Good sentences about inflation

As free goods become increasingly plentiful throughout the economy, and people learn to recycle, swap and exchange goods without monetary transaction, it becomes very difficult to engineer an inflation problem.

That is from Izabella Kaminska.  Most of the post is about the gold market.

Comments

A good sentence, but I think that "cheap goods" are much more important in this sense than "free goods". Craigslist, eBay, and e-commerce in general have greatly increased the ease and quantity of recycles, swaps, and exchanges. The monetary transactions involved are considerably less than they would have been two decades ago, thus helping to keep inflation in check.

Comments for this post are closed

| "As free goods become increasingly plentiful throughout the economy, and people learn to recycle, swap and exchange goods without monetary transaction, it becomes very difficult to engineer an inflation problem." |

-

Nonsense.

'Scarcity' is the first law of basic economics -- free goods do not & can not plentifully increase throughout an economy.

Barter exchange to avoid monetary transactions & inflation is a small-scale, last-resort economic tool... that can not possibly support a modern large-scale economy.

Engineering inflation is extremely easy if you are Ben Bernake... or run a national central-bank.
{U.S. general inflation now running at 8.4% annualized rate, according to just-released Labor Dept report -- Thanks Ben!}

U.S. general inflation now running at 8.4% annualized rate, according to just-released Labor Dept report

Can you reference that please?

Comments for this post are closed

Look its a flying pig!!! Nice cherry pick. Calculated Risk has the numbers from the Cleveland Fed. All rates are about 2.5% except for the one including fuel which was the 8.5% due to the 180% uptick in fuel prices.

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

Echo griggs: Nonsense!

Comments for this post are closed

Vibrant markets in used goods is an indication of low income. All we need is some inflation so that everyone would have more money.

Or better mechanisms for matching used goods sellers and buyers. I get most books on my Kindle, but a few books which I needed but didn't have a Kindle edition I got used and in good condition from Amazon. "Good" condition means only light wear and tear, with no markings or rips, which suits my purposes just fine. I also sold a couple of books on Amazon in what was a very efficient process.

In other words, you are assuming an increase in used goods is due to an income effect. However, the increase can also be due to a substitution effect. As it becomes cheaper to buy used goods, we will buy more used goods even if our income is constant.

Comments for this post are closed

Or higher quality of goods, leading to extended useful lifetimes.

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

Well, the sentence would be more accurate with a single 're-' added -

'and people relearn to recycle, swap and exchange goods without monetary transaction'

Since this has been pretty the much the case thoughout history and all societies.

Or why a true Green Party will always exist.

Where?

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

My impression is that stuff now is amazingly cheap. What kills you are the rents.

That was my thought. People can dodge on a lot of things, but it's hard to dodge on the rent.

Even rents can be mitigated through shared accommodations.

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

Rents are definitely higher.
Source: http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/housing/census/historic/grossrents.html

Why is that? Is this primarily regulatory? Where we don't let people live in housing that was as cheap as was built in the 1940's/50's? Is it population growth that is faster than new land becomes accessible? Other?

I suspect a large part is regulatory. Building codes are much more intensive and expensive than they were 30 years ago.

Supporting housing prices probably doesn't help.

I'd also guess that rent per person per square foot has increased much less than rent. People are buying more space and not having to live with their parents/grandparents/(now ex-)spouses.

Yep. As recently as the early 70s my dad's family was in a ~1000 sq ft house with a family of six. That would be literally undreamt of today. We are now three in a house of roughly that size and people talk about how small it is.

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

All the comments on rents are well taken. I particularly sympathize with Urso. However, when I first read the word "rents", I thought of political rents!

Actually I meant real estate, education/ credentials, insurance (particularly medical insurance), and taxes. Real estate is still a big part of it. Anything charge for basically just being around, because the organization is powerful enough to do it.

I thought you were saying something along these lines. Great comment.

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

Nah, used goods have supply and demand curves just like new goods, and shifting the demand curve outward increases their price just like new goods.

Comments for this post are closed

Gold is not going to be considered a commodity for much longer.

Comments for this post are closed

Hi,

My name is Neil Shaffer; I’m the affiliate manager at Binaryoffers.com,
The biggest affiliate network for Binary Options and Forex.

I’d like to invite you to join us and enjoy the many advantages we give our affiliates

- We pay the highest commissions in the industry.

- We provide real time live reporting and accurate tracking system used by companies like Zynga and Sears.

- A dedicated affiliate manager that will work for you 24/7.

- And most importantly – GET PAID ON TIME, EVERY TIME !!!

I am available to you via email or Skype (aff.binaryoffers) for your convenience.

Thank you in advance for your response.

Best regards,
Neil

Comments for this post are closed

I think that the Idea of moving from a society and economy that is driven by the “mighty dollar”, to a barter system economy would be fascinating. It would be very interesting to observe how people decided to react in everyday transactions such as buying milk or a tank of gasoline. It could become difficult to operate in our everyday lives because there would be no measurement to determine how much of one item was equal to that of another. I think that people would eventually become adjusted and establish an unwritten understanding of the value of items that would help people decide just how many chickens would equal one cow, or how many cows would be equal to one truck. It would be interesting to see what items would rise to the top of the ladder in this new barter system. I believe that goods that satisfy needs such as food and water would become more valuable in this new economy because they are goods that are necessary for survival, and goods that satisfy wants could possibly loose some of their value due to the fact that they only satisfy wants and not needs. I also agree that in this new economy issues such as inflation would become a problem of the past. It would be difficult for inflation to exist because there would be no monetary transactions. This would allow for the value of goods to remain at a lower rate and could allow people to barter for more goods and services.

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed