Amazon eBook questions that are rarely asked

Why are Amazon ebook reviews from US readers more important than reviews from international readers?

Have you noticed that reviews from Amazon.com are aggregated across all other international Amazon sites, but that the reverse is not true? If someone kindly posts a review of a book on Amazon.co.uk, it is stuck there, and not aggregated to Amazon.com. Why? Is a UK review less valuable than a US review? Are reviews from Canadians, Australians or India inferior to US reviews?

Source here, via Sofia Tania.

Comments

American company follows American centric laws when doing business - especially when places like the EU have extremely strict data privacy laws and different copyright frameworks. Which means that using American reviews internationally is not a problem, but to use reviews from a country like Austria just might result in all kinds of unanticipated work. As happened with Facebook -

'Facebook is poised for another legal battle over how it handles European users’ data, as the Austrian Supreme Court is set to decide whether more than 25,000 Facebook users can join together in a class action suit filed by Austrian privacy activist Max Schrems.

Mr. Schrems, a law student at the University of Vienna, originally filed the complaint against Facebook’s European headquarters in Ireland in July 2014, quickly gaining the support of tens of thousands of European users alarmed by how the social media site collects their data.

In July, a lower court in Austria threw the suit out, saying it had “no jurisdiction” over the claim, but Schrems appealed, with a Vienna appeals court saying that he could personally file a suit because he is covered by local consumer protection laws.

But he wants to expand beyond such a “model case” to examine whether Facebook’s practices in Europe violate local laws on data protection, which are often stricter than those in the US.

There are several concerns, including users’ inability to consent to how their data is used, the tracking of users on third-party websites and Facebook’s alleged participation in the US bulk surveillance program PRISM, which the company has long denied.' http://www.csmonitor.com/Technology/2015/1123/Facebook-poised-to-face-class-action-privacy-suit-in-Austria

Interesting, but how do you think this is relevant to the Amazon reviews?

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

A possible explanation: I would not be surprised if Americans trust other Americans' opinions, but mistrust the opinions of people from other countries ("it had all these 5-star reviews, but then I found out they were all, like, English people or something"). Since Amazon is selling itself as a place to find good reviews on products as well as selling the products themselves, it's brand would be hurt by including international reviews on the American site.

International reviews, in this view, are pooled because either the resistance isn't as strong, or because there are so many fewer reviewers in other countries that the brand hit from including them is smaller than the brand hit from having too few reviews.

Of course, it could just be path dependence and lazy coders.

>"I would not be surprised if Americans trust other Americans’ opinions, but mistrust the opinions of people from other countries"

That's not bigoted at all. You sound like a very enlightened person.

well he's only making a comment on other people's preferences, so yeah he doesn't sound bigoted at all.

Comments for this post are closed

The Other Jim,

Bollywood films are extremely popular in India. Personally, I don't enjoy them at all. Would opening up my movie review list to millions of Indian reviewers improve the odds that I'll enjoy the sorts of movies that they recommend? Probably not.

Comments for this post are closed

So what you're saying is that I'm going out on a limb when I suggest that people prefer people to whom they have a connection to people with whom they do not? Or that being American is a thing that is Americans care about?

Comments for this post are closed

America is clearly the world's largest cultural exporter. Oliver's proposal about Americans' bias toward their own opinions (which may or may not be bigoted, but there is no reason to think that he is) is highly consistent with that.

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

I live and read in Argentina. I have posted several reviews in Amazon.com and they have been published. I do not think Americans mistrust the opinions of people from other countries.
Besides, if you are writing online, what is the advantage of posting your review in Amazon.com.uk instead of Amazon.com?

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

Amazon Project Manager: We just launched our UK site, but the books don't have many reviews yet. The pages look very empty.

Amazon Dev: Hmm, well, there lots of reviews on the US site. Want me to just grab the reviews from there?

Amazon Project Manager: Sure, sounds good. On to the next problem.

5 years later: Random rant about how Amazon values US reviewers more than other countries.

Yeah, I would bet that this is a matter of convenience and not something that has a lot of thought put behind it.

Do you truly think anything about Amazon doesn't have a lot of thought behind it?

yes?

Comments for this post are closed

Whatever happened to lists? Why did they take my lists?!

(Listmania lists, not wish lists)

Comments for this post are closed

Oh wait, I figured it out: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goodreads

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

In if there has been thought behind it, that thought is likely to be "The system work, don't **ck with it ".

Comments for this post are closed

Indeed, in my experience after having worked at Amazon for a few years, not everything Amazon does is part of a deliberate plan. The software is a bit messy and chaotic, and when something sorta almost works, sometimes it is just left alone because there are more important things to do.

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

That is most probable.

Comments for this post are closed

Yes this is it. I am in the tech industry and this is how things happen.

Comments for this post are closed

Another tech industry professional who sees this as the obvious and most likely explanation.

Comments for this post are closed

This is exactly how it happened.

Also, people forget, Amazon used to be just books, then products, then e-books.

So a system set up for books is country specific due to publishing.

Product sales make it even more so, as VAT and other regulations come along.

Finally you add ebooks, but this system is already set up and running like this.

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

I thought this was just American exceptionalism.

Comments for this post are closed

MARKET SIZE !

Comments for this post are closed

To be blunt, on cultural matters Americans' opinions count a lot more than non-Americans. Pretend you were in charge of marketing an expensive new movie franchise, ultimately wanting it to become a part of the cultural fabric like Harry Potter or the Avengers. Honestly, how would you weight the value of awareness among different parts of the world? Ball park, converting a single American is worth two Anglosphere denizens, four continentals, and ten Asians. That simply represents the usual direction that global culture flows in.

Among people living outside the US, the anxiety of being non-American is palpable. To a different degree depending on country, but its there nearly everywhere. I'd imagine its very similar to living in the first century Mediterranean outside Roman Italy.

No particular opinion on the first half of your comment, but having lived in Australia, the UK, Hong Kong, Switzerland, France, and the Netherlands I'm yet to note any anxiety- palpable or otherwise- over not being American.
(Notable exception being CS students everywhere, most of whom are counting down the days before they can move to Silicon Valley)

Having lived in Europe and not having my status tied to faux-cosmopolitanism I have to say this comment is 100 percent the opposite of truth. Europeans are obsessed with American culture. The screeching about American "racism" and "war-mongering" grows louder the greater the obsession. France isn't obsessed with America in the same way that the chubby freshman girl isn't obsessed with the starting QB in her class. The only check on obsession is the realization that they are out of their league.

I agree there is a lot of tedious, ill thought out anti-americanism in the world. And that this is some sort of inferiority complex, where in this case "inferiory" means "smaller".

Still I don't get the impression that anyone wants to be American, or that many people want to be anything other than what they already are.

Comments for this post are closed

Living for several years in the Netherlands now, I have to say that my experience is between those of Sam and Theo. The Dutch love American popular culture, technologies, cultural symbols (cowboys and freedom and hamburgers etc), academic output, language, etc. There is some anxiety about the disappearance of Dutch culture. But the Dutch make little pretense to be a world power, culturally or otherwise. I don't think that I have met a single Dutchie who actually wants to move to America.

Comments for this post are closed

I bet the Europeans you met while living there didn't like you very much.

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

"Among people living outside the US, the anxiety of being non-American is palpable"

No, thanks.

You're an example. PA already checked in, where's Thiago?

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

I now have a new game to play; ask my non-American colleagues about their anxieties of being non-American. Much laughter typically ensues, though there is also an expression of gratitude that we don't have American police, primary education, or opiate overconsumption.

(I'm American but have lived abroad for the past nine years. I miss the cheap petrol, and many lovely people, but not the vacuous and unjustified cultural chauvinism.)

If your colleagues never think or talk about America (or only rarely) I believe you. But a malevolent obsession is still an obsession.

Comments for this post are closed

gratitude that we don’t have American police

And their experience with 'American police' is precisely what? Would they prefer Perugia's Keystone Kops?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Meredith_Kercher

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

The anxiety is about gradually becoming more American.

Comments for this post are closed

Well, in per capita terms I would think that UK, Australia and Canada have similar per capita levels of cultural influence compared to the US, maybe greater. UK has more very influential pop music artists: Iron Maiden, Judas Priest, Black Sabbath, Motorhead, Led Zeppelin, Deep Purple, Beatles, Rolling Stones, Venon, David Bowie, Pink Floyd among others, in per capita terms, UK has bigger international cultural influence than the US, in terms of music, even in absolute terms. Australia has AC/DC, Canada has Rush. Overall, in per capita terms other English speaking countries appear to be in equal footing in terms of cultural influence.

Its also true that the average Anglophone person has bigger international cultural influence than people from continental Europe and people from Asia. Japanese people only influence Japanese people and western otakus (example, X-Japan, perhaps Japan's most influential rock band doesn't have a remotely comparable international influence compared to Led Zeppelin or The Beatles). Although, it's also true that China's population is about equal to the population of Europe + North America + South America, so maybe individual Chinese artists might influence other Chinese to a greater number han Led Zeppelin influenced westerners.

You might have an argument with the UK in the case of books and music. But not for movies and TV, perhaps because the accent is more noticeable. The assertion that Canada and Australia have the same per capita levels of cultural influence is laughable. I probably follow popular culture as much as the average American yet I cannot name a single Australian or genuinely Canadian movie.

Crocodile Dundee, Breaker Morant, The Road Warrior, Etcetera were not small movies.

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

Per capita, Iceland is the most culturally influential country in the world, but that doesn't mean everyone loves Icelandic culture. Per capita measurements don't matter at the global scale. The US is clearly the most culturally influential country in the world, which is probably a lot to do with it's size. If Europe were a country, then it would be in the running. That doesn't mean everyone wants to be American, though, which is just a silly statement. It just means that people in other countries are much more aware of America and its cultural products than Americans are aware of those from other countries.

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

The English-language Amazon Japan book reviews suck. They are all from the same guy.

Comments for this post are closed

Just a quick check using one of the most quoted books.....Capital in the 21st century. 205 reviews in amazon.co.uk and 1644 reviews in amazon.com

The most "helpful" review in the UK is By A. D. Thibeault on 26 Mar. 2014 while is the US is by Aguadito on April 24, 2014

Did Amazon made an upgrade since Oct. 9 2015 when the rant was written? Or.....is the rant justified?

Also made a quick check in .de, .es, .mx, .jp and the first reviews seem to be different for Piketty's book. What's going on here?

Reviews may be shared from America to other countries, but votes as to whether a given review is helpful could be country-specific.

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

Anecdotal guess: American reviews are likely to be more positive. Thus, American reviews raise average ratings in Europe, but European reviews would lower average ratings in the US. Amazon wants reviews to be high.

Not sure about any of it, but that's my guess.

Comments for this post are closed

Could non-American insecurities get any more pathetic?

"My Amazon reviews insufficiently highly-regarded -- it must be because I'm not American!"

Really? Has it gotten this bad?

Even funnier is the comments pouring into an American site like MR angry at the suggestion that non-Americans are obsessed with Americans. To quote a non-American they doth protest too much.

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

I'm still trying to find out why you can buy a hundred Kindle books about Wittgenstein but only a couple by him. Or why so few Criterion films are available as Amazon videos.

Comments for this post are closed

This isn't entirely accurate. Amazon.com reviews on Amazon.co.uk are clearly segregated from the 'main' reviews, and are basically listed as supplementary information. So, if the thing has a UK review, you're going to see that first. Only if there's no UK reviews at all will you see the US review.

On Amazon.com, no segregation exists. All reviews are shown, it's just that they're mostly - but not exclusively - from people in the US. Also included are reviews from international customers where the selection of available books on Amazon.com is better/cheaper than the selection in their home region. As a UK customer I've bought books from Amazon.com before, and could write reviews there if I chose. So, Amazon.com probably features reviews from non-Americans that aren't clearly segregated from the rest of the American-authored reviews, whereas in the UK almost all reviews are from people in the UK and the American reviews are clearly labeled. I don't find this such a problem, though the asymmetry is odd.

I think this is a general pattern, that while many large tech companies will have country-specific sites for reasonably large Asian and European countries, they generally have the .com as the catch-all for Americans (who don't seem to care) and whoever else doesn't get their own country-specific site (who don't have a choice).

Comments for this post are closed

1. I've lived in Japan for 25 years and I've never heard of a group named X-Japan. That's how famous they are in Japan. I know Kyu Sakamoto, Bump of Chicken, Shonen Knife, and Pink Lady however.

2. Wittgenstein's books are now in public domain, are they not, and are available online in pdf, am I wrong? The demand is probably not overwhelming (every university library will have them). Perhaps the reason is simply that publishers have few incentive to publish them. Incentives, like Black Lives, Matter!

The translations aren't.

Comments for this post are closed

What about Melt Banana? I just assume they're like The Beatles of Japan.

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed

UK book market is distinct. Many books are published there with different titles, dates and prices. So it might be harder to aggragate.

Also, Amazon will not even offer me an amazon.com book from its uk site. Even when context proves ths might generate a sale.....

Comments for this post are closed

I really love reading E-Books; it is something we should all be interested in. I am a Forex trader, so I love reading E-Books about these, but of course, I don’t like to pay too much. I get free guides from my broker OctaFX, as they are number one broker in the world and always provide ideal facilities for new comers to feed on and that’s exactly what I do with them and it has helped me become really good trader.

Comments for this post are closed

Comments for this post are closed