The demand for privacy markets in everything

This story is about Abramovich's private yacht:

Infrared lasers detect the electronic light sensors in nearby cameras, known as charge-coupled devices. When the system detects such a device, it fires a focused beam of light at the camera, disrupting its ability to record a digital image.

The beams can also be activated manually by security guards if they spot a photographer loitering.

The yacht also has a missile defense system.  For the pointer I thank Daniel Lippman.

Comments

It doesn't have an air search radar, deck gun, close-in weapon system or missile launch platform, so I'm not certain what kind of "missile defense system" it could have. Maybe they'll be fitted later, but I don't see where they would go.

Comments for this post are closed

'nearby cameras'... should actually say nearby *digital* cameras. I sense a niche use for old-school analog technology, here :-).

Comments for this post are closed

Since a CCD is a passive device, I don't see how they can be detected. Autofocus systems, yes - but not the CCD chips themselves, not if you're manually focusing.

Comments for this post are closed

Let's see. You can pick up an excellent used manual camera - no electronics - with telephoto - for a few hunded bucks...

Comments for this post are closed

Maybe the systems effectiveness against paparazzi is due to a perceived notion that it does work. Just hype.

How far can it work against? What about a good telephoto lens that might work from a mile away?

Of course, I wonder how all these excellent photos of the yacht (just google it) were taken, in spite of the anti-paparazzi system?

Comments for this post are closed

Remember the economists who said after the fall of the Soviet Union:

Never mind that state property auctions may not be perfect, or even if there is corruption, what matters is that the property, if it is in private hands, will be operated more efficiently than it is now, and over time, everything will work out because the market always work, no matter how the initial hand is dealt.

Well, does it? Has it?

Why did it fail in the Soviet Union and succeed in other Eastern Block countries? Or, is it still evolving?

Comments for this post are closed

Abramovich's debit card is good to get such a wonderful yatch but not for Chelsea to win the UEFA Champions League. Go Barça.

Hear, hear!

Comments for this post are closed

Vehical Driver, It seemed to me that the point of the post was that there was this oligarch who captured all this money and built himself a big boat. It was the post's point. Sounds like its OK with you and Abramovich. Just saying that those who said the initial hand would devolve into efficient, comepetitive enterprises (without state payoffs and bribes) may have time to wait.

Comments for this post are closed

I have seen laser-based systems that will highlight lurking snipers, so this isn't too far-fetched. "IR laser" is not very descriptive: too far into the IR and (1) it won't pass through the lens to detect the CCD (which actually requires two passes through the lens), and (2) it won't disrupt the CCD because it is beyond its response region. But maybe the detection and disruption lasers are separate? However, most modern cameras have CMOS detectors, not CCDs, so this thing is obsolete before it gets out the door. Or the reporter is confused. Or it's nonsense. And easily defeated (as pointed out above) with film or a narrow band rejection filter (or an IR cut filter if it really is an IR laser).

Ken, you can get a new digital back for your old Hasselblad (and maybe those others). $14,000.

Comments for this post are closed

@Bill

You assume that a) hands were indeed private and b) there is relatively free market.

You might want to find out how Abramovich came to power.

Comments for this post are closed

Right, because the USSR was a socialist utopia of equality and happiness.

And the instant it broke up, it was instantaneously a free market that transferred the state assets to a handful of oligarchs.

The State had nothing to do with the distribution of assets.

Comments for this post are closed

I've never heard a progressive complain about this:

http://movies.yahoo.com/feature/movie-talk-rent-johnny-depps-personal-pirate-themed-ship.html

I guess because Johnny Depp makes an honest living providing a product of real social value.

Comments for this post are closed

As an aside, a system like this is described in Spider Robinson's near-future light SF book _The Free Lunch_.

Comments for this post are closed

Selling off stuff wasn't the biggest problem (it was one of smaller ones though). The fact that rule of law differs for certain government officials (their relatives and friends as well) is. You can have any kind of auctions as much as you please, but what's the difference if in the end property rights depend on lack of interest from those in power?

Comments for this post are closed

The anti-camera device probably looks for reflections from the glass (IIRC this is the same as the anti-sniper systems), but returns fire with an IR laser to saturate the photosensor rather than with .50 BMG.

Comments for this post are closed

It was the post's point like its with you 。

Comments for this post are closed

I don't see where they would go,Let's keep it that way.

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed