It is one of the most visually spectacular movies I have seen.  The first half is a very good movie in its own right.  The second half is mostly narcissistic trash, only periodically compelling, in which Cruise also rewrites the story of his break-up with Nicole Kidman, in what seems to me an unseemly manner.

Most of all, it is a Straussian commentary on Scientology (and Kidman), you can start your research here.  I am stunned but not surprised that very few reviews have picked on this angle at all (so far it seems that none have and even Quora fell down on the job).  Without such knowledge, the movie makes no sense whatsoever.  With such knowledge, the movie is entirely coherent but in some regards more objectionable.

There are also some nice references to other Cruise movies, such as Top Gun and Eyes Wide Shut, not to mention some of the non-Cruise classics of science fiction cinema, including Star Wars and 2001 and Solaris.

I am very glad I saw this movie, but your mileage may vary.  The Wikipedia entry is here.


"Most of all, it is a Straussian commentary"

A non-falsifiable statement if ever there was one.

Read the Xenu story synopsis along side the Oblivion synopsis. They're surprisingly close. Falsifiability is the test which demarcates scientific claims, not film criticism.

Furthermore the Nicole Kidman stand-in has an Australian accent and is named "Victoria," a region associated with Kidman (though she was born in Hawaii). The other parallels between Kidman and the first female lead are quite clear but would involve spoilers.

This is a very interesting analysis, but the parallels between the Victoria character and Kidman don't hold up

The "Victoria" character has lovely British accent - not remotely Australian.
Nicole Kidman was born in Hawaii and grew up in Sydney NSW. She did study and work in Melbourne Victoria.
Australia has 6 states. Victoria is the second most populous and the centre of the television and movie industry.
You'll have a hard time finding an australian actor that isn't "associated with the state of Victoria".

Shaka, when the walls fell.

I appreciate the reference to one of the great episodes of that show, although not sure I understand it in context.

How can someone be stunned but not surprised


It's the feeling you get when punched in the nuts after you saw it coming.

We have our winner.

"There are also some nice references to other Cruise movies, such as Top Gun and Eyes Wide Shut, not to mention some of the non-Cruise classics of science fiction cinema, including Star Wars and 2001 and Solaris."

Also the scene where Cruise returns to the Tet reminded me a whole bunch of the scene in Independence Day where Will Smith sneaks into the mothership.

The overwhelmingly clear movie/TV reference that I haven't seen mentioned much is The Jetsons. The entire production design of Cruise's home above the clouds is right out of Hanna Barbera.

Slate's reviewer caught the tie-in to scientology:


Interesting. Appreciate the Strauss in this context.

I was just musing about the totalitarian tactics of Scientology earlier this week. It's hard for me to avoid the almost surreal shimmer of Tom Cruise in light of his association with the Scientology "techne".

Don't appreciate it too much. Cowen describes every movie as Straussian, from Star Wars to The Devil Wears Prada.

There are plenty of non-Straussian movies, most of them in fact, but they don't need me to review them!

I would hesitate to reach any of the conclusions that you have reached. Oblivion is based on a comic written by the director. I don't know if the director is a scientologist and I don't know how it differs from the movie (which I found disappointing). It could be that Tom Cruise decided to join the project because it had similarities to the Xenu story or his relationship with Nicole Kidman, but that doesn't necessarily mean the story was written with that in mind.

The comic is unpublished though so it's impossible to verify whether the storyline is independent.

So what about someone taking an elementary schooler?

Does anyone else find it hard to believe that Tyler has time to sit down and watch a 2 hour tom cruise movie?

Can someone spell out for me the Scientology connection in this movie? I agree with Tyler than the first half was beautiful and the second half bad. The second half was extremely predictable, at least if know your science fiction. Could there appear to be a Scientology connection simply because the movie recycles shopworn sf themes? The Kidman thing seems a bit far fetched, too.

I'm shocked by this review. The Kidman angle is interesting, but I thought the movie itself just stole elements from three or four other sci fi movies. The actions scenes were straight lifted from Star War and the finally from Independence day. Even the sound effects from the drones were from Star Wars Tie Fighters. When they shot the first drone that followed them to the hideout I half expect a Wookie to jump up yelling and the background to switch to Hoth. Morgan Freeman's character is just Morpheus from the Matrix. I knew what the twist would be before Cruise's opening monologue finished.

Are you stunned but not surprised?

I enjoyed it for what it was. I enjoyed it even more for the obvious and amusing Cruise ego stroking.

Not only is Cruise responsible for conquering the world, but he is also its savior. Not only does he get to die a hero's death to save the world, but he also gets to live to help repopulate it. Not only does he get with the beautiful redhead, but he also gets the sexy brunette. Cruise lives the dream of every adolescent male of having the world revolve around him.

Great comment! Also here's a related article to point out that Cruise is not the only one 'living the dream' on screen (and off): http://www.vulture.com/2013/04/leading-men-age-but-their-love-interests-dont.html I do enjoy the Straussian movie reviews (though they remind me of backmasking) and as of yet they have not diminished my enjoyment of the films.

No mentioning of Moon?

I would say that Moon was a much better constructed movie.

Dear Tyler:

I write a lot of conspiracy theory movie reviews, too, but they are more persuasive when you can document them with quotes or career connections. If your theory is on the money, additional supporting evidence is usually not hard to find.

For example, are any of the screenwriters on "Oblivion" Scientologists?

Also, movie releases generate a huge number of interviews, and moviemakers often either drop hints or flat out state what the underlying themes of the movie are. For example, Boer refugee auteur Neil Blomkamp repeatedly told interviewers that "District 9" was less an "apartheid allegory" (as everybody in America believed) than an allegory about illegal immigration from Zimbabwe and reflected his Malthusian worries about overpopulation:


Andrew O'Hehir of Slate is practically the only politically correct critic smart enough to notice that a lot of big name moviemakers are secret rightwingers.

I just found it incredibly derivative. All that was missing was the hammock cloning machine from The Simpsons.

Your review reminds me of another one of his movies, Vanilla Sky, which I had to get up and leave in the middle of. It made no sense and I was bored to tears.
Cruise ought to leave the deep stuff to directors like Ang Lee and focus on what he is good at: playing roles like Jerry McGuire!

So, I still can't tell if I should see the movie, or if a normal person should see the movie unless said normal person is pre-occupied with scientology, but only pre-occupied enough to learn about it through vague symbolism. I know that's not the point, but that's my observation.

Don't waste your money. Every twist was obvious right from the opening segment of the film. And it was boring, boring, boring.

I was fascinated by the movie's take on the current state of the war on terror. (Mankind is continuously attacked by drones and can only be saved by a suicide bombing.)


Thanks for sharing your thoughts on ดารางบอล.

Hey! I know this is kinda off topic however I'd figured I'd
ask. Would you be interested in exchanging links or
maybe guest writing a blog post or vice-versa? My blog addresses a lot of the same topics
as yours and I think we could greatly benefit from each other.

If you are interested feel free to send me an e-mail. I look
forward to hearing from you! Superb blog by
the way!

Therefore it is very important to know that there is a food of
the diet of the brain that is accessible to all. You could also boil cauliflower florets or broccoli and
dip them in salad dressing or salsa. Programs that
work on re-composition ideally have healthy weight loss and muscle increase occurring simultaneously.

All large purchases are always intimidating, especially if you are uninformed
about the industry. One of the scariest purchases is buying cars.
Many people fear they are getting ripped off and you surely don't want that. Avoid buying a lemon by looking through these great tips and tricks regarding car purchases.

Hi there, I spotted your website on http://marginalrevolution.
com/marginalrevolution/2013/04/oblivion.html while searching for a corresponding subject, your blog came up,
it seems interesting. I've saved it in my google bookmarks.

I was wondering if you ever thought of changing the page layout of
your blog? Its very well written; I love what youve got to say.
But maybe you could a little more in the way of content so people could
connect with it better. Youve got an awful lot of text for only having 1 or 2 pictures.

Maybe you could space it out better?

Thanks for the good writeup. It actually used to be
a entertainment account it. Glance complicated to
more added agreeable from you! However, how can we be in contact?

Comments for this post are closed