter and/or have a lower IQ than I do makes my conclusions erroneous and the question pointless.

shy guys finish last.

There... fixed.

In our circle of friends, most of the girls are ga-ga for any sort of normal guy who exhibits the following traits:

1. Isn't shy.
2. Doesn't pursue everything in a skirt.
3. Isn't a jerk.
4. Isn't poor to the point of being nearly homeless.
5. and - this can't really be bargained with too much - isn't more than 15 pounds overweight.

Ugly is almost always something that, as a guy, you can address. What is attractive to a woman, in terms of a guys face or even style (to a lessor degree), I think is very subjective. Just be in decent shape with a little bit of color to your skin and wear modern attire - and you'll catch the eye of many women. How willing they are to date you or sleep with you probably depends on the 5 factors listed above.

Not that I'm any expert, but that's what I've learned about what women want. It varies slightly from woman to woman, and some demand more, but I think for most girls, this is a decent starting out point.

Oh... and to stay on subject, having said all that if they can't find someone who fits all 5 criteria, most will just find someone who fits #1 and #5.

Why?

I think it's probably because for most women, attention and self-perception are their two most biggest needs. So being with a good looking guy who shows her attention, even negative attention, address those needs.

Women are not, in fact, attracted to men who "treat them poorly" anymore than men are attracted to women who treat them poorly.

Both populations are significantly non-zero, even among people looking for (or in) long-term relationships.

5. and - this can't really be bargained with too much - isn't more than 15 pounds overweight.

Utterly untrue. It might be accurate to say that women aren't usually attracted to men significantly more overweight than themselves, but I'm not even sure of that. Overweight offsets some level of confidence, etc., but hugely fat, hugely confident guys don't have much trouble getting women, just skinny women. For a woman who isn't model-sized, statement 5 might begin to be accurate at 50 lbs, not 15.

Could it be the feeling of danger triggering more dopamine into a woman's brain?

The answer is simple in its premise, but complex in its execution:

Power.

The same impulse that kept Hussein in power in Iraq... no matter how much of a jerk he is to you, he's keeping the wolf from the door. I believe the phrase is:"Better the devil you know..."

Once again biology trumps rational thought - the biggest, toughest caveman gets the best girls because he can protect the females and the offspring he has with those females from other males. Just go "Google" the mating habits of lions if you want to know more about how that works...

"Cognito ergo sum" my rear end; I have yet to see any "cognito" that wasn't related to biology in some way.

That's my 2 cents...

This video explains it all:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2143915578134513037&q=sexual+harassment

Ouch, Tyler cast aspersions on my nice guy credentials. Is this the type of cadish behavior I should emulate? I have already followed his other advice to take control of my romantic destiny.

They say that men and women do not turn up at speed-dating events hoping to meet a certain "type" but judge each potential partner relative to others at the event. Thus, a man of average height will find that he makes a big impression with the women if his male rivals are all short.

Malloy's link is for a study done with a small population of people doing speed dating in the UK. The general drift, at least for the rendition presented there, is that in a speed dating situation one gets evaluated more relative to the competition in the room than on an some absolute scale.

While interesting, it's just not relevant to this post -- this is one of those times where an absolute value is more useful in making an assessment than a relative value.

I dunno what a cad is but I've been that nice guy and I am now a CAD!! Out of the shear need to get laid on a somewhat regular basis, I have learned to talk to women, make small talk and I've gotten to the point where I can talk a pastor out of her panties on a Sunday morning. DONE IT!! Holy &%**$ is the best &%**$!! It is quite a challenge, but it is SO worth it!! It is sometimes difficult as you often feel like you are forcing yourself on her? You approach her, you start undressing her, she says no, you laugh and keep going. . . I find that I am often with this perception. So we always dialogue afterwards when she tells me how good it was but that she feels guilty that she has fornicated before her god. But WHATEVER! I got mine and she got hers. If she wants to feel bad so be it!!

Comments for this post are closed