Why talent sorting in Germany is flawed
I won’t double indent, but this is all from Simon Grimm:
-
German academia doesn’t have world-class universities and is self-avowedly egalitarian.
-
Without a clear top university, many talented students instead enter highly competitive medical schools to prove their ability.
-
But, as argued here, medical school is a bad default choice for these students if you care about accelerated scientific, material, and moral progress. This is for four reasons:
-
Entering many different universities instead of one top college, talented students do not generate and thus do not profit from local agglomeration effects.
-
Medical students aren’t allowed the intellectual flexibility to explore ideas and projects independently.
-
Medical school takes six years, offering no intermediate degree. This locks in students’ choice of study, even if they change their minds.
-
Lastly, practicing medicine offers small impact at the margin (i.e., talented medical students can’t add much to an already highly advanced medical system).
-
-
Instead, talented individuals could study subjects and enter jobs that allow them to do much more good.
-
Changing this status quo is difficult, as i) strong competition between universities is probably disliked by university administrations and ii) reforming existing universities is famously hard through entrenched bureaucratic decision-making and ensuing vetocracy. Thus, change might only be possible through affluent outsiders who launch a new, better university.